Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="VOLKER LANDWEHR"]The question is is it possible to achive this kind of pattern between a light-rail system and NCRR.[/quote] If this possible RME is right the light rail transit systems doesn't have to follow FRA crashworthiness rules. I jumped to conclusions in my first post. To get back to BLE and NCRR there was an analysis called "Analysis of the Use of the NCRR Corridor for Light Rail Transit". <a href="http://www.ourtransitfuture.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/2.11a-01036-REV-Analysis-Use-NCRR-Corr-LRT-22Nov13.pdf">http://www.ourtransitfuture.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/2.11a-01036-REV-Analysis-Use-NCRR-Corr-LRT-22Nov13.pdf</a> On page 33 the BLE using the NCRR row is discussed: Quote: "There are currently two freight tracks in the 200' right-of-way. Future plans negotiated by all parties call for a total of 3 to 4 freight tracks, 2 high-speed rail tracks, and two light-rail tracks." End of quote. Perhaps these future extensions made shared-track with the NCRR tracks unfeasible. Regards, Volker
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag