Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
Dear Paul, with big interest read your calcs. We also have to consider some variable factors (cold weather, slippery rails occured, non so feasible conditions). They also used 3 different throttle/cut-off settings during the tests, the lightest train at 3500tons showing better fuel consumption results. This fits nicely to the originally task of taking a 3600tons train unassisted to Wasatch and not to overload steam-locomotives. We only may ask, what did they had in their mind to set the ratings at Wasatch up to 4450tons later? Any plausible explanation? Cheers lars
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag