Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
"Don't worry about Sam.  Sam thinks that any mass transit system that doesn't make a profit is a waste of money and should be shut down or have the fares raised substantially so that the public does not have to contribute.  While I disagree, it's not really a complaint.  A great many people feel that way about a great many programs." Actually, Sam believes that intercity passenger rail should cover it variable or operating costs.  I also believe that it should contribute something to the fix or capital costs, i.e. the NEC.  I have never harbored delusions that passenger rail could make a profit. Local transit is a utility.  I have never suggested that it make a profit.  I have, however, suggested that those who support it be aware of the costs, inasmuch as the money comes largely from people who don't use it.    Those who ignore the costs associated with their pet projects, i.e. intercity passenger rail, either don't know how to read a financial statement or don't care to.  They are perfectly happy to have money taken out of other people's pockets to support their interests.  Also, because they don't pay attention to the finances, they oftentimes push for their transport solution, e.g. light rail, whilst frequently overlooking more cost effect technologies, e.g. rapid bus technology. To imply that the Piedmont is well patronized and is the justification for adding another train between Raleigh and Charlotte is not supported by the ridership data.  Neither is the claim that 10 passengers on the train that hit the truck in question is unusual.  If the average load factor is 43 per cent, there are probably many days when the train carries fewer passengers than could be accommodated on a bus.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag