Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
US High Speed Rail
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P mce_keep="true">[quote user="Phoebe Vet"] <P><FONT color=#660033>How many tanks and Bradley's can you transport from the midwest to the coast on a cargo plane?</FONT></P> <P><FONT color=#660033>You can move 100 of them on one train.</FONT></P> <P><FONT color=#660033>If FEMA kept their supplies, mobile emergency rooms, and mobile command posts in standard size containers, 200 of them could be rapidly deployed by rail on ONE train. If Amtrak had more equipment, evacuations could be made much faster.</FONT></P> <P>[/quote]</P><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman">No country has the air and sea lift capability to mount an invasion of the American heartland. If war comes, at least in the near future, it will be in the form of a missile attack. It probably will be a terrorist attack, or it will be a massive come as you are attack launched by a large adversary or coalition of adversaries. Railroads would play no role in such an attack, other than to be partially destroyed.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman">In a conflict similar to the ones that the <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region> has fought over the past few decades, far from its borders, the ability to move heavy equipment to seaports by rail has been helpful. But passenger trains played little if any role in getting the troops to their continental departure points. In fact, most of them flew to the jumping off point. <o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman">The argument that the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region> needs to maintain a national passenger rail network for military purposes is not sound. Amongst other things the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region> cannot afford it.<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT> <P style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman">If decades in the future a country or group of countries had the capability to launch a massive sea and land assault against the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region>, they would presumably only do so if they have sea and air superiority. One of their first targets, as was the case in Operation Sea Lord, would be to knock out the railroads and roadways as soon as possible. The trains, as the Germans learned during WW II, would be irrelevant. </FONT></FONT></P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy