Trains.com

Amtrak to get $2 Billion a year in Congressional Transportation Bill

1807 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Amtrak to get $2 Billion a year in Congressional Transportation Bill
Posted by CMStPnP on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 5:06 PM

It might be whittled down some since it has not been voted on yet nor has it passed the Senate but so far proposed for Amtrak is $10 Billion over 5 years.......

http://news.yahoo.com/congress-reaches-deal-5-transportation-bill-185455214--politics.html

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 5:39 PM

Let's hope so.  Write your congressman and senators.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 9:28 PM

It sounds positive.  Nevertheless there is a hooker.

" It also authorizes $10 billion over five years for Amtrak, $12 billion for mass transit and $1 billion for vehicle safety programs. However, that money is subject to annual spending decisions by Congress rather than being paid for from the federal Highway Trust Fund."  

This means that Amtrak will still have to fight Congress for the full amount every budget year.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Matthews NC
  • 363 posts
Posted by matthewsaggie on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 9:32 PM

error deleted post.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Friday, December 4, 2015 9:47 AM

OK bill is approved by a wide bi-partisan margin and is on the Presidents Desk.

Votes were:

359 to 65 in the House

83 to 16 in the Senate

Amtrak and Mass Transit verbage for funding amounts still in place.

 

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Friday, December 4, 2015 5:17 PM

Uh, oh. Wednesday's Wall Street Journal says the bill would budget separately for the NEC, allowing NEC "profits" to be used for capital needs on that line. The rest of the network, "which the railroad says loses money," would hang separately.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, December 4, 2015 7:01 PM
  • Member since
    February 2013
  • 5 posts
Posted by ColdRainAndSnow on Saturday, December 5, 2015 9:31 PM

Folks --  These are just Authorizations and mean very little. The rubber meets the road when it's actually time for Appropriations, when the actual money is allocated. And given the obtuse Majority running our Congress right now, you can bet on your child's life that the Amtrak Authorization will be FAR, FAR below the $2M/year mark. 

But the Majority has been breaking their arms patting themselves on the back about this bill all week regardless. Yay? Hardly...

 

  • Member since
    February 2013
  • 5 posts
Posted by ColdRainAndSnow on Monday, December 7, 2015 10:47 AM
Meant to say the Amtrak APPROPRIATION will not be $2M/year regardless of what the bill authorizes.
  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Monday, December 7, 2015 8:24 PM

ColdRainAndSnow
Meant to say the Amtrak APPROPRIATION will not be $2M/year regardless of what the bill authorizes.
 

I guess $2M/year is far below the $2B/year that was authorized

  • Member since
    February 2013
  • 5 posts
Posted by ColdRainAndSnow on Monday, December 7, 2015 8:45 PM

Yep, meant Billions and botched it all around...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy