Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
tenders
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
i always wondered why the rear(water end) of the tender is always lower than the front (fuel) end. water is the problem, having to replinish more than fuel. it seems like if the tender was square, it would hold more water. the santa fe 4-8-4 tenders are the exception, or at least they look that way to me, that they may hold more water because the tender is tall on both ends. i think the water capacity is stored under the coal bunker too, but still if the rear end was as tall as the front, it would hold more water??
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy