Trains.com

Autonomous Truck Success

9309 views
97 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, February 10, 2023 8:48 PM

There's always tethering your self-propelled mower so it winds itself up on a stake...

Of course, farmers are now using GPS when seeding, and other such functions.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, February 10, 2023 6:23 PM

The church next to one of our feed mills has a couple robotic lawnmowers.  Always get a kick seeing them out and about at 3am running around. 

You were just ahead of your time. 

 

Kind of like how Swanson's was the original Ubereats. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, February 10, 2023 9:50 AM

When I was a kid my dad, my brother, and I patented a self driving lawnmower. We had a prototype built, and it worked like a charm. That was 40 plus years ago. Unfortunately it wasn't commercially viable.. And so it is with alot of technology.. it may work somewhat (or very well) but if the economics don't make sense it goes nowhere. 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, February 9, 2023 6:04 AM

Overmod

 

 
Euclid
All of the changes are on the locomotives.

 

Even if this were so -- and it is not -- it doesn't take a whit away from the point zug was making.  Assuming you actually read what he said, and understood it.

 

 

It is completely true in the original context I provided.
 
I read Zug's comment several times, and understand it just fine.  I thought about my reply and composed it off the forum and proof read it.  He made more than one point.  My main point was related to his comment about railcars getting beat up by customers at their loading/receiving facilities.  I thought that point carried over to his last sentence, so I did not include in the quote these middle sentences by Zug:
 
'cause that stuff is going to last more than 3 hours once it gets to an industry or shortline. 
 
I don't think most people have ever seen how many industries handle their cars. Hell hath no fury as a trackmobile, forklift, or front end loader..
 
My comment, "All of the changes are on the locomotives" was intended to mean in the context of his concern about railcars getting damaged by customers and thus imposing increased cost for autonomous running equipment because of its presence on railcars.  
 
The largest context was from the preceding comment that Zug was replying to, which included the idea that comprehensive sensors be added as part of an autonomous conversion.  So, because most of those sensors would be on the railcars, I assumed Zug was referring to those sensors being damaged by careless abuse of railcars by the shippers, as part of the cost of autonomous running.  
 
So I said: "All of the changes [for autonomous operation] are on the locomotives” [as opposed to the railcars].  My assumption about autonomous running is that it does not fundamentally include compressive sensors for railcars.  That is a separate agenda that is very popular just as autonomous running is.  
 
But other than my specific focus, my comment did not mean to exclude all of the changes required for autonomous running that would be needed for the entire system excluding railcars.  As I mentioned earlier, there will be more changes needed for autonomous running than just equipping locomotives for it.  I believe the greatest cost will be in the area of revising methods of operation and train composition that will be required (and enabled) by autonomous running. I believe this will be the greatest area of expense by far.   
 
Generally the still larger context/premise seems to be that the railroads cannot afford autonomous operation.   
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, February 8, 2023 12:45 PM

Overmod
 
Euclid
All of the changes are on the locomotives. 

Even if this were so -- and it is not -- it doesn't take a whit away from the point zug was making.  Assuming you actually read what he said, and understood it.

Euc - you forget under PSR any maintenance is too much for the financial model.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, February 8, 2023 11:07 AM

Euclid
All of the changes are on the locomotives.

Even if this were so -- and it is not -- it doesn't take a whit away from the point zug was making.  Assuming you actually read what he said, and understood it.

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Wednesday, February 8, 2023 9:28 AM

Saw a Nova episode on Britain's Crossrail (Elizabeth Line) project. 13 years and 25 billion. Quite a segment on the software system problems encountered including autonomous movements. On Amazon Prime and PBS. 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 6:34 PM

zugmann

 

 
rdamon
A full investment in automation should include an electric trainline with speed and temperature sensors on each axle, electric brakes.  Make the car individually addressable so the computer can lock out on any high temp or brake issue.  Another benefit is they can put some LED lights on the side to help with people driving into the train at a dark crossing.

To run anything udner any guise of automation, you are going to have to spend big money on maintaining stuff.  Not exactly the expert field of many companies anymore.   RR or not. 

Adding autonomous running will cost a lot of money, but it would not necessarily include that currently popular push for adding sensors to everything imaginable on the train.  It also does not have to include changing to ECP brakes.  All of the changes are on the locomotives.

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 5:52 PM

Isn't it really a case of trying to be too efficient?  Squeezing the last trace of what's possible out of people and equipment.  Why can't the goal be to be unquestionably reliable?

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 5:10 PM

rdamon
A full investment in automation should include an electric trainline with speed and temperature sensors on each axle, electric brakes.  Make the car individually addressable so the computer can lock out on any high temp or brake issue.  Another benefit is they can put some LED lights on the side to help with people driving into the train at a dark crossing.

'cause that stuff is going to last more than 3 hours once it gets to an industry or shortline. 

I don't think most people have ever seen how many industries handle their cars. Hell hath no fury as a trackmobile, forklift, or front end loader..

 

To run anything udner any guise of automation, you are going to have to spend big money on maintaining stuff.  Not exactly the expert field of many companies anymore.   RR or not. 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 3:00 PM

BaltACD

Movement ultimately has accidents.  No matter, who, where, what or when.

Thats why many older folks wear DEPENDS. 

 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 2:38 PM
Rail management is mostly enthusiastic about driverless freight trains.  Like the driverless car and truck movement, rail management promotes the automation as a means to increase safety.  The premise is that autonomous trains will not suffer from human error. 
 
The biggest obstacle to autonomous freight trains will be the Labor Unions because they oppose the loss of jobs that will result from driverless trains.  And aside from improving safety, the real reason management is on board with driverless trains is that they reduce labor.  It wasn’t hard to see this coming. 
  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 1:19 PM

tree68

 

 
charlie hebdo
Those responses to this are much akin to saying "s***" happens" aka let's not do anything because we have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, i.e. saving jobs versus saving lives. 

 

Methinks it's more like discounting any claims that autonomous operation will be safer.  This incident likely would have occurred if there was a five person crew.  

Absent more defect detectors (one halfway between the others might have caught the problem), this was a failure that may not have been caught by better maintenance.  Many defects remain hidden, until they aren't.  

 

Discounting without any empirical evidence while this accident is vivid evidence of serious malfeasance in the whole system. The move to larger, much heavier railcars and monster trains generated more profits at the expense of more equipment and track failures.

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 12:21 PM

charlie hebdo
Those responses to this are much akin to saying "s***" happens" aka let's not do anything because we have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, i.e. saving jobs versus saving lives. 

Methinks it's more like discounting any claims that autonomous operation will be safer.  This incident likely would have occurred if there was a five person crew.  

Absent more defect detectors (one halfway between the others might have caught the problem), this was a failure that may not have been caught by better maintenance.  Many defects remain hidden, until they aren't.  

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 12:13 PM

A full investment in automation should include an electric trainline with speed and temperature sensors on each axle, electric brakes.  Make the car individually addressable so the computer can lock out on any high temp or brake issue. 

Another benefit is they can put some LED lights on the side to help with people driving into the train at a dark crossing.

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 11:19 AM

Those responses to this are much akin to saying "s***" happens" aka let's not do anything because we have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, i.e. saving jobs versus saving lives.  Same old stuff concerning crossings, equipment, accounting etc. Reminiscent of the worse tragedies in Decatur, eastern Canada, etc 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 10:25 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH
charlie hebdo

The recent and serious NS derailment once again exposed the fallacy of superiority of human crews. Also shows rails to be dangerous neighbors to have.

Not the point he's trying to make.  The point is that you can't argue that autonomous operation would have been 'less safe' under the accident conditions.
 
As I recall, some of the discussion of proposed 'key train' speed restrictions in the Feinberg era noted that they would reduce the danger to 'neighbors'.  In the brave new world of notch-5-max PTC, perhaps some form of the discussion could be revisited...
 
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 10:25 AM

Movement ultimately has accidents.  No matter, who, where, what or when.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 9:57 AM

charlie hebdo

The recent and serious NS derailment once again exposed the fallacy of superiority of human crews. Also shows rails to be dangerous neighbors to have.

 
And just how would autonomous operation have prevented this derailment?
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    February 2018
  • From: Flyover Country
  • 5,557 posts
Posted by York1 on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 9:22 AM

Pipeline opponents continue to require us to move huge amounts of oil by rail.

York1 John       

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 8:49 AM

The recent and serious NS derailment once again exposed the fallacy of superiority of human crews. Also shows rails to be dangerous neighbors to have.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 8:22 AM

Erik_Mag
My wife's car has a very nice camera for the "rearview mirroe" and backing up assistance. Even though it's facing backwards, it still require cleaning on a regular basis.

My daughter's car has a back-up camera (seems to be a regular feature these days) as well as obstacle sensing - and she still managed to clip my truck (parked in her driveway) while backing out of her garage.

No damage to my truck, and minimal damage to her bumper.  

I would imagine that the bird poop incident is making some designers look at the design to see if it can somehow be improved.

But remember the Pinto...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 7:39 AM
Without interrupting service, railroad companies sometimes changed their gage.  They also equipped there entire fleets of rolling stock with automatic air brakes, replaced their link & pin couplers with automatic couplers, and replaced their entire steam locomotive rosters with diesels.  Double-heading of locomotives in the steam age was replaced by M.U. locomotives in the diesel age.  Now that has been supplemented by D.P.U. operation to further reduce manpower needed to move the freight traffic. 
 
So I doubt they will throw in the towel when faced with the challenge of bird poop. 
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, February 6, 2023 10:30 PM

Erik_Mag
 
Shadow the Cats owner

Well one of those automonus trucks was taken offline by a bird. 

Why am I not surprised? Looks like the designer didn't think of various things that go splat on windshields. Which also implies that the people trying to design an autonomous truck need a lot more real world experience. Pretty much the same thing goes for autonomous trains.

My wife's car has a very nice camera for the "rearview mirroe" and backing up assistance. Even though it's facing backwards, it still require cleaning on a regular basis.

Like anything else - the Devil is in the details and there are more details than can be thought of - until the detail hits.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • 1,686 posts
Posted by Erik_Mag on Monday, February 6, 2023 10:14 PM

Shadow the Cats owner

Well one of those automonus trucks was taken offline by a bird.

Why am I not surprised? Looks like the designer didn't think of various things that go splat on windshields. Which also implies that the people trying to design an autonomous truck need a lot more real world experience. Pretty much the same thing goes for autonomous trains.

My wife's car has a very nice camera for the "rearview mirroe" and backing up assistance. Even though it's facing backwards, it still require cleaning on a regular basis.

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Monday, February 6, 2023 4:17 PM

Well one of those automonus trucks was taken offline by a bird.  The bird dropped off a present that hit the camera covering it with poop and the truck literally shutdown in the middle of the interstate and even the guy monitoring it inside couldn't get it to move.  

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Monday, February 6, 2023 4:16 PM

I was suprised that PTC did not include some sort of overhead or between the rails beacon to identify track at CPs

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, February 6, 2023 1:51 PM

Whatever it is, it is going to cost BIG bucks, especially when you consider that something that will be this sensitive is going to have to hold up in a hostile environment. 

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Monday, February 6, 2023 12:40 PM
I found the video I referred to above.
 
Look at this video starting at time 1:00
 
 
It explains how the train location is known automatically to within a few centimeters.  It uses a fixed signal sent from the track every 25 meters of track length.  So the train detects this signal every 25 meters that it travels.  Then for finer sensing input, it counts wheel revolutions within the track length between the 25 meter signals. 
 
Now this is for transit, so maybe the track wire is considered cost effective, but using this wire for thousands of miles of mainline may be objectionable.  Or maybe not.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy