Trains.com

Bering Strait Railroad Tunnel

7957 views
50 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Friday, March 4, 2005 10:42 AM
the technology to address ice exists:

"The 12.9 kilometre Confederation Bridge joins Borden-Carleton, Prince Edward Island and Cape Jourimain, New-Brunswick and is the longest bridge over ice covered waters in the world. This historic bridge, which opened on May 31, 1997 brings a new age of transportation to Atlantic Canada. The Bridge carries two lanes of traffic 24 hours a day, seven days a week and takes approximately 10 minutes to cross at normal travelling speeds. The Bridge is privately managed, maintained and operated by Strait Crossing Development Inc. and its subsidiary company, Strait Crossing Bridge Limited."

But I put a tunnel in the same file as the "flat earth theory".

dd
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Friday, March 4, 2005 10:16 AM
First off, even if this thing was built once the trains arrived in Alaska, where would they go? The Alaska RR doesnt have a line into Canada or to the lower 48.

Second, getting a rail line TO the Bering Strait would involve hundreds of miles of track to be layed on now not-so-permafrost soil, which would mean you would essentantially building a bridge a 1000 miles long over the mushy tundra to even reach it.

Third, this is one of the most active siesmic zones in the world, not just fault lines but actual continental plates grinding past each other. 8.0 earthquakes are not uncommon, and a tunnel thru shifting continental plate boundries is not only bad, its suicidal!

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, March 4, 2005 10:16 AM
A Bering Strait tunnel definitely has a Russian flavor to it, the Russians have always dreamed of or attempted projects on a heroic scale. However, it looks good on paper but has absolutely no economic justification since it would be a middle with no ends (apologies to fans of Pacific Great Eastern).
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 4, 2005 9:54 AM
At least the Oresund bridge & Messina bridges are in, road & rail, and are working; all European nations, Asia, as well as Canada & The United States should all pay equally for a Bering tunnel or bridge, as the freight benefits would more than justify it all; let`s go for it!
Thanks also to the correspondent who listed the websites re. all this, the last one with the guage difference overcome by off-set four rail layout is most interesting.
Railfans abroad might also be interested in www.heritagerail.com website, as to the diificulties faced in the U.K. in putting back all the missing rail links; there are now over a 100 companies and growing, not just for enthusiasts, but for social needs. where the road transport is inadequate, or non-existant. Let the U.S. railroads not fall into the same trap!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 4, 2005 1:13 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SteamerFan

but then who could afford the massive costs to build it?



Particularly since it would never make back the money invested in it. You'll see Gibraltar and the Strait of Messina bridged centuries before the Bering Strait is.

If a link over the Bering Strait cost the same per kilometer as the Øresund Bridge from Denmark to Sweden, it would run a little over $90 billion.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 3, 2005 10:11 PM
How about connecting Alaska by rail with the rest of North America first? Might make a better economic case for the thing to be built. (I think a bridge makes for a better solution viewing the geophysical description of the region)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 3, 2005 8:54 PM
Who is going to pay for it? Maybe we can take the money from Amtrak?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 3, 2005 1:18 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by GP-9_Man11786

Why not buod a bridge instead of a tunnel?


That's in the works, but the major problem is the ice flows hitting the pylons, but then again, the guy designing it says he's overcome that. I saw a show in the history channel about this, the bridge si to be immense, 3 layers, top would be sesonal road traffice (can't drive cars on it in the harsh winter), second level would be a semi-pressurized railway (4 tracks i believe), third layer would be a natural gas/oil pipeline system. but then who could afford the massive costs to build it?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 3, 2005 1:12 PM
There was an idea for a polar route railroad as the long dreamed of Northwest Passage. Thanks to global warming, the Northwest Passage is opening to shipping. Ice breakers are required for some of it but the whole passage is almost ice free.
1979


2003
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
  • 1,503 posts
Posted by GP-9_Man11786 on Thursday, March 3, 2005 1:01 PM
Why not buod a bridge instead of a tunnel?

Modeling the Pennsylvania Railroad in N Scale.

www.prr-nscale.blogspot.com 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 3, 2005 12:24 PM
Thanks to all, including Topeka Railfan! This is your U.K. correspondent who started the Bering tunnel inquiry, with modern technology, earthquake and change of guage problems should be surmountable...
A rail trip Chinnor (Oxfordshire) to Chicago or Newquay (Cornwall) to New York appeals to me....
Also, talking of new technology, why not re-open Key West, making it storm proof? As to one of your correspondents suggesting old lines be made into truck roads, DON`T LET `EM DO IT..... we lost between a third and half of our railways because of negative thinking in 1965 onwards, now they are regretting it.... If Dubya tries anything like that in the States, let all rail staff call a unanimous general strike in protest, like we should have done. The world`s oil reserves are running out..... rail is the only mass transport viable for the future!
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Thursday, March 3, 2005 11:45 AM
It only took about 150 years from the first attempt at the Channel Tunnel to get to the project completed. I'm not going to hold my breath on the Bering Strait Tunnel.

dd
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Thursday, March 3, 2005 7:26 AM
I would say this is more fantasy then fact as I would suspect due to the past relationship between Russia & us as well as the weaknesses that now exist in the "new" Russia this project will not come to fruitation.

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, March 3, 2005 3:16 AM
It would be a matter more of railroading prestige. Frits let us connect Alaska for gosh sakes! That at least is doable and should have the traffic to justify it.
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 592 posts
Posted by 88gta350 on Thursday, March 3, 2005 3:00 AM
That area is prone to severe earthquales. I can't imagine it is very feasible. You'd build one heck of an expensive tunnel for questionable amounts of traffic only to have it collapse in a few years.
Dave M
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Thursday, March 3, 2005 1:29 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Hugh Jampton

QUOTE: Originally posted by dldance

Why build one? Intermodal container ships are much cheaper and avoid all the permafrost issues. Because rail guages are not compatible.

dd


Ships are slow. Manufacturers of high value goods can free up a lot of capital if they can get the products to market quicker.
The incompatibility of gauge is minor compared to the problems of tunnelling across tectonic plate boundaries.


Hugh, I hate to be a "nay-sayer", but train speeds in that part of the world are slower than a tramp steamer and you are also adding about 4 thousand miles to the trip. The engineering is doable. The economics are not.
Eric
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Thursday, March 3, 2005 1:22 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dldance

Why build one? Intermodal container ships are much cheaper and avoid all the permafrost issues. Because rail guages are not compatible.

dd


Ships are slow. Manufacturers of high value goods can free up a lot of capital if they can get the products to market quicker.
The incompatibility of gauge is minor compared to the problems of tunnelling across tectonic plate boundaries.
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Thursday, March 3, 2005 1:16 AM
Seems like there is a question of traffic. Alaska Air flew from Anchorage into Soviet territory during Yeltson's time, but there was almost no freight or passengers. They don't have the route anymore. They used a DC9 and sometimes a 737.
Eric
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: US
  • 383 posts
Posted by CG9602 on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 9:59 PM
http://whynot.net/view_idea.php?id=1695
http://www.arctic.net/~snnr/tunnel/
http://home.att.net/~Berliner-Ultrasonics/strunnel.html
http://www.pressbox.co.uk/Detailed/7777.html
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2908ibero_ldbge.html
ttp://www.alaskahistoricalsociety.org/Cole%20bridge%20to%20Siberia.htm

These links should give you a start on your little project. As you can see, it is something that has been discussed from time to time, most recently during the 1990s with the fall of Soviet Russia.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 9:20 PM
Why build one? Intermodal container ships are much cheaper and avoid all the permafrost issues. Because rail guages are not compatible.

dd
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 9:18 PM
I know GWB was thinking about it, but he decide to "REFORM" SSI instead.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Bering Strait Railroad Tunnel
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 8:39 PM
I asked a UK rail group for information about the railways of the UK. One of our British friends asked me for "Stateside information on the Bering Tunnel". A quick search and I found a website about a optomistic plan to build a tunnel between Alaska and Siberia and to connect the Eastern Hemisphere with the Western Hemisphere by rail.

So, in the spirit of cooperation with one of our closest allies, does anyone have any information on this project?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy