Trains.com

36" Dynamic Brake fans on SD38

3719 views
41 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,318 posts
Posted by Backshop on Thursday, September 7, 2023 4:12 PM

I wonder if it could have something to do with the later units having shorter radiator grilles.  They got rid of the middle partition and shortened it. That would allow room for the bigger fans.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,238 posts
Posted by timz on Thursday, September 7, 2023 6:21 PM

Far as we can see, the two grid fans on B&LE 865 are the same diameter. But they're clearly smaller than the 48-inch? radiator fans.

Was there room for two 48-inch grid fans between the two engine exhausts of an SD38?.

  • Member since
    November 2021
  • 181 posts
Posted by JayBee on Thursday, September 7, 2023 7:57 PM

Here is a link to a photo of B&LE 862, an early SD38 that predated the air filter box and never received one. It is also taken from a high enough elevation that you can clearly see that it has one older style fan and one newer style fan. Using 48" fans would bring the fan shroud 6" closer to the exhaust stacks.

B&LE 862

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,605 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, September 7, 2023 8:57 PM

The Victorian Railways purchased 24 locomotives that were basically SD38s.

The first four units were built with 16-567E engines, 645E engines fitted with 567 power assemblies and the next two were built with 16-567C engines recovered from wrecked cab units. These were model G16C. The next eighteen units were model G26C with 16-645E engines. All of these had SD38 radiators with two 48" cooling fans.

However, they all had export type dynamic brakes mounted forward of the engine, with a single 48" fan. These had shorter but deeper grids behind a basically square ventilation grille. I understand for radiator fans, two 36" fans are equivalent to a single 48" fan.

So these must have had similar limits on dynamic braking to an SD38 with two 36 DB fans.

Several of these locomotives were rebuilt with 16-645E3 engines and larger radiators, but retained the single 48" dynamic brake fan. Strangely, a number of new locomotives were built to this design with the 16-645E3 engine.

So clearly, even an SD40 could operate with the smaller dynamic brake capability.

Peter

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,238 posts
Posted by timz on Friday, September 8, 2023 10:56 AM

Looking at the drawing on the last page of the link below, I wonder if two 48-inch fans would fit between the SD38 exhausts

EMD Locomotive Specification Book SD38-SPEC8058-01JUN65.pdf (wildapricot.org)

If anyone has an SD38 service manual, it likely will show whether it can absorb 3800 horsepower in dynamic, like the SD40.

 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Bridgman, MI
  • 263 posts
Posted by bogie_engineer on Friday, September 8, 2023 1:51 PM

timz

Looking at the drawing on the last page of the link below, I wonder if two 48-inch fans would fit between the SD38 exhausts

I can confirm that two 48" fans will fit between the exhaust stacks on a 16-645E engine. In the 1970's, I had design responsibility for roots blown engine exhaust manifolds and designed the spark arrester-silencer exhaust manifolds that were required on locos built starting 1-1-1980 to meet EPA noise regs. Those manifolds had 10" round exhaust stacks rather than the oval stacks on prior manifolds and were designed to fit between two 48" fans on the SD38-2, even though no SD38-2's were built after 1979.

Dave

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,807 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Saturday, September 9, 2023 10:38 AM

The drawing clearly shows 36" fans.

And yeah, the SD38-2s had 48" fans so unless the 38-2 has a physically longer car body, it makes sense they would fit. 

 

I know the dash-2 was longer, but I don't personally know if the carbody is longer or if it was just the porches 

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,318 posts
Posted by Backshop on Saturday, September 9, 2023 12:36 PM

Whatever the size of their dynamic brake fans, the SD38-series have always been my favorite diesels.

  • Member since
    September 2023
  • 1 posts
Posted by GWRR on Friday, September 15, 2023 9:29 AM

Dave, 

Can you send me a PM at Nicholas.longshore@gwrr.com

Nick

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Canada
  • 1,801 posts
Posted by cv_acr on Monday, September 18, 2023 2:02 PM

YoHo1975
The question I had was why they would build it this way. When the SD39, SD40, SD38-2, SD39-2 all have 2x48" As noted the smaller fans absolutely does change the capacity of the dynamics. 

You'll also note that the GP38, GP40, etc. all have 1x48" fans. Almost like it has more to do with the number of axles or something........

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,437 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, September 19, 2023 2:37 PM

Since nothing definitive has turned up, it could be there really isn't an answer - at least not an answer beyond "because an EMD engineer in the 1970s did some calculations and determined that was the size it needed to work properly".

Stix
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,807 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Friday, September 22, 2023 3:30 PM

Well and given that our Resident former EMD engineer has not found any info on the subject. I'm content to leave it as unknown.

 

I didn't even know they were smaller until someone corrected me on it. I always find the engineering knowledge interesting.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy