Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Russian High Speed Rail Pay Off
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language: EN;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">“According to Vedomosti, Mr. Yakunin disregarded capital costs in his calculations - the preparation of the infrastructure, the construction of depots, and even the purchasing of the trains themselves.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language: EN;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">“As a matter of fact, the total spending on acquisition, technical preparations, railway repairs and construction of depots made up 45.22 billion rubles. Three pairs of Moscow-St. Petersburg trains return the monthly profit of not more than 231 million rubles. Therefore, the project of high-speed trains in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Russia</st1:place></st1:country-region> is not going to pay back during the upcoming 16 years.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language: EN;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The aforementioned statements are confusing. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If the first statement is accurate, the trains are not profitable. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>They may generate an operating profit, but the calculation ignores the capital costs, which is not acceptable accounting. Profitability requires the inclusion of all costs. Excluding the capital costs would produce an adverse opinion from the auditors and financial analysts.</span></span></span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language: EN;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">If the second statement is accurate, it appears to ignore the financial costs associated with the technical preparations, railway repairs and construction of depots, or at least the financial information is not provided. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Depending on the terms of the financing, i.e. interest rates, terms, investment banking fees, etc., the long term cost of the project could be double the stated cost.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>For example, the backers of the California High Speed Rail Project estimate the project will cost between $40 and $45 billion.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>However, when the financial costs are factored into the cost structure, the cost of the project is likely to be in the neighborhood of $73.2 billion to $82.3 billion. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Based on the projected ridership and revenues, the project will never pay for itself or be profitable. </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy