Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Hypothetical Scenario: Where should the high-speed rail go?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="Gavriel609"] <p>We all know that Japan and Europe are beating us in practically everything except for diabetes/obesity, carbon emissions and failing students, but something I personally cannot stand is that they're beating us in high-speed rails. </p><p>[/quote]</p><p>I'm not sure where you derived this POV that Japan and Europe are "beating" us, but evidently that POV doesn't include such minute things as average income, tax rates, unemployment rates,.....aka quality of life issues. The only thing Europe is beating us in is the encroachment of socialism/junk science into our private lives.</p><p>That being said......</p><p>[quote] </p><p>So, suppose the following:</p><p>Someone has offered to lend our country $20 billion to build a high-speed railway. Something that all of you may notice is that this money is only going to heavily support one rail line. </p><p>[/quote]</p><p>Well, at least it's not taxpayer money. I assume this is a speculative for profit venture, and not just a quirky example of philanthropy?</p><p>[quote] </p><p>Here are the options:</p><p>A. Make the Adrionack line (New York City - Montreal) high-speed</p><p>B. Make the Empire State/Maple Leaf (New York - Buffalo - Toronto) high-speed</p><p>C. Build a high-speed line for California (San Diego - L.A. - Sacramento/San Francisco), noting that luckly, the Govenator has already approved of this plan</p><p>D. Build a high-speed line for the Texas Triangle (Houston - Austin - San Antonio - Dallas)</p><p>E. Build a high-speed line for Florida (Tampa - Miami - Orlando)</p><p>F. Make the Cascades line (Eugene - Portland - Seattle + Vancouver, BC) high-speed</p><p>G. Follow CSX's plan to make Washington D.C. - Miami "the corridor of the future"</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>None of the above, for this reason: If you want to build a prototype for-profit HSR, the first thing to look for is a corridor with the least amount of potential competition. In my view that means no parallel Interstate Highways (never underestimate how the lack of an interstate highway can make travelers consider other options). Secondly, choose a corridor that has some freight potential, aka potential UPS or FedEx contracts to help underwrite the project.</p><p>That being said, I would opt for the following:</p><p>Phoenix-Las Vegas-Reno-Eugene</p><p>LA-Reno-Boise-Spokane</p><p>Salt Lake-Albuquerque-Lubbock-San Antonio</p><p>Kansas City-Little Rock-New Orleans</p><p>St Louis-Little Rock-Shrevepot-Houston</p><p>[quote]</p><p>H. Build awesome locomotives to gain our dignity and set a new speed record</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>Perhaps a rendition of the Coors Light Silver Bullet Express based on the Pennsy T1 concept?!</p><p>[quote] </p><p>J. Remain Americans, and do nothing </p><p>[/quote]</p><p>You mean remain smart and practical?</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy