Trains.com

UP's Mega Coal Trains' concerns in Racine

8379 views
85 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, May 26, 2019 8:39 PM

tree68
 
blhanel
Just watched an empty westbound coal on the Rochelle webcam- ONE engine pulling 140 cars!
 
I've told this story before...

Whilst watching ICG in Rantoul one night, I saw a rather dim headlight off to the north.  It wasn't coming very fast.

When the train finally got to Rantoul (I was on the station platform), there were two locomotives.  I don't recall if they were four or six axle - I lean toward four.   But they were on their knees.  It's a long upgrade into Rantoul southbound.

On a whim, I started counting cars.  There were 196 empty coal hoppers.

ICG usually ran their coal trains at around 100 cars at the time, and the empties the same.  This was clearly two trains worth of empties.

All I could figure was that they were short of power on the north end, so sent the two trains south as one, and vastly underpowered.

I worked with the operations of Willard, OH in two eras over 30 years apart.  They did the same things.  10 minutes before The Capitol Limited Eastbound(in B&O days) was scheduled to depart On Time - they JUST HAD TO RUN 200 Rattlers (B&LE double clasp braked empty hoppers) ahead of the Cap - 2 F7's and 200 emptys that might make 30 MPH down an elevator shaft.  Later before the On Time departure of Amtrak's Three Rivers they JUST HAD TO RUN 200 empty hoppers behind a SD-40 and a Dash-8.  Some things never change - the people change - the operational mentality doesn't.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Sunday, May 26, 2019 3:18 PM

blhanel
Just watched an empty westbound coal on the Rochelle webcam- ONE engine pulling 140 cars!

I've told this story before...

Whilst watching ICG in Rantoul one night, I saw a rather dim headlight off to the north.  It wasn't coming very fast.

When the train finally got to Rantoul (I was on the station platform), there were two locomotives.  I don't recall if they were four or six axle - I lean toward four.   But they were on their knees.  It's a long upgrade into Rantoul southbound.

On a whim, I started counting cars.  There were 196 empty coal hoppers.

ICG usually ran their coal trains at around 100 cars at the time, and the empties the same.  This was clearly two trains worth of empties.

All I could figure was that they were short of power on the north end, so sent the two trains south as one, and vastly underpowered.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Saturday, May 25, 2019 4:08 PM

blhanel
Just watched an empty westbound coal on the Rochelle webcam- ONE engine pulling 140 cars!

invest in air compressor stock?

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Saturday, May 25, 2019 10:37 AM

jeffhergert

The empties had been returning in two trains.  Now they are starting to run them back west in larger quantities.  One empty I met today had 200 cars.  I don't know what happened to the other 69 or 70 cars.  Maybe being changed out for maintenance or something.  They have experimented with running empties back in large numbers before.  I remember one where they got 3 knuckles on one train, then a fourth when putting it back together.  IIRC, this was before DP was available.

Just watched an empty westbound coal on the Rochelle webcam- ONE engine pulling 140 cars!

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Friday, May 24, 2019 12:01 PM
This is a redo of my post from which Jeff could not quote.  And BTW Jeff, FWIW, I could not do anything to the post either; when I tried to do a quote, it got all messed up.
 
Carl, unless the crew cut off one of the head end engines and used it as 'transportation' to get to the other end, it would certainly be a long walk for the crew, especially if it was one of those 270-car monsters, and even more so in winter. 
During the 'changing ends', since handbrakes could not be applied, what about securing the train for a 30-minute+ walk (longer during snow season)? That is a fairly steep grade past St. Francis heading towards the lakefront. And no way would it be feasible if it were a one-person crew.
 
The best way would be with a crew with 2 qualified Engineers and power on both ends. As the train headed past the clearance point, Engineer 1 drops off Engineer 2 and pulls past while # 2 waits for the other end to arrive. When #2 has the engine ready for leading, #1 cuts out the head end. Then #2 runs the train south to Oak Creek, where #1 then pulls the train north in to the plant. However, that would necessitate #1 having to cut off his own engine and throw his own switches—not a big deal in summer, but in winter, with frozen, snow-filled switches, one person out there alone in -20 degree windy weather is not a good idea from a safety standpoint.
 
And not only that, how would that be done with the mid-train power? Remember, #2 is still on the south end of the train, unless when the train got to Oak Creek, the crew again changed operational ends, and then #1 just shoves the train blindly south with #2 waiting at the switch in to the plant.
 
Easiest and best of all would be to simply doing what has been successfully done for many decades: run one reasonably-sized train with one crew, point-to-point. No issues. No problems. No complications. Done. 
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Thursday, May 23, 2019 9:55 PM

Regarding Carl and Zardoz's discussion.  For some reason I can't quote Zardoz's last post, but it will allow me to quote other's postings.

That 3 mile walk is going to be more in the neighborhood of an hour in good weather.  That's why we have vans, unless they are all busy doing something else. 

For an engineer to throw his own switch, he first has to secure the engines and train before getting on the ground.  You can't go very far from the power unless everything is secured.  If it's a facing point close to the engine, maybe you would be OK.  If a trailing point, definitely not.  (I used to get my own switches, even operated the release box at an automatic interlocking that sometimes gets used multiple times when putting together large trains at one yard, often it wouldn't reclear.  Now if that interlocking is red, the conductor or utility man has to come operate it.  Adds about 30 to 40 minutes, but once engineers started getting written up for getting away from the power, no more getting off the power to do such duties.)

To change ends on a DP train you'll have to unlink and relink everything, which means getting on all locomotive consists.  You could probably unlink and relink as you went, but you would need to get on all the consists everytime you changed ends.

The empties had been returning in two trains.  Now they are starting to run them back west in larger quantities.  One empty I met today had 200 cars.  I don't know what happened to the other 69 or 70 cars.  Maybe being changed out for maintenance or something.  They have experimented with running empties back in large numbers before.  I remember one where they got 3 knuckles on one train, then a fourth when putting it back together.  IIRC, this was before DP was available.

Jeff 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 23, 2019 1:57 PM

Convicted One
 
Murphy Siding
if the DM&E had been able to find financing and go forward, the end result might have paralleled the lifespan and eventual demise of the Milwaukee Road.

 

Perhaps they had some idea that coal was about to become an enviromental boogey-man in the next presidency? 

 

That sinking feeling you get when you put all your eggs in one basket and realize that a dinosaur is about to step on it sort of thing?Surprise

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, May 23, 2019 11:40 AM

CShaveRR

Jim, you wouldn't even have to run around the train if you could make the hind-end DPU the controlling unit for those last few miles.  


Carl, unless the crew cut off one of the head end engines and used it as 'transportation' to get to the other end, it would certainly be a long walk for the crew, especially if it was one of those 270-car monsters, and even more so in winter. 
During the 'changing ends', since handbrakes could not be applied, what about securing the train for a 30-minute+ walk (longer during snow season)? That is a fairly steep grade past St. Francis heading towards the lakefront. And no way would it be feasible if it were a one-person crew.
 The best way would be with a crew with 2 qualified Engineers and power on both ends. As the train headed past the clearance point, Engineer 1 drops off Engineer 2 and pulls past while # 2 waits for the other end to arrive. When #2 has the engine ready for leading, #1 cuts out the head end. Then #2 runs the train south to Oak Creek, where #1 then pulls the train north in to the plant. However, that would necessitate #1 having to cut off his own engine and throw his own switches—not a big deal in summer, but in winter, with frozen, snow-filled switches, one person out there alone in -20 degree windy weather is not a good idea from a safety standpoint.
 And not only that, how would that be done with the mid-train power? Remember, #2 is still on the south end of the train, unless when the train got to Oak Creek, the crew again changed operational ends, and then #1 just shoves the train blindly south with #2 waiting at the switch in to the plant.
 Easiest and best of all would be to simply doing what has been successfully done for many decades: run one reasonably-sized train with one crew, point-to-point. No issues. No problems. No complications. Done.
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, May 23, 2019 10:29 AM

Murphy Siding
if the DM&E had been able to find financing and go forward, the end result might have paralleled the lifespan and eventual demise of the Milwaukee Road.

Perhaps they had some idea that coal was about to become an enviromental boogey-man in the next presidency? 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, May 23, 2019 10:24 AM

Murphy Siding
I saw that more as a face-saving move by the DM&E folks so they wouldn’t actually have to admit defeat.    

Never thought about it that way. You might be right.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 23, 2019 10:21 AM

Convicted One
 
Murphy Siding
, mostly financial issues caused the Powder River Basin extension to be nothing more than a dream for the DM&E

 

Wasn't there a little flim-flammery involved also? CP's purchase price had contingencies built in. They paid like $1.5 billion up front, but would be required to pay like another $1 billion when the powder river extension was eventually built. Which of course never happened, and likely never will now that CP has spun off the western end of the old D,M,&E. 

 

For what it's worth, I think if the DM&E had been able to find financing and go forward, the end result might have paralleled the lifespan and eventual demise of the Milwaukee Road. Sigh

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 23, 2019 10:17 AM

Convicted One
 
Murphy Siding
, mostly financial issues caused the Powder River Basin extension to be nothing more than a dream for the DM&E

 

Wasn't there a little flim-flammery involved also? CP's purchase price had contingencies built in. They paid like $1.5 billion up front, but would be required to pay like another $1 billion when the powder river extension was eventually built. Which of course never happened, and likely never will now that CP has spun off the western end of the old D,M,&E. 

 

 I don’t know about flim-flammery per se. I saw that more as a face-saving move by the DM&E folks so they wouldn’t actually have to admit defeat.  

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, May 23, 2019 10:08 AM

Murphy Siding
, mostly financial issues caused the Powder River Basin extension to be nothing more than a dream for the DM&E

Wasn't there a little flim-flammery involved also? CP's purchase price had contingencies built in. They paid like $1.5 billion up front, but would be required to pay like another $1 billion when the powder river extension was eventually built. Which of course never happened, and likely never will now that CP has spun off the western end of the old D,M,&E. 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, May 23, 2019 9:44 AM

Overmod
I think it's more likely that they objected to the noise or general inconvenience of increased train traffic.

As I recall, one of their specific objections was that vibration would affect sensitive instruments in use.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 8:06 PM

Lithonia Operator

Who won? Mayo or the railroad?

 

While it's not accurate to say that Mayo won, it is fair to say the Dakota Minnesota & Iowa Railroad lost. The battle with Mayo and other, mostly financial issues caused the Powder River Basin extension to be nothing more than a dream for the DM&E

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 7:40 PM

BaltACD is right on the advertised again. And there is one more in Scottsdale. AZ.

All three campuses are linked with an amazing array of communications and imaging devices.

They work on the basis of group diagnosis. Doctors will consult with each other for verification of their diagnosis. They have seen just about everything and so through team doctoring they can usually get it right. One astounding statisic I read was that a large majority of patients referred to the Mayo Clinic come with a particular diagnosis but actually leave with a different diagnosis. It is an amazing, life-saving organization.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 7:14 PM

Deggesty
Yes, Overmod, your explanation seems better than  mine. I have the impression that most who go to the Mayp Clinic go after it seems that no other facility has been able to give them the help they need.

There is also a Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, FL.  Same organization, different location.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 1:22 PM

Yes, Overmod, your explanation seems better than  mine. I have the impression that most who go to the Mayp Clinic go after it seems that no other facility has been able to give them the help they need.

Johnny

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 12:59 PM

kgbw49
The Chicago Great Western also served Rochester on a secondary main line that ran through Rochester on a roughly north-south alignment.

I'm astounded you did not mention the Bluebird when saying this.

(Incidentally, since one of the three cars of that train survives, in Nevada of all places, I would welcome a 'restoration' effort... the Bluebird is one of the great formative events in the history of streamliners in general, in fact more significant than anything Budd built up to the Pioneer Zephyr.  It's in a parlous state, but I've seen steam locomotives far worse restored to operation.)

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 12:45 PM

Johnny, you are correct regarding the first responder concern. There was much discussion of first responder delays and the need for additional gradeseparations to address ambulance and fire concerns.

As to passenger stations, back in the day Rochester was served by the Chicago & Northwestern main line to Rapid City, SD. That line runs on an east-west alignment through Rochester and is now part of Canadian Pacific. Trains such as the Dakota 400 would travel at speeds up to 90 mph on the line. The C&NW station was just three small blocks north of the Mayo Clinic. Most of the patients arrived by rail prior to the growth of air travel and the Interstate Highway System. The C&NW station is no longer in existence.

The Chicago Great Western also served Rochester on a secondary main line that ran through Rochester on a roughly north-south alignment. The depot was about 4 small blocks east of the Mayo Clinic across the Zumbro River. The depot is still in existence and sits along a remnant of the former main that extends to south Rochester to serve a lumber supplier, a scrapyard, and a frozen foods producer. The depot is now a restaurant.

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,768 posts
Posted by MMLDelete on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 12:05 PM

Who won? Mayo or the railroad?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 11:45 AM

Deggesty
Possibly because such extension of train length could substantially delay an ambulance that is transporting a patient to the clinic?

I don't think many of the people at the Mayo Clinic are arriving on an emergency basis, or in a condition that poses danger from waiting at a crossing.  They're not that sort of outfit...

I think it's more likely that they objected to the noise or general inconvenience of increased train traffic.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 11:20 AM

Lithonia Operator

Could someone explain the references to the Mayo Clinic?

 

Possibly because such extension of train lenght could  substantially delay an ambulance that is transporting a patient to the clinic?

Non-related question: how close was the CNW station to the cliinic? I think of the two cars that had a door in the side opposite a bedroom door  that Pullman built for overnight service from Chicago.

Johnny

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 9:43 AM

Jim, you wouldn't even have to run around the train if you could make the hind-end DPU the controlling unit for those last few miles.  

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 9:28 AM

Mayo Clinic was opposed to the DM&E proposed expansion of 1.5-mile-long coal trains through Rochester back in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

 

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,768 posts
Posted by MMLDelete on Tuesday, May 21, 2019 11:19 PM

Could someone explain the references to the Mayo Clinic?

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, May 21, 2019 9:11 AM

Flintlock76
Balt makes a good point, and maybe  there's some things Racine can do that they're not doing

I can't imagine what Racine could do, other than either what Kenosha did years ago--elevate the tracks, or have a new rail line built to bypass the entire city. Even if the old Milwaukee Road track from Waxdale into the city were rebuilt, those tracks enter Racine on the south side, so the trains would still have to head north through town. Either that, or build a totally new line from the Milwaukee sub to Oak Creek.

The best way would be for the trains to head north to St. Francis on the Milwaukee sub, run past the interlocking and head towards downtown, run around the train, and then head south to Oak Creek. Even if the move necessitated the need for an additional crew, it would be far cheaper than building new track.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Monday, May 20, 2019 7:50 PM

Flintlock76
You don't poke a hornets nest with a stick!   You're  going to lose, not the hornets.

How about: Never expect to be able to teach a pig to sing, you'll only waste your time and annoy them pig.

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Monday, May 20, 2019 9:36 AM

Balt makes a good point, and maybe  there's some things Racine can do that they're not doing, but the fact remains someone at UP hasn't learned the lesson most of us learn as kids, either the hard way or by example, which is...

You don't poke a hornets nest with a stick!   You're  going to lose, not the hornets.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, May 20, 2019 9:23 AM

Euclid
... Railroads built into undeveloped territory in the hope of settling it and handling its transportation needs.  The focal points of that new settlement are today’s towns.  They don’t owe the railroads anything.  Without the settlement, the railroads would not exist.

This is less a moral question than a purely legal one -- the modern towns don't owe the railroad anything, and its government and residents alike probably, by and large, now see the railroad only as a dangerous nuisance that splits their community.  The days when a railroad contributed more than occasional switching to a few facilities are long gone, and we can bewail that as railfans but I doubt it makes any difference to most townspeople.  As well try to argue that Southerners have residual 'privilege' from the days of chattel slavery.  Now is now. And the usual question will be some variant of 'what have you done for me lately' with the railroad giving a very lame answer at best.

Whether or not the railroad has 'priority' under law means nothing with respect to 'accidental' blockage of crossings for more than the few minutes -- often allotted in local statutes -- a train is allowed to block a crossing in a given town.  There is no Federal rule or priority that disallows a town to require a crew to break a train at one or more crossings after a given (usually fairly short; 10-15 minute) time standing.  These statutes were likely written and passed in the 'old days' of multiple-person crews and relatively short trains -- I'd be surprised if the crew could even get to the rear end of a doubled coal train (even with motorized aid!) within the appropriate time to set up and break.  We won't take up the issue whether the towns understand about brake tests and full inspection after emergency application ... they wouldn't want to hear it anyway.

Once again, this demonstrates the importance of having either a 'bridge capability' in the PTC SDRs, or providing some effective way to establish good communications between the train crew and specific local communities and first response departments.  Even a little warning might allow considerable cooperation between railroaders and town to get roads open or trains underway 'timely'.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy