Trains.com

Amtrak Wreck in Philadelphia

70033 views
1561 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Saturday, May 16, 2015 12:08 PM

Not trying to start a conspiracy theory but there are four roads that bridge the tracks between the North Philly SEPTA station and the scene of the wreck. There are areas on those bridges where someone could throw rocks or shoot at the train.

That said, I'm waiting to hear what the FBI has to say about the broken windshields.

Norm


  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, May 16, 2015 12:11 PM

It seems to me that if you plow up ballast at 106 mph, the ballast rocks are going to be moving about 106 mph in the same direction as the train.  So I don't see how the train impacts the airborne ballast with enough force to cause much damage.

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Saturday, May 16, 2015 12:14 PM

[eliminated wacky duplicate post]

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, May 16, 2015 12:45 PM

WSJ dsyd Amtrak is to immedialy install signal indications for any  reductions of 20 MPH before restarting service.  Maybe reason not starting service until Tuesday ?

This is same order that MNRR got after its wreck.  Why was Amtrak not so ordered as well ?  FRA incompetence ?

 

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Saturday, May 16, 2015 1:05 PM

Clearly, Engine 601 was in a scenerio of being the irresitable force striking immovable objects. That it stopped in what appears to be a short distance and stay upright (my supposition) is amazing. I have a number of questions that perhaps someone can address. 

1. Throttle. Feeds electical lines that can be connected to other locomotives to either control them or vise versa. My understanding id that there is a selector switch that  put a locomotive in "Master" or "Slave" operation. So I would assume that 601 was in "Master" operation. Then the throttle connects to a processor that actuates relays or other modules that control the electrical propulsion system which I have never read about there being a failure similar to a stuck accelerator (Audi) event. Railroad safety has always been tought to me as "fail-safe" so any thoughts there?

2. Ergonomic. Does the engineer push the throttle forward to accelerate or pull the throttle back to accelerate. Could a reflecive move have caused an erronious operation of the throttle? Any thoughts there? 

Unrelated to this event but recalled because of it, when the D&H was running their PA-4's on Amtrak's Adirondack, I experienced a sensation I had never had before or since. It was south of Albany in the 90 mph section of the NYC line and the train was mking track speed. The coach I was in as we went around some curves felt like something was jolting it from the side. My analogy was a croquet ball being hit with a mallet, like something trying to force the car to turn. This was not a repetitive blow but it did recur multiple times. My mind kept thinking the wheels were trying to climb the rail but the sensation was of a force a from the side of the train, not a vertical force. Any thoughts.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Saturday, May 16, 2015 4:35 PM
How hard is it to throw multiple rocks at a vehicle traveling 60+mph? If rocks were thrown could the person throwing the rocks have gotten off three rocks in a short time period? Unless there were multiple individuals. Or firearms were used. If firearms(rifles, handguns) were used then they would leave at least trace amounts of their existance. Lead or copper trace marks on the richochet locations, or best of all an intact bullet And if this was gunfire the FBI is one of the best organizations at locating and analyzing this. Rgds IGN
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Saturday, May 16, 2015 5:20 PM

Here or on the thread I started I proposed that the engineer's mind was fogged because of a spray due to a terrorist attack.  

Thinking it over, it couldl have just as easily resulted from a slow leak of a gas main, detected before an explosion, but still affecting thought processes, or perhaps a local chemical factory had a problem and the gas cloud was released.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Saturday, May 16, 2015 6:04 PM

Excerpt from NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/17/us/projectile-problem-goes-beyond-amtrak-train-and-philadelphia.html

In 1905, a three-pound iron plumb bob hit a train carrying President Theodore Roosevelt in the stretch where Amtrak 188 apparently was hit, and “crashed through the stained-glass transom,” according to a New York Times article from the time. Railway officials at the time said stones often hit the train in the area, sometimes injuring passengers…

Karl Edler, a retired engineer who drove the line hundreds of times, said an impact could help explain the wreck. When a train pulls out of the North Philadelphia station, the engineer usually twists the throttle “up to notch eight, which is engineer-speak for wide open” he said.

It is about three miles to the curve where Amtrak 188 derailed.

“Usually you just leave the throttle open until you get up to 80 miles per hour, then put on the brake for the curve,” he said. “Seems reasonable that something happened right about that time he would have started slowing down that kept him from taking the throttle off. He was startled by the impact or whatever. And by the time he realized it, it was too late.”

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Saturday, May 16, 2015 7:13 PM

... or perhaps it was a particle beam weapon from a Chinese satelite. 

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, May 16, 2015 7:29 PM

Phoebe Vet

... or perhaps it was a particle beam weapon from a Chinese satelite. 

 

...or an indigestible bit of dinner.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • 192 posts
Posted by MrLynn on Saturday, May 16, 2015 7:38 PM

wanswheel

Excerpt from NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/17/us/projectile-problem-goes-beyond-amtrak-train-and-philadelphia.html

. . . Karl Edler, a retired engineer who drove the line hundreds of times, said an impact could help explain the wreck. When a train pulls out of the North Philadelphia station, the engineer usually twists the throttle “up to notch eight, which is engineer-speak for wide open” he said.

It is about three miles to the curve where Amtrak 188 derailed.

“Usually you just leave the throttle open until you get up to 80 miles per hour, then put on the brake for the curve,” he said. “Seems reasonable that something happened right about that time he would have started slowing down that kept him from taking the throttle off. He was startled by the impact or whatever. And by the time he realized it, it was too late.”

This is starting to look like a plausible explanation of what happened.

/Mr Lynn

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Delmarva Peninsula
  • 116 posts
Posted by SealBook27 on Sunday, May 17, 2015 9:13 AM
Euclid wrote yesterday about the possibility of memory loss. From personal experience I can tell you that this is definitely a possibility. Fifteen years ago I fell on an icy parking lot, hitting the back of my head. To this very day I still cannot remember anything except the act of sitting up with a knot on the back of my head. I spent the next half hour in a mental fog trying to figure out how and where I fell. The only way I can be sure that someone didn't come up behind me and hit me is because my wallet wasn't missing. If the engineer ducked severely enough to hit his head somewhere in the cab, he could suffer a concussion just like mine.
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, May 17, 2015 10:05 AM

Here is an apperantly a well written outline of how persons behaved right after the wreck. An interesting item was Temple University had a student emergency response group that helped as well.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/The_wreck_of_Train_No_188.html

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, May 17, 2015 10:29 AM

A number of years ago, I was sitting next to a window seat in a vehicle, and a private car drove into the side of the vehicle.  It was not at a grade crossing, but it was the kind of accident where a car does drive directly into the side of a train at a grade crossing.  The impact was just about where I was sitting, but it was not a low-floor vehicle, and the bottom of my seat was above the hood of the car.  I blacked out completely, awoke to find the side panel below the window bent inward and touching my knee which I found had no more then a redish bruise-mark but no blood.  Shatterred glass was all over the place, including on my cloths, but not on any exposed skin area, face, etc.  I think I was out for a minute or less, because the driver was just getting up, pushed open the front door, and people began filing out. I wasn't really injured, turned down the offer of an ambulance ride to a hospital for check-up, but still I had blacked out immediately on the impact.

I also recall a summer-camp incident, at a very  remote outpost we called "Phantom" reached by a hiking trail, about two miles from any road accessable by a wheeled vehicle, and long before the days of cell phones. I was 17, just between high-school and 1st year MIT.  We were sitting around a campfire, dressed in shorts, in a large very open tent.  Spagetti was cooking in a pot over the fire.  The camper who was the cook decided the spagetti was ready, and as he lifted the pot off the fire, the handle broke, and the boiling spagetti covered my bare lower legs.  The pain was so intense that I not only blacked out but my head hit the roof of the tent as a jumped up.  I did not come to until I was lying on my back on one of the canvass cots in use as a stretcher, going down the trail.  I learned the counselor with us probably saved my legs, and I did make a complete, if painful for a while, recovery, by opening the large butter jar packed in ice, using the butter to wipe off the spagetti and cool my legs at the same time.  The recovery involved about five days in the infirmary and a week on crutches.

And I still eat spagetti.  Italian food in general.  We seem to have it every third day at the Yeshiva.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, May 17, 2015 10:45 AM
SealBook27,
The news reported that the engineer did get a concussion in the wreck, but I have not heard an explanation of exactly how.   The news has also reported that the engineer had treatment for a head injury, including several stitches.
It is interesting that you mention your experience of falling on ice.  The same thing happened to me last February.  I was carrying a pan of water in front of me with both hands.  So my hands and arms were not available to break a fall.  Going down an incline, I stepped onto a broad patch of the slipperiest ice imaginable.  Both feet flew out from under me, and I remember it like slow motion.   It was so sudden that it was as if I was intentionally doing a back flip.  I landed flat on my back.  My shoulders hit first, and it was not bad.  But then my head hit at about 100 mph on the solid ice.  It was the most horrendous impact imaginable.  Next thing I knew, I was having a dream. 
In discussion with the doctor, I was told to watch for memory loss since it is a frequent symptom of a concussion.  I seem to have good memory of everything up to the head impact, and everything since, except for the time lying on the ground.  It seems like that was only a few seconds of unconsciousness, but I have no way of knowing because I was unconscious.   It could have been 15 minutes on the ground for all I know. 
In the case of the Amtrak engineer, he does not remember anything from the point of leaving the last station to the point of crawling out of the wreck.  I do not know for sure, but I would assume that if a concussion can cause memory loss of events after the concussion, post-concussion experience could also include the loss of memory of events that happened before the concussion. 
Although falling asleep could also explain a lack of memory.  Is there any way to rule out sleep as the cause of the wreck?    
  • Member since
    September 2009
  • 28 posts
Posted by FUSE- on Sunday, May 17, 2015 11:00 AM

blue streak 1

WSJ dsyd Amtrak is to immedialy install signal indications for any  reductions of 20 MPH before restarting service.  Maybe reason not starting service until Tuesday ?

This is same order that MNRR got after its wreck.  Why was Amtrak not so ordered as well ?  FRA incompetence ?

 when did Amtrac take 2nd man out of cab 

FUSE-

 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, May 17, 2015 11:01 AM

Do Amtrak electrics have deadman's control or just alerters?  I thought they had deadman's control, meaning either positive pressure on the throttle and/or foot pedal to prevent a full service application. 

If just alerters, then certainly sleep means no memory while asleep.  And instinctive reactions are possible while at sleep.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Sunday, May 17, 2015 11:21 AM

Edited post superseded by newer info.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 42 posts
Posted by dlund on Sunday, May 17, 2015 11:30 AM

Have they determined yet that he was not affected by alcohol or drugs?

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Sunday, May 17, 2015 12:07 PM
Excerpt from LA Times
So far, officials have interviewed dispatchers and listened to dispatch tapes and have “heard no communication at all from the Amtrak engineer to the dispatch center to say that something had struck his train,” Sumwalt said as he made the rounds of Sunday-morning news programs. Nor did the engineer of a nearby commuter train that was struck recall any conversation between the crew of his train and Amtrak 188, he added.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, May 17, 2015 12:30 PM

I can't speak to how Amtrak has configured their radio communications, and the recording of same.

On my carrier, whatever channel the Dispatcher logs into is recorded for the duration that the Dispatcher is logged into it.  Dispatcher consoles are configured to access the road channel and the dispatchers channel for their territories. 

Train crews must monitor the Road Channel.  When crews tone in the Dispatcher, they tone in on the Dispatcher's channel.  When the Dispatcher initiates at call to a train or other on track personnel, the call is made to the Road Channel, if the conversation will be involved the contacted party will be instructed to come to the Dispatchers channel, so a not to get walked over by all the other required communications that take place on the Road Channel.

Additionally there are designated Yard and MofW radio channels so that those communications don't get walked over on the Road channel.  The Dispatcher does not have access to these channels.

On my carrier trains are to announce observed signal indications, scheduled passenger station stops, requests to enter MofW work zones and inspections of passing trains over the road channel.  Additionally, with passenger trains the engineer will communicate the all these to the on board Conductor.  Defect Detectors announce their presence as well as a defect report for each passing train.  On a high volume, multiple track territory the radio traffic on the Road channel can become very congested.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, May 17, 2015 1:44 PM
The investigators are probably under some public pressure to tell us what happened to cause this crash.  There has already been an exceptional amount of blame being cast at high levels, such as the Mayor blaming the engineer, and all of the blaming about not maintaining the infrastructure.  I will bet that some of these blamers were stunned to suddenly see the theory advanced that vandals damaging the train with projectiles or gunfire might be to blame.
I would expect and hope that the investigation proceed with total honesty and competence, and not be cut short or compromised due to any agenda embedded in all the blaming that has gone on.  I would expect a thorough investigation that will prove or disprove this theory beyond a doubt. 
With that in mind, I am greatly surprised that Robert Sumwalt said he wants to downplay the theory that the train was struck by gunfire.  Why on earth would he publically announce anything that tends to downplay that theory before it is fully investigated by the FBI and others?  Why would he even personally jump to the conclusion that nothing struck the train?  To me, it sounds like he is downplaying this for some other reason besides the findings of the investigation, because the investigation is far from finished.      
Here is a quote:
National Transportation Safety Board member Robert Sumwalt said on CBS's "Face the Nation" program on Sunday that he wanted to "downplay" the idea that damage to the windshield might have come from someone firing a shot at the train shortly before it flew off the tracks, killing eight people and injuring more than 200 others.
"I've seen the fracture pattern; it looks like something about the size of a grapefruit, if you will, and it did not even penetrate the entire windshield," Sumwalt said.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: St. Paul, Minnesota
  • 2,116 posts
Posted by Boyd on Sunday, May 17, 2015 2:00 PM

Of course this could be more of the terrorist type activity that has been happening since 9/11. A thinking (evil) terrorist would attack us in ways we have not been attacked before or expect. 

Modeling the "Fargo Area Rapid Transit" in O scale 3 rail.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Sunday, May 17, 2015 2:56 PM

dlund

Have they determined yet that he was not affected by alcohol or drugs?

 

A urine was collected at the hospital where Mr Bostian was treated for his injuries. The tested sample was free of any evidence of drugs or alcohol. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, May 17, 2015 2:59 PM

Euclid
With that in mind, I am greatly surprised that Robert Sumwalt said he wants to downplay the theory that the train was struck by gunfire.  Why on earth would he publically announce anything that tends to downplay that theory before it is fully investigated by the FBI and others?  Why would he even personally jump to the conclusion that nothing struck the train?  To me, it sounds like he is downplaying this for some other reason besides the findings of the investigation, because the investigation is far from finished.      

Your answer from your own post is right in front of your eyes, in red, directly below:

Robert Sumwalt said on CBS's "I've seen the fracture pattern; it looks like something about the size of a grapefruit, if you will, and it did not even penetrate the entire windshield," Sumwalt said. 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, May 17, 2015 3:02 PM

Boyd

Of course this could be more of the terrorist type activity that has been happening since 9/11. A thinking (evil) terrorist would attack us in ways we have not been attacked before or expect. 

 

 
Might as well speculate that 'the  Devil devil made him do it' or some other highly improbable cause.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Sunday, May 17, 2015 3:16 PM

Mr. Sumwalt's reluctance to divulge certain details is a basic principal of investigation. If you want to catch a bad guy, don't spook him. That may be the reason he won't share at this time.

That said, I'm still (impatiently) awaiting the results from the FBI.

Norm


  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 42 posts
Posted by dlund on Sunday, May 17, 2015 3:32 PM

narig01

 

 
dlund

Have they determined yet that he was not affected by alcohol or drugs?

 

 

 

A urine was collected at the hospital where Mr Bostian was treated for his injuries. The tested sample was free of any evidence of drugs or alcohol. 

 

 

 

narig01, thank you for the response.  I had assumed that was checked immediately but I was not sure.

 

Thanks!

 

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, May 17, 2015 3:59 PM

Norm48327

Mr. Sumwalt's reluctance to divulge certain details is a basic principal of investigation. If you want to catch a bad guy, don't spook him. That may be the reason he won't share at this time.

That said, I'm still (impatiently) awaiting the results from the FBI.

Yeah, seriously, first time I heard the "wait until Monday" line from the FBI.

Whats up with that? 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, May 17, 2015 4:26 PM
Norm48327

Mr. Sumwalt's reluctance to divulge certain details is a basic principal of investigation. If you want to catch a bad guy, don't spook him. That may be the reason he won't share at this time.

 
Yes, I agree that he should not divulge details during a sensitive investigation, however, my point was that he did divulge an important detail by publically saying that he wants to downplay the theory of gunfire hitting the train.  I consider that to be very odd.  Why downplay that?  He has the FBI investigating the possibility of gunfire, and they have not yet reached a conclusion.  So why would Sumwalt go out on a limb at this point by publically speculating that gunfire was not involved?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy