Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Actually Long Distance Trains should be the Focus
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>Whether one believes that the long distance trains, or Amtrak for that matter, are in the national interest or are a waste of money, the long distance trains, as well as Amtrak, probably will be with us for a long time. </p> <p>In FY10 Amtrak's comprehensive losses averaged $15.50 per federal income tax payer - a person who filed a federal income tax return and paid some federal income tax. The losses on the long distance trains were $7.64 per taxpayer. This analysis assumes that all federal revenues are derived from income taxes, which of course is not correct. </p> <p>Advocates for special interests - those of us who love trains are special interests - figured out a long time ago that the way to raid the federal treasury is to take just a little from everyone. Thus, although Amtrak loses more than a billion dollars per year, for the typical American median family income taxpayer, whose average federal income tax bill in 2010 was $4,828, the Amtrak subsidies don't even register on their tax radar scope.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy