Cleveland DC and Baltimore have to shut down there metros for weeks when they need a major repair but NYC can replace tracks while the system is moving. DC needs to contract with NYC for repairs. DC has grown post metro from 600,000 people in 1970 to a Metropoliton Area of 5 Million in 2010.
I don't know how it's done elsewhere, but the Chicago Transit Authority has found that a total shutdown often allows a total rebuild to be done in appreciably less time than depending on off-peak only shutdowns. Prime example is the rebuilding of the Dan Ryan line a few years ago. The rebuilding of the Green Line (Lake-Cottage Grove/Englewood) took longer because major structural rebuilding was required.
Well, what can we say? Along with their cops and firefighters, New York's got the best transit people in the world.
Mind you, I mean no insult to any of the others by that statement.
Many lines on the NY subway have the advantage of having a set of local and express tracks, so if one set of tracks needs work, the other can be used during maintenance. For most other cities, they only have a two-track mainline running throughout their system, so service cannot be re-routed during maintenance.
NYC Subway does shut down when extensive repairs are needed. Because of the size of the subway system, a segment of a line is usually shutdown, rather than the entire line. Recent shutdowns have generally been for repair work for damages caused by Superstorm Sandy, e.g. the R between Manhatten and Brooklyn, shutdown for 14 months in 2013-14.
Recently, MTA announced the upcoming shutdown of the L line between Manhattan and Brooklyn to repair the Canarsie tunnels for possibly three years, and the shutdown of the M line in Queens for several months to repair elevated structures.
The MTA also has a program called FastTracks, where a segment of a line is shut down overnight for repairs. This has been ongoing for several years. The NYC Subway system operates 24/7, so these shutdowns do cause riders some inconvenience.
Seems the newer systems have a lot to learn from the NYC subway and the EL
On my last trip to Road America in 2013, the CTA line that runs between the lanes of I-94 on the Southside of Chicago was shut down for major maintenance. I believe it was shut down for several months.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Connecting the complex of lines around DeKalb Avenue (three lines to Coney Island and one to Fort Hamilton) with Manhattan, one can use the north side of the Manhattan Bridge, the south side, or the Montague Street Tunnel. During bridge repairs, one pair of transit tracks on the bridge was shut down, then the other side, and after Sandy, the tunnel. These were all about half-year closings. There is enough reduncancy in the NY system so that what would be a massive shut-down in another city, requiring bus shuttles, can be handled keeping rail connections in New Yorik. There are other examples.
The "L" line shutdown may require some shuttle busses however.
With the exception of the North Shore Skokie line when it parreled the Red Line in the north there is not a a express track. However this does not prevent single bi directional tracking
Apoologies for not being more specific. By "L" line, I was not referring to the CTA, but New York's old No. 16 14th Street Canarsie line. which is two tracks all the way, and where Sandy damage still requires repair in its tunnel under the East River. Passengers from Myrtle Avneue station and east to Canarsie will probably all still be handled by all-railrouting to Manhattan, via the existing J, Z, and M lines. And there may be 14th Street shuttle run only in Manhattan. But that still leaves a few stations without rail sevice that may need bus connections to existing services.
Regarding the CTA, portions of the route shared by Howard Street north-south and Evanston Express, and for a part, Ravenswood, do have four tracks and some major repair and maintenance is possible without complete shutdown. Part of the southern portion of Lake-Engnlewood/Jackson Park has three tracks. The other redundancy is N - S either via the Loop or via the State St. subway. But that is all.
CandOforprogress2 With the exception of the North Shore Skokie line when it parreled the Red Line in the north there is not a a express track. However this does not prevent single bi directional tracking
Firelock76 Well, what can we say? Along with their cops and firefighters, New York's got the best transit people in the world. Mind you, I mean no insult to any of the others by that statement.
CandOforprogress2 Firelock76 Well, what can we say? Along with their cops and firefighters, New York's got the best transit people in the world. Mind you, I mean no insult to any of the others by that statement. That is New York Vaules
That is New York Vaules
YUP... NYCT has four track trunks in Manhattan, and even so it is also very fleixble, If something is closed, things can be re routed one line via another route.
Besides, the last time I looked, the also had LIONS in their subways.
ROAR
The Route of the Broadway Lion The Largest Subway Layout in North Dakota.
Here there be cats. LIONS with CAMERAS
When I used to visit New York City in the 1990s, the entire express section of the Flushing Queens Boulevard Line was shut down for rebuilding for almost a decade. The E train was reintroduced as an express.
One of the lines over the Manhattan Bridge was shutdown for over a decade, too.
So, yes, NYC does shut down entire lines, though the Queens Boulevard Line was a four-track line with only two tracks out of service, the local is extremely slow, almost as slow as single-tracking on the Washington Metro.
The Manhattan Bridge rebuild project shut down and rerouted about a half dozen lines.
Well, part of it is that the NYC Subway has actually kept up with maintenence the last 20 years, unlike METRO...
A friend of mine from high school who wound up working in DC back in the 70's told me the REAL reason they built the Metro was to get the crime off the streets and put it underground.
No, he didn't like DC, AT ALL.
Me, I've always liked Washington, a great walking city with lots to see and do, but then, I don't live there.
CandOforprogress2 Cleveland DC and Baltimore have to shut down there metros for weeks when they need a major repair but NYC can replace tracks while the system is moving. DC needs to contract with NYC for repairs. DC has grown post metro from 600,000 people in 1970 to a Metropoliton Area of 5 Million in 2010.
This all depends on WHAT work needs to be done. Working on power feeders or sighanls could very well shut the whole thing down. Tracks can be worked on in between trains, and if a rail is out it will tale less than a half an hour to fix it. Trains can be routed via diferent lines. If an 8th Avenue local track is out, trains can run express or they can run via 6th Avenue. (F) trains have been known to run via the (GG) line if something is amiss on 6th Avenue.
The Sandy Tunnels are a case apart, If you have to do that much work, you do have to close the tunnel and just do the work, maybe 18 month or more.
They did this with the Montague Tunnel, but only the (R) train was really affected by that, at night it could run over the bridge, in the day time, it could short turn at Whatehall in Manhattan, and southbound at come conveinent station in Brooklyn.
Throguh riders would likely switch to the IRT for stops in lower manhattan, passengers for Midtown would have already switched to one of the Bridge lines at DeKalb or at Atlantic.
Systems without geographic redundancy are freash out of luck.
The NYCTA has released a very informative video about the repairs needed on the L Train Canarsie Tunnels and the service options.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gt_JloKcE7s
I am routing the following suggested plan through a friend in the NYC area who has done consulting for the TA on several projects and supervised construction on several. I hope he likes my plan and forwards it with whatever changes he thinks desirable. Meqnwhile, all of you you can comment on what you think.
Guess Metro North has some repairs to make.....
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fire-halts-train-yorks-grand-central-terminal-001131622--nfl.html?ref=gs
NorthWest Well, part of it is that the NYC Subway has actually kept up with maintenence the last 20 years, unlike METRO...
That's not really true in the broader perspective. Sure, you can say New York's MTA has kept up in only the last 20 years, but the reality is that the New York City Subway was falling apart for decades due to deferred maintenance and other problems decades before the City took it over. Hardly anything was rehabilitated since the IND system was developed.
In the 1970s the system was in a crisis. It was literally falling apart and catching fire all day every day. It was orders of magnitude worse than the DC Metro. After the NYC financial crisis was mostly resolved the MTA started on a rebuilding program that is still going on today, over 45 years later.
After the 1980s (except for Sandy, which wasn't their fault), the NYC Subway has been steadily improving and returning to a state of good repair. Metro has done the opposite.
Riding the subway every day during the 1970's, I can assure you the crises was not that bad. Fortunaely, the system had been bujilt to such high standards that even deferred maintenance did not stop the trainis from running. And before the city took the IRT and BMT systems over, maintenance on the BMT was as high a standard as one could wish, but the IRT was in bankrupcy and did just what was needed to keep things running. The service was generally reliable. Today, in Jerusalem, I could use that reliability for our bus system. Not entirely the bus system's fault, traffic problems, incidents, etc. The light rail runs more reliably, but it also has had outages or partial outages. In the 1970's, Metro North and its predessor operation under Conrail, had problems more often than the subway system, stemming from the PC days. A number of times, say about four during the entire decade. returning from my office near the White Plains North Statiop, we unloaded at Wakefield, and walked over to the Gund HIll Road Station to catch the 2 or 5 sbuway train to comploete oiur journey to Manhattan. And one morning one of my two partners picked me up at the 241wst Street White Plains Rd. (Av.) tp drove tje wokl. In the 80's and up to the time I left in 1996, Metro North, as well as the subway, got lots and lots better.
Hard copy sent regular airmail yesterday:
דוד לויד בן יעקב יהודה קלפר, ישיבת בית אורות, שמואל בן עדיה 1, הר הזיתים, ירושלים 97400
Wait a week or two, then send a letter to the Times, Post, and Newsday that describes the idea. Stress in the letter the importance of giving as many people as possible the idea of the changes, in the same spirit as the pamphlets or handouts you propose.
I received form a reply from NYCTA already. I honestly expect a positive reply, and would not contact the newspapers. Indeed, my second mailing would be to Mayor de Blaso, and the Borough Presidents of Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens, ---- if necessary. Newspapers would be the last resort.
Should explain, the letter was also e-mailed via the comment section of the NYCTA website's Canarsie Line Tunnel recfonstruction page.
REceived formletter email reply:
Recently you requested personal assistance from our on-line support center. Below is a summary of your request and our response.
You know, I think the wrong person's running the subway.
Don't be surprised if you get a job offer David!
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.