Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Mergers, abandonments, limited capacity, and the taxpayer,...OH MY!!
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
A theme that I've often seen to come up editorially in trains magazine generally plays some version of ~Highways are near gridlock, America is choking, rail lines are maxing out in capacity,.. ---SOOOOO, the TAXPAYER needs to build additional capacity for the freight railroads, as a patriotic duty to country and flag~ (well, ok the last part might be a bit of a stretch, but it generally is portrayed as what is "best for the country"). <br /> <br />While admitting there have been some success stories (Alameda corridor, etc) I can't help thinking about the potential for such a strategy to "pork barrel" if left to multiply without a very watchful eye on the big picture. <br /> <br />I live in Indiana which in the consolidation era has been called the most 'overbuilt' state in america, railroad wise. And to some extent that is probably true, since all the eastern roads needed to go through Indiana to have a terminus in Chicago. <br /> <br />Oddly enough, back in the preconsolidation era, many of those lines were put to use. Since that 'golden era', as your remaining big two in the east have gobbled up parallel and competing lines, "capacity" has been seen as expendable, and lines have been pulled up and sold for scrap value. <br /> <br />I think that in some of those instances where the lines have been pulled up, the real value obtained has been the removal of a line that a competitor will never be able to use against them, with the residual value if the scrap being an entirely secondary issue. <br /> <br />Am I completely off base in my view that if the post merger mega giants can see existing parallel lines as "surplus" to the extent that they pull up the spikes and cash in on the steal (pun intended), that they have no business coming back later whining about how the taxpayer owes them funding to add capacity to the lines remaining?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy