Trains.com

"Fluidized" Coal Bed in a Steam Boiler. Another term that engineers think the layman knows

3771 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,568 posts
"Fluidized" Coal Bed in a Steam Boiler. Another term that engineers think the layman knows
Posted by CandOforprogress2 on Monday, July 23, 2018 3:20 PM

I assume  that when the fire in a steam loco is fluidized  it is operating at a optmization that is idealSmile and everyone is in there happy place.

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, July 24, 2018 2:13 PM

"Fluidized Bed" refers to a specific design, here for coal combustion: the primary air is injected under pressure and volume that levitates the particles in a (usually somewhat thick) firebed and in doing so scrubs them for full-surface combustion.  Generally some of the 'clean coal' co-firing materials, dolomite being the one that springs to mind, are incorporated in the bed to implement desulfurization, ash-chemistry optimization, etc.

One of the 'canonical' references you should study if interested in this subject is the early-'80s Combustion Engineering design:

https://patents.google.com/patent/US4633818

This of course needed gimbals and some other multiplane shock mitigation to be actually useful in a railroad context ... but they were trying.

 

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,568 posts
Posted by CandOforprogress2 on Wednesday, July 25, 2018 12:50 PM

https://patents.google.com/patent/US4633818  will read this when I get some throne time in the bathroom on my new e-reader.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, July 25, 2018 7:09 PM

...speaking of fluid dynamics...

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,269 posts
Posted by SD70Dude on Wednesday, July 25, 2018 8:30 PM

selector

...speaking of fluid dynamics...

LaughLaughLaugh

Seriously Raymond, have you ever heard of the term "TMI" ?

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Wednesday, July 25, 2018 8:37 PM

In case he hasn't a clue Too Much Information.

No one needed to hear that.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, July 26, 2018 1:03 AM

If a poster is visibly disappointed when he gets the information he specifically asked for, is that an indication that he is a resident of caves in the Scandinavian mountains...? Maybe a Dovregubben?

Peter

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, July 26, 2018 8:08 AM

M636C
If a poster is visibly disappointed when he gets the information he specifically asked for ...

I don't think he was disappointed; it's going to take a while for him to read that 'patent language' and translate it into comprehensible equivalent, and extract the parts of the patent description that refer to his original question.  What better way to do that than in the bathroom?  (Speaking of TMI, there are many times I've found 'throne time' the best time to peruse serial patent references... ;-} )

Note that I provided the link without much subsequent comment precisely because individual forum readers are their own best judges about what constitutes MEGO material.  (And if I get started, there's likely to be tooooooooooooo much detail, but that's another story.)

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,568 posts
Posted by CandOforprogress2 on Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:36 AM

I am impresssed with leval of knowledge here and yes thank you. But its been a busy summer and the only refuge is the "Seat of Knowledge".  My freinds have whole offices in their throne rooms and even have teleconfernces in there.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Thursday, July 26, 2018 5:35 PM

Hey, I always bring something to read in the bathroom.  Otherwise it's wasted time, don't you think?

Besides, it's a wasted day if you don't learn something new, what's it matter where you learn it?

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Thursday, July 26, 2018 6:45 PM

M636C
If a poster is visibly disappointed when he gets the information he specifically asked for, is that an indication that he is a resident of caves in the Scandinavian mountains...? Maybe a Dovregubben?

Peter

He's an NSB 2-8-4?

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Thursday, July 26, 2018 7:00 PM

Good gawd...Overmod and Firelock!

WTE

Worst Thread Ever.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Thursday, July 26, 2018 7:44 PM

Miningman

Good gawd...Overmod and Firelock!

WTE

Worst Thread Ever.

 

Heat's getting to us here "south of the border."

I don't know where Overmods's at, but here in Ol' Virginny summers are an inferno!  Good thing the car knows the way home, some afternoons lately my brain's fried!

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,269 posts
Posted by SD70Dude on Thursday, July 26, 2018 7:54 PM

It's baking up here too, BC is burning again, just like last year.  And so is northern Ontario.

Fortunately nothing like Greece's current situation has happened yet.

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:20 PM

Not here!  It was hot in Saskatoon but only 13C (55F))as the high here and the nights were 10C (50F)or less. Today was first warmer day in a week up to 22C (71F). The furnace kicked on Sunday overnight. 

We get hotter days up into the high 80's but not many of those. August nights wil be real cool. Leaves start turning last week in August. 

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Cardiff, CA
  • 2,930 posts
Posted by erikem on Friday, July 27, 2018 10:07 AM

Overmod

(And if I get started, there's likely to be tooooooooooooo much detail, but that's another story.)

I'm curious as to what the CE crew were thinking on the power output of this beast. I remember another company (Rowan Co???) working on a small fluidized bed boiler in the early 80's, ISTR it was a bit bigger than the CE design.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 24 posts
Posted by Piper106a on Friday, July 27, 2018 7:43 PM

Overmod did good job of defining fluidized combustion in the first reply.

However as David P. Morgan explained 60 years ago, in many steam locomotives the draft through the grate when working hard was strong enough to keep a lot of the finer coal particles from ever falling down onto the grate, the coal burned in suspension.  You could think of that as a 'poor man's' fluidized bed combustion.   

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Sunday, July 29, 2018 6:44 PM

NorthWest
 
M636C
If a poster is visibly disappointed when he gets the information he specifically asked for, is that an indication that he is a resident of caves in the Scandinavian mountains...? Maybe a Dovregubben?

Peter

 

He's an NSB 2-8-4?

 
With coupled axles on the trailing truck to maximise booster adhesion...
(Although that didn't last long)
 
No the thing that the locomotive was named after, the "Dovre Giants". These are much the same thing as other people call Trolls...
 
I have a little statue of one, a gift from a Norwegian...
(A model of the locomotive would be more useful)
 
Peter
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 5:16 AM

 

Would this be of interest?

 

https://archive.org/stream/railwaylocomotiv41newy/railwaylocomotiv41newy#page/95/mode/1up

 

 

 Pulverized Coal by Edmund, on Flickr

 Not exactly fluid bed but interesting just the same.

Good Luck, Ed

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 1:19 PM

gmpullman
Would this be of interest? https://archive.org/stream/railwaylocomotiv41newy/railwaylocomotiv41newy#page/95/mode/1up

Well, yes, as would the pulverized-coal system applied to German 05 003 and the whole discussion of StuG firing in Australia (about which I hope Peter Clark will knowingly expound at length).

The thing is that, as with the situation firing Big Boys on subbituminous (or worse!) it is the antithesis of fluidized-bed firing in a critical respect: there is no bed.  Most of these systems work on the general principle of replacing liquid-fuel firing, which creates a plume (ideally incandescent for radiant heat-transfer effectiveness) within the radiant section -- firebox and chamber -- with a plume of combusting solid fuel.  Most of the slurry-firing schemes are similar, adding heat-recovery sections to take up the heat of condensation of the water that fluidized the slurry in the same way the TurboFire XL Donlee boiler recovered the enthalpy involved in steam injection to reduce NOx.

The point of the fluidized bed is that the primary airflow and pattern is precisely regulated so that the fuel stays within a thick firebed, roughly comparable on a locomotive to the depth used for GPCS, but is levitated so the particles don't manage to rest against each other.  In the presence of ash and external vibration this is not an easy operation to manage.

As an aside: the importance of high gas speed for heat transfer in the tubes of a locomotive boiler was demonstrated very convincingly in tests conducted by the USGS, of all agencies, in 1910, which was very early for this sort of thing.  Part of the advantage is in 'scrubbing' (or a bit more appropriately, using turbulent characteristics to agitate) any thin layer of gas tending to insulate the inside tube wall; I suspect a case could be made for somewhat better contact transfer from solids in the gas stream to the wall but measuring this might be intricate.

The gas plume evolved from a fluidized-bed combustor then becomes a 'once-through' effect in the radiant and convective sections, and there is a certain limit on the lb/hr that can be fired even with forced-draft enhancement because smaller combustion particles that leave the bed must combust completely within the time and path of flight up to the rear tubeplate.  This implies a much lower 'grate limit' analogue for functional fluidized-bed firing on locomotives than either conventional 'forcing' of a solid-fuel boiler or high oil/PC firing can generate.

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 1:56 PM

Overmod
whole discussion of StuG firing in Australia

Must be an acronym for something other than the usual usage:  Sturmgeschütz, i.e., various German Wehrmacht turretless assault guns/tank destroyers used in WWII?  Whistling

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,568 posts
Posted by CandOforprogress2 on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 3:24 PM

So Fluidized Coal Combustion is only at this time feasible in stationary engineering applications? aka the Boiler in my grandfather state Hospital or School ?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, August 1, 2018 12:12 AM

charlie hebdo
Must be an acronym for something other than the usual usage

It is.  Here "StuG" is an abbreviation for 'Studiengesellschaft'; it refers to the group that developed the approach to PC firing, I believe in the '20s.  (Associated with Henschel, but carried on as a separate 'corporation')  I no longer have access to my notes on this, but we've had a number of threads on the subject that contain the information.

Here are a couple of PDFs with much of the information anyone interested in the subject will need:

https://www.advanced-steam.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/R707-Conversion-to-PBC-Dust-Firing.pdf

https://www.advanced-steam.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Brown-Coal-Dust-Firing-for-Locomotives.pdf

Alert readers may remember the Snuff Dipper described in Trains many years ago: this was my pre-Internet introduction to the wonders of the Fuller-Lehigh pulverized-fuel system, and for those with access to the Complete Collection is still a cautionary tale worth reading.

 

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Wednesday, August 1, 2018 12:18 AM

M636C
With coupled axles on the trailing truck to maximise booster adhesion... (Although that didn't last long)

No the thing that the locomotive was named after, the "Dovre Giants". These are much the same thing as other people call Trolls... I have a little statue of one, a gift from a Norwegian...

(A model of the locomotive would be more useful)

Peter

I figured as much, but couldn't resist a joke like that...

Those two-axle inside bearing trailing trucks look odd to me.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, August 1, 2018 12:56 AM

NorthWest
Those two-axle inside bearing trailing trucks look odd to me.

Especially if containing all the conjugation stuff to power both axles from a booster: quartered cranks or some kind of gear or belt drive, plus the usual bull gear for the disengageable rocker drive...

There were a number of European designs going right back to Golsdorf that had those inside-bearing trailing trucks.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy