Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
A Contrarian View of High Speed Rail
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P mce_keep="true">[quote user="henry6"] <P>You're right, Sam. If you don't like what a magazine or newspaper stands for, or a TV netwrok, station, or show, stands for, don't buy, don't look. But also don't complain. That is who they are and you know that going into it. (And I mean this in a generic, general way, not a personal way.)</P> <P>[/quote]</P> <P>I did not mean to imply that I did not like what I read in Trains, and it was not intended as a complaint. As I stated, I buy approximately four issues of Trains a year because they contain more than one article that I want to read. I also have downloaded many of the past articles that Trains has made available on-line.</P> <P>My point was that Trains, like most special interest publications, may not be the most objective source for an assessment of the value of passenger trains. The same applies to all sorts of special interest group publications, i.e. gun magazines are not likely to promote laws to curb gun ownership; fitness magazines are not like to urge people to become couch potatoes, etc. </P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy