Trains.com

CSX hates SD70ACe's

46750 views
66 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, February 3, 2017 3:40 PM

BaltACD
GenSet - the most detested, poorest excuse for a locomotive that has yet to be devised - hated by crews forced to use them.

Had some of them years ago on a remote job.  When they were running, they weren't completely terrible (still better than being stuck with a -9), but that was the thing.  When they were running. 

A couple times I went to try and start it, and all I could get out of it was the little RJCorman train dancing across the info display screen in the cab.  Luckily we didn't buy too many of them, and I think all of them are now semi-retired / confined to shop duty.  I did enjoy having what sounded like a tractor pulling the train, though.  Ones I had featured some Deutz engines (some of which ran once in a while), I believe.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • 149 posts
Posted by Entropy on Friday, February 3, 2017 10:31 PM

zugmann

 

 
ATSFGuy

Is an SD70M better than an SD70ACe?

 

 

 

Yes.

 

Any explanation?

  • Member since
    October 2016
  • 185 posts
Posted by Saturnalia on Saturday, February 4, 2017 12:53 PM

NorthWest

 

 
Saturnalia
4. The SD60Is are also rumored to be on the chopping block because they've got old electonic tech which is no longer supported, and conversion isn't considered a cost-fesible option.

 

I wonder if this is actually the isolated cab... did they really have greatly different equipment from the CR SD60Ms from about the same time? EMD isolated cabs from that era haven't aged particularly well when it comes to the rubber bushings that hold the cab to the frame.

What is the status of the retired unit? I think there are still the ex-BHP SD70ACes of similar vintage still at Muncie.

What I've heard is that the computer interface is different and there may be some different controls in the electrical cabinet which are no longer supported. It makes them full re-wire candidates, which is something more akin to Altoona than to Huntington these days. 

The retired SD70ACe is still on property last we heard. It was removed from the roster for a grounded alternator, the same malady as several of the other SD70ACe currently in storage. 

For railroads, which keep track of performance metrics, the SD70ACes on CSX are below 50% availability...akin to absolute garbage. 

n012944

 

 
Saturnalia

 keep in mind, every 4-axle unit on CSX is an EMD now!

 

Almost, but not quite.

D'oh! Of course I knew that. There are 26 Gensets technically on the CSX roster. You could also argue for or against the Road Slugs. I guess you *could* consider them EMDs because of the frame. In any case, the way my spreadsheet is kept, they're tallied by builder or rebuilder, so the Slugs aren't EMDs, either. 

Glad you caught me as I spun myself in a grandiouse comment! 

 

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Saturday, February 4, 2017 3:06 PM

Saturnalia
What I've heard is that the computer interface is different and there may be some different controls in the electrical cabinet which are no longer supported. It makes them full re-wire candidates, which is something more akin to Altoona than to Huntington these days.

Interesting. Their small class size works against them as well.

Saturnalia
For railroads, which keep track of performance metrics, the SD70ACes on CSX are below 50% availability...akin to absolute garbage.

Wow. A lot of steam did better than that!

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, February 4, 2017 3:24 PM

"Wow, a lot of steam did better than that!"

Hmmm, now what's that tell you?  Time to turn the clock back?

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • 149 posts
Posted by Entropy on Saturday, February 4, 2017 7:44 PM

NorthWest

Wow. A lot of steam did better than that! 

If you take UP for example you will see availability 96% GE and EMD. Both come within a percetage of each other, neither stands out. 

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • 149 posts
Posted by Entropy on Saturday, February 4, 2017 8:02 PM

NorthWest

What is the status of the retired unit? I think there are still the ex-BHP SD70ACes of similar vintage still at Muncie.

One thing you need to understand, the BHP units are equipped differently from anything used on a North American Class 1 railroad. This makes using them in NA a hard fit for most, or alot of rework. 

For example they have 220VAC 50hz outlets, dual air conditioners, no heaters, drains arn't heated, no awnings. The list goes on. 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Sunday, February 5, 2017 11:17 PM

Entropy

 

 
zugmann

 

 
ATSFGuy

Is an SD70M better than an SD70ACe?

 

 

 

Yes.

 

 

 

Any explanation?

 

 

Not much of one.  I just like running them better.  Many have analog gauges (none of that computer screen crap), older style air brake set-up, seem to respond quicker to throttle inputs, and the GM models just have better fit and finish than the post-GM.  Fewer rattles, better materials, etc.  I can't speak to the mechanics of them, just that they are more of an old-school locomotive. Last of their breed. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    October 2016
  • 185 posts
Posted by Saturnalia on Monday, February 6, 2017 7:06 AM

Entropy

 

 
NorthWest

What is the status of the retired unit? I think there are still the ex-BHP SD70ACes of similar vintage still at Muncie.

 

 

One thing you need to understand, the BHP units are equipped differently from anything used on a North American Class 1 railroad. This makes using them in NA a hard fit for most, or alot of rework. 

For example they have 220VAC 50hz outlets, dual air conditioners, no heaters, drains arn't heated, no awnings. The list goes on. 

 

Interesting notes, to which I'll add that even some units equipped for North American service aren't the best suited to it. CN has found their SD70M-2s to not be well suited to the harsh winter conditions of western Canada, they just can't keep them from freezing up like an ice cube. So, they attempt to keep them in the US during the winter. 

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Friday, February 10, 2017 5:05 PM

Hey, remember on January 16th I said railfans have to get trackside, because you never know what you might see?

Me neither, but anyway I was taking lunch today at one of my favorite spots on the periphery of the local Amtrak station, and there, parked and idling, was an NS Dash-8.  What was it doing at an Amtrak station in CSX territory?  Who knows, but it sure was an interesting find.

Got to get out there, especially if you live near a busy line.  You might see anything!

  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 711 posts
Posted by SD70M-2Dude on Saturday, February 11, 2017 7:39 PM

Saturnalia

CN has found their SD70M-2s to not be well suited to the harsh winter conditions of western Canada, they just can't keep them from freezing up like an ice cube. So, they attempt to keep them in the US during the winter. 

Really?  We get them out west all the time.  The whispercab-equipped units are considered the best DC units we have by us crews, in part due to their reliability. 

What is the reason for the cold-related problems?

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 1,345 posts
Posted by ATSFGuy on Sunday, February 12, 2017 11:28 PM

 If SD70Aces are disliked by crew members, what locomotives should the railroad use to pull freight? I know the first SD70ACE's made around 2004-2008 are terrible, but the second batch from 2012 onwards were better.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3 posts
Posted by Crocker Junction on Tuesday, December 18, 2018 4:41 PM
 
NSrailfan8114

They  Should buy EMDs

 

 

 

Other than for foamer variety, why?  As Northwest pointed out the thundercabs are junk, and at only 19 units, a small subfleet.  CSX seems to be OK with a majority GE fleet, so why are you so against it?

 

[/quote]

n012944

 

 
NSrailfan8114

They  Should buy EMDs

 

 

 

Other than for foamer variety, why?  As Northwest pointed out the thundercabs are junk, and at only 19 units, a small subfleet.  CSX seems to be OK with a majority GE fleet, so why are you so against it?

 

EMD has produced many outstanding units, in years past.  The SD70 and I believe the SD70Ace were developed by the Canadian owned EMD a few years back.  With the relatively new Electromotive Diesel acquisition by Progress Rail, and backed by parent Caterpillar, the EMD marque will have solid guidance and the mechanical and electronics maladies will be corrected.  The Railroad industry should do everything they can to help keep America’s two Class One locomotive builders alive, if not healthy.  Competition assures a dependable and competitively priced product.  I hope both manufacturers survive and flourish.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, December 18, 2018 5:03 PM

Crocker Junction

EMD has produced many outstanding units, in years past.  The SD70 and I believe the SD70Ace were developed by the Canadian owned EMD a few years back.  With the relatively new Electromotive Diesel acquisition by Progress Rail, and backed by parent Caterpillar, the EMD marque will have solid guidance and the mechanical and electronics maladies will be corrected.  The Railroad industry should do everything they can to help keep America’s two Class One locomotive builders alive, if not healthy.  Competition assures a dependable and competitively priced product.  I hope both manufacturers survive and flourish.

Purchase statistics indicate that the EMD/Progress Rail/ Caterpillar products are not operationally stepping up to the plate.  While the rail industry does need two or more manufacturers to keep price and performance under control - both need to have products that are near each other from a performance and reliability standpoint.  We are in the era of PSR - PSR requires reliable, economical motivepower.

EMD of the past is not the EMD of today.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:03 AM

EMD was rarely the innovator and went more for dependability in its designs.  Note that turbochargers weren't a factory application on 567 engines until Union Pacific forced their hand.  GE was first with a pressurized carbody, Alco had the first AC/DC drive (the C630), etc.

New locomotive sales are in the doldrums right now (rebuilds are bigger business) and it will be interesting to see what happens when sales of new motive power pick up.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:46 AM

It will be interesting to see how PSR plays out related to locomotives.

CN did not buy very many new for quite some time, and then when they first started buying additional units they went with used GE C40-8 units from various roads before buying new GEs in modest amounts.

CP has not bought any new units for quite some time other than the GP20C-ECO “rebuilds” to replace yard and local power. They have rebuilt numerous units such as SD60s and AC4400s. Now as traffic increases they are reactivating their long-stored SD9043MACs and rebuilding them to SD70ACUs to increase their active fleet size.

One would think that as CSX, NS and UP implement PSR, they will have a significant number of stored units and will be able to go to those first if they are successful at increasing traffic in the long run. As one potential example, UP on its own could go the SD70ACU route for their approximately 200 units of SD9043MACs if traffic bumps up, not to mention the legions of AC4400CWs and  SD70S they also own that could get the AC4400CWM or SD70ACC treatment.

So one might expect that new Tier 4 unit sales in North America for both GE and Cat/Progress/EMD will be in the smaller range for a number of years as PSR roads increase capacity from stored units first.

  • Member since
    February 2016
  • From: Texas
  • 1,552 posts
Posted by PJS1 on Thursday, December 20, 2018 1:13 PM

kgbw49
....not to mention the legions of AC4400CWs and  SD70S they also own that could get the AC4400CWM or SD70ACC treatment. 

Does UP own the locomotives or does it lease them?  

Rio Grande Valley, CFI,CFII

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,879 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:34 PM

BaltACD

 

 
Crocker Junction

EMD has produced many outstanding units, in years past.  The SD70 and I believe the SD70Ace were developed by the Canadian owned EMD a few years back.  With the relatively new Electromotive Diesel acquisition by Progress Rail, and backed by parent Caterpillar, the EMD marque will have solid guidance and the mechanical and electronics maladies will be corrected.  The Railroad industry should do everything they can to help keep America’s two Class One locomotive builders alive, if not healthy.  Competition assures a dependable and competitively priced product.  I hope both manufacturers survive and flourish.

 

Purchase statistics indicate that the EMD/Progress Rail/ Caterpillar products are not operationally stepping up to the plate.  While the rail industry does need two or more manufacturers to keep price and performance under control - both need to have products that are near each other from a performance and reliability standpoint.  We are in the era of PSR - PSR requires reliable, economical motivepower.

EMD of the past is not the EMD of today.

 

 

How many SD70ACes would EMD have had to sell for them to have "operationally stepped up to the plate?" Their sales counts are dwarfed by GE, but they aren't tokenism. In fact they seem to reflect a rebound from the previous doldrums.

I don't think the success of the T4 variant can tell you ANYTHING of value. Locomotive purchases have been off for some time. GE just had a product out in time to pick up some sales that EMD couldn't. The Railroads are ALL turning to rebuild efforts and are curtailing T4 purchases. And EMD/Progress seems to be doing quite well in that market.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, December 20, 2018 3:32 PM

YoHo1975
How many SD70ACes would EMD have had to sell for them to have "operationally stepped up to the plate?" Their sales counts are dwarfed by GE, but they aren't tokenism. In fact they seem to reflect a rebound from the previous doldrums.

I don't think the success of the T4 variant can tell you ANYTHING of value. Locomotive purchases have been off for some time. GE just had a product out in time to pick up some sales that EMD couldn't. The Railroads are ALL turning to rebuild efforts and are curtailing T4 purchases. And EMD/Progress seems to be doing quite well in that market.

Having the right product for the market when the market is looking for it is what business is all about.  Snooze and you loose.

The railroads don't want GE as the only manufacturer, EMD has to up the performance of their product line to take back market share.  That is what competition is all about and the carriers do want competition among locomotive manufacturers.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,879 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Sunday, December 23, 2018 1:19 PM
But nobody is buying new locomotives now. Not in quantity.
  • Member since
    April 2018
  • From: Northern NY (Think Upstate but even more)
  • 1,306 posts
Posted by Harrison on Sunday, December 23, 2018 7:34 PM

When I went railfanning in Utica, NY, I only saw one EMD- and that was a GP38-2.

img_9171

Harrison

Homeschooler living In upstate NY a.k.a Northern NY.

Modeling the D&H in 1978.

Route of the famous "Montreal Limited"

My YouTube

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Winnipeg, Mb
  • 628 posts
Posted by traisessive1 on Tuesday, December 25, 2018 1:13 PM

CN is in the middle of taking possession of a 260 unit order from GE. They hav ordered both T3 and T4 units. As of right now, CN is not rebuilding any of their fleet. 

10000 feet and no dynamics? Today is going to be a good day ... 

  • Member since
    December 2016
  • 34 posts
Posted by graflexlover1958 on Wednesday, December 26, 2018 9:08 AM

[quote user="DOUG KNAPP"]

SD60 M & SD60I are wonderful locomotives and CSX still uses both.  They are receiving PTC and have cab signal.  The SD70MAC is not too bad in both generations but the SD70ACe is a bad experience to operate and maintain.  They were designed by Rube Goldberg and slapped together by the Three Stooges.  20 units was 20 too many.  I know CSX is testing Cat's tier 4 ACe and I hope the results are better.  EMD locos have always been more durable and longer lasting than GEs but the first ACe units were a far cry from the quality of the SD40-2 units of which there are still many on the CSX roster.

Now that you mention it, Doug, I cannot seem to remember ever hearing Conrail engine crews complaining at all about their SD60I's and M's.   

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2016
  • 34 posts
Posted by graflexlover1958 on Wednesday, December 26, 2018 9:12 AM

Same here on the RF&P Subdivision of CSX's Baltimore Divison.  GE's predominate on most of the road trains now, with an ocasional visit by an SD40-2/-3.  Local power is still pretty much the very reliable GP38-2's and GP40-2's, though.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Winnipeg, Mb
  • 628 posts
Posted by traisessive1 on Friday, December 28, 2018 11:23 AM

The M-2 units are just fine in the winter. 

The SD70i and SD75i are trash in the winter. Their main reservoirs drop at the hint of cold temperatures. I don't know why they're the best liked. They're great on dry rail in warm termperatures but add in winter temperatures and/or wet rail and they're trash. 

The C40-8 and SD60 units CN has are trash in the winter. The heat sucks and the cab is drafty. You're always bundled up just as if you are outside when it's cold. 

10000 feet and no dynamics? Today is going to be a good day ... 

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,269 posts
Posted by SD70Dude on Friday, December 28, 2018 5:10 PM

traisessive1

The M-2 units are just fine in the winter. 

The SD70i and SD75i are trash in the winter. Their main reservoirs drop at the hint of cold temperatures. I don't know why they're the best liked. They're great on dry rail in warm termperatures but add in winter temperatures and/or wet rail and they're trash. 

I like them because they are really quiet (except in DB) and have good cab heaters.  I've even seen a few that have had strip heaters and air conditioning added, along with the PTC equipment they all seem to be receiving.

The AC units and M-2's have excellent wheelslip control, but I would prefer a SD75 over any of the DC GE units for a leader on grades.  The Dash-8's and 9's are terrible for surging, slipping and dropping their load, and many of the ES44DC's do that too.  When at different times I worked on the Grande Cache Sub and Alberta Coal Branch I noticed that tonnage trains with EMD power would climb the ruling grades slightly faster than those with older GE's, and stall less frequently.

The SD70I's and SD75I's were a pain when one found its way onto a mine run, as they do not work in pacesetter with any other units.  

traisessive1

The C40-8 and SD60 units CN has are trash in the winter. The heat sucks and the cab is drafty. You're always bundled up just as if you are outside when it's cold. 

Is Symington still putting portable space heaters in those?

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Winnipeg, Mb
  • 628 posts
Posted by traisessive1 on Monday, December 31, 2018 5:40 PM

They likely are. 

A train the other day left Fort Frances with two UP units on the head end and two UP on the tail end. Both head end units somehow lost heat. Their answer ... portable heaters. But since UP has crap all in their cabs there were no outlets! Not sure how the rest of the day went on for the relief crew. 

10000 feet and no dynamics? Today is going to be a good day ... 

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,269 posts
Posted by SD70Dude on Tuesday, January 1, 2019 5:20 PM

Whatever happened, I'm glad I wasn't there to experience it.  Those leased ex-UP and CSX units are absolute junk.  I thought our 2100's and 5400's were bad, these leasers are worse!

The CREX units are awesome though.  CN should just buy them on the spot.

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 4 posts
Posted by VINCE SAUNDERS on Tuesday, January 1, 2019 10:58 PM

Gennesse and Wyoming have several that were on the Utah Railroad as coal haulers, just like home for the type. For UR they generally ran well although the crews hated the low profile cabs. And since they were all being used in Utah they had to have heaters installed on all the parts that could cold soak. East Central Utah winters can get a might cold, especially in the coal country surrounding Price.

 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,879 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Thursday, January 3, 2019 10:11 AM

Here are the current loco order numbers per Sean Graham-White per his post on Loconotes You will note that CN took delivery of a sizable ET44AC/ES44AC-T4C order and UP a Sizable SD70ACe-T4 order....and everyone else was small orders or rebuilds.

  • (30) CN ES44AC T4C 3806-3835
  • (38) CN ET44AC 3133-3170* -- the final road number for 2018 is not confirmed yet
  • (5) CP AC4400CWM 8140-8144
  • (65) CP AC4400CWM 8000-8064, 8200 (11) Metrolink F125 932-942* -- awaiting confirmation that all 11 were built in 2018
  • (15) NS SD70ACe T4C 1175-1189
  • (2) NS SD70ACC 1800-1801* -- build date shifted from 2017 to 2018
  • (??) NS SD70ACC 1802-1826* -- awaiting confirmation on the # completed
  • (100) NS AC44C6M 4075-4174
  • (2) NS SD33ECO 6219, 6220
  • (??) NS SD70ACU Various #s, quantity not confirmed yet
  • (37) UP SD70ACe-T4 3062-3099* -- awaiting confirmation that all 37 were built in 2018
  • (20) UP C44ACM -- awaiting confirmation on the # completed
  • (8) UP SD70ACe 9097-9104
  • (4) UPY EMD24B 1000-1003

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy