Trains.com

A Sneaker

2987 views
44 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, August 20, 2004 3:21 PM
Mark....Are you saying the little "geared locomotives" had no advantage on steep grades using their built in "gear ratio" as long as they could achieve adhesion over a high drivered unit that had less mechanical advantage in it's design.....Leaving the rough track out of the equation.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, August 20, 2004 12:11 PM
....I suppose Shay engines would have been able to meet that grade requirement pretty good [years ago], but believe they were used in logging operations much of the time. Not sure adhesion was the real problem there. Just pure weight...pulling it up such a steep grade...engines can just pull so much tonnage up a certain grade......and holding that tonnage back and in control decending the same grade. I suppose the bottom line in recent years was it got to be too costly to operate up and down that grade. And of course the always present danger of tragedy.

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, August 20, 2004 11:54 AM
Well, see - that is why the forum is so interesting - kind of like one collective brain!

I will think of the questions and rely on all of you to supply the reasoning!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 20, 2004 11:32 AM
Dear Mookie,
There are a few other reasons for not using a cog railway. Firstly, all trains would have to switch locomotives, which costs money (the ultimate no-no for railroads). Also, cog railways cost more to build, and when Saluda was built, labor was cheap, so railways just ran many, short trains. The same thing happened pretty much on Cumbres (4%) and Raton (3.5%) passes.

I hope I have helped,
Daniel
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, August 20, 2004 9:07 AM
Well, Duh - I sure didn't think outside the box on that one did I!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, August 20, 2004 7:06 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

OK - silly me - I will ask - why wouldn't you use a cog system on the Saluda? Not efficient enough? Too heavy? Takes too long to move trains? I don't know - that's why I am here. Just seems like a really scary way to get from point to point to do it the "normal" way.

Mook

Maintenence issues notwithstanding - you would have to have a dedicated set of locos just for Saluda. It's not that they couldn't be used anywhere else on the system, but they'd be needed on the grade, so couldn't leave. Given enough traffic, that could be worthwhile. You'd also have to have enough spare cog-equipped locos to cover downtime for the primary set, and they would also be captive to the area near Saluda so they would be available if needed.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, August 20, 2004 6:15 AM
OK - silly me - I will ask - why wouldn't you use a cog system on the Saluda? Not efficient enough? Too heavy? Takes too long to move trains? I don't know - that's why I am here. Just seems like a really scary way to get from point to point to do it the "normal" way.

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:04 PM
oops my mistake I meant cog.
Andrew
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 19, 2004 8:14 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

Anything over 4% and you might as well use the clog system like they use in Switzerland.


Uhhh, I think you mean "cog", not clog. Oh, and we do have a few cog railways in the U.S. The Mt. Washington Railway in N.H. comes to mind...

LC
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:53 PM
Anything over 4% and you might as well use the clog system like they use in Switzerland.
Andrew
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, August 19, 2004 3:40 PM
....Now just think about Saluda and it's 4.7%......How did they ever get that much weight up that grade.....!! Yes, I know they did for years, but doesn't it make one think about railroad equipment grinding up that much grade.

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:11 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dgwicks

The previous topic where this was discussed is

"Horse shoe curve"
I went back to the topic and printed it off. Lots of info there!

Thanx

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:08 PM
Thank you - I knew someone would come through for me!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:04 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M.W. Hemphill

1 foot rise in 100 foot run = 1%
2 foot rise in 100 foot run = 2%
3.4533 foot rise in 100 foot run = 3.4533%

That's all there is to it.

4% is pretty steep if you're walking up -- you'll feel it very quickly if you're not in shape.
Take it from a guy that has done his share of surveying, You got that 4% right even if you are in pretty good shape
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:59 PM
The previous topic where this was discussed is

"Horse shoe curve"
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
A Sneaker
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:39 PM
Kind of like a quickie -

I asked this before, but then lost it in all the postings we have had lately.

Can someone tell me the forumla for how many feet for how long for a 1% grade? I was told one time, but can't find my notes on it.

Thank you.

Mz Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy