Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Harriman, et al
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Forgive my ignorance, but in context with the S,P,& S article in the magazine, Harriman controlled the Southern Pacific, as well as the UP? <br /> <br />I had fairly well digested the J.J. Hill dynasty of GN,NP, and Burington, and took the discovery of S,P,& S being yet another of his far flung exploits as a learning eexperiance. <br /> <br />But if SP was a pawn of UP, then how could the late 80's proposed merger of Santa Fe and SP have been a possibility? <br /> <br />Forgive my ignorance, but heavens to Uncle Pete batman!!
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy