Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Another Argument for Amtrak
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="CSSHEGEWISCH"] <p>Essential Air Service Operations sounds analogous to Designated Operators for railroads. The imminent collapse of Big Sky Airlines sounds similar to what happened to the original Braniff, Midway Airlines and a host of other operators: rapid expansion which was not supported by passenger counts on those routes, which then brought down the entire operation.</p><p>I would hardly consider this situation as an argument for Amtrak.</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>In this instance it has nothing to do with deregulation or over-expansion of the airline industry. </p><p>Big Sky Airlines was contracted by the government to provide regularly scheduled air service to more out of the way towns and cities with airports. If this is removed, then the alternative transportation choice would be with Amtrak in those cities that are currently served by the system. Those cities not served by Amtrak would then either have to rely on bus service if they have it, or by private vehicle.</p><p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy