Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
California HSR, why was it approved?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="MidlandMike"]</p> <p> <blockquote> <div>Remembering the Minneapolis bridge disaster, I can agree they need to spend more on highways.</div> </blockquote> </p> <p>I can't argue that the CA HSR is beyond becoming a financial black hole, but the legislature probably concluded that continuing on the old path, or doing nothing, was an even greater risk. <div style="clear:both;"></div> [/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The minneapolis bridge collaspe had nothing to do with a need to spend more on roads and bridges. But it was dishonestly exploited for that charge by the people who cannot stop spending public money. The bridge collapsed due to a design error, which had nothing to do with maintaining the bridge. </span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The California legislature (like all legislatures) is wired to spend money.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That is how they empower themselves and the institution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The belief that they can solve every problem by spending money courses through their veins.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Naturally, they will defend their spending by saying that doing nothing is not a good option.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But they exaggerate by suggesting that anybody is advocating they do nothing.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">However, the solution to the problem is indeed doing less.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That is exactly what will avert the problem of a spending meltdown.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But the California legislature is not wired for that solution, so their rail project will go forward and will speak for itself in either confirming or refuting my prediction of becoming an economic black hole.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I would say that it might be a large enough project to become the first example of the economic black hole.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy