Trains.com

Floating Railroad Bridge

4014 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Floating Railroad Bridge
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 8:52 PM

Watching this now on Impossible Engineering. It will use overhead power.

https://www.metro-magazine.com/10007312/seattles-floating-bridge-is-high-tech-light-rail-link

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 11:05 PM

Always a delight to see good engineers thinking.  I've been a fan of floating bridges since coming across the Hood Canal floating draw in those Time-Life books...

Here's some catnip for y'all:

https://www.autodesk.com/autodesk-university/class/Make-It-Move-Animation-and-Rigging-3ds-Max-Engineers-and-Architects-2018#video

3D dynamics of CeSuRa in action ... and how it was developed.  Note the other accessible resources...

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • 1,675 posts
Posted by Erik_Mag on Thursday, July 23, 2020 10:22 PM

Overmod

I've been a fan of floating bridges since coming across the Hood Canal floating draw in those Time-Life books...

IIRC, the title for that particular book was "Wheels". My dad had bought the whole collection of the Science and Nature Library books, remember having a good time reading them when they came in. The books were nicely done, edited by people who knew the subject. Sure wish there was an updated version of the series.

A floating RR bridge conjures up a vision of car floats lined end to end - which would make for a unique ride... Sure was some fancy engineering is smoothing things out.

Which reminds me, the book "The Beauty of Railroad Bridges" mentioned that suspension bridges were rarely used for carrying RR tracks, as frieght trains need a very rigid bridge structure. A floating bridge would be even worse.

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,269 posts
Posted by SD70Dude on Friday, July 24, 2020 12:18 AM

There are some similar 'floating bridges' on CN's former Algoma Central line in northern Ontario, where it crosses some very deep muskeg swamp's.

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, July 24, 2020 10:02 AM

SD70Dude

There are some similar 'floating bridges' on CN's former Algoma Central line in northern Ontario, where it crosses some very deep muskeg swamp's.

 
I believe that Monon's Cedar Lake bypass was built to get around a similar situation in northwest Indiana.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Toronto, Canada
  • 2,560 posts
Posted by 54light15 on Friday, July 24, 2020 11:42 AM

How does a floating bridge deal with marine traffic? 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, July 24, 2020 7:01 PM

54light15
How does a floating bridge deal with marine traffic? 

Originally, in about the simplest manner possible.  If a bridge floats, why not a drawspan?  

The nifty thing about the Hood span 'as described' was that the facing ends of the openable span were made as pockets (imagine large floating tuning forks) and the opening part was retracted into the stabilized pocket.

Apparently the necessary do-si-doing of traffic was no more optimal than you'd expect, and the arrangement was replaced by a straight-through one where part of the roadway is lifted and the movable span is pulled under it.  The 'pocketed' span can be kept closed if the size of ship and escort permits; this reduces the 'cycle time' for the operation.  Here's a video of part of the operation when both spans are moved:

From a page describing bridge operations:

The drawspan must be opened during heavy winds to relieve pressure on the bridge. This bridge isn’t like the floating bridges in Seattle, as those cross a lake, and aren’t subject to tidal forces. The Hood Canal Bridge endures the daily stress of tidal swings, and when fierce winds hit during bad weather, it intensifies the force that’s being exerted on the bridge, with pressure strong enough that it could damage important components. The wind storm “season” is from October through March, and while it’s impossible to predict how often one will hit during this period, it’s rare to experience them more than once or twice a season, meaning during those five months, it’s likely to be open for travel 99% of the time.

There are articles on these bridges (and Washington's somewhat Dupont-wreck-like inability to keep some of them afloat) if you look.  Note the function of the hinged 'approach span' trusses, which accommodate the vertical tidal action much as some ferry bridges do.  It would be more difficult to provide the necessary 'hinging' transition for light rail than for road, probably involving a speed restriction far short of 55mph; note that the original bridge does not 'see' major tidal excursions and hence engineering difficulties are not as severe.

Incidentally there are also 'floating bridge' designs that are completely submerged.  These are far less susceptible to storm action but have much the same rather obvious problems as, say, the original Britannia tubular bridge.  In a sense the PRR North River tunnels are like this, as they flexibly rise and fall with tidal action; some of the transbay BART tunnel construction was intended to be separate from embedment to prevent catastrophic seismic shearing of the tremied concrete 'tubes' ...  one of my favorite science-fiction alternate histories, by Harry Harrison about 'A Trnsatlantic Tunnel, Hurrah!' had one of these as a key plot device. 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, July 24, 2020 7:14 PM

Question from when first in Seattle 40 years ago.  Why floating and not fixed pylon ?  a matter of cost or lake bed problems ?  Depth about 250 ft at most.

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,445 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, July 24, 2020 9:48 PM

The Milwaukee Road had a pontoon bridge across the Mississippi at Praire du Chien until 1961:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pile%E2%80%93Pontoon_Railroad_Bridge

  • Member since
    July 2020
  • 54 posts
Posted by highball6868 on Wednesday, July 29, 2020 12:40 PM

A floating railroad bridge was used on Rutland Railroad to cross Lake Champlain with much success-

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, July 30, 2020 3:42 PM

There were two floating spans on what became the Rutland.  One crossed Lake Champlain between Alburg Vermont (no "h" until after WWI) and Rouses Point New York on the Ogdensburg and Lake Champlain section of the Portland and Ogdensburg.  It was replaced with a "draw" (swing) span due largely to its habit of dumping stuff into the lake, especially in winter.  The other was between Leicester VT and Ticonderoga NY.  Its utility dropped quite a bit after the Rutland built its line up through the Champlain Islands to the former O&LC floating bridge site, and it was summarily shut down by the USRA in 1918 after yet another train entered the water.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy