Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
4 stroke versus 2 stroke
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
OK, I know, I know, 2 stroke is the modern standard for locomotive power. "Market decision" erc etc <br /> <br />My curiousity is, how and why was that ultimate decision come upon? Strictly "hours of operation/cost", or what? <br /> <br />Just based upon my experiances with smaller engines,..one produces more power per stroke at the crank shaft, and the other sounds like a chainsaw. <br /> <br />The latter tends to out perform the former in "high rev" applications, but I seriously doubt those big dukes in an SD-70 or a Dash-9 are high rev. <br /> <br />Thinking back to my childhood, I can remember when you would feel the "ooomph" of a diesels engine as it went by, the ground would shake, and the exhaust seemed to shake the sky with that power,,,I guess those were Alco's,.... though at the time I was too young to give a darn. <br /> <br />If the current ambitions are towards ever more horse power, why has no one brought a 4 cycle engine into the foray?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy