Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
why did the UP make it when so many others failed?
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
i was sitting here wondering why the Union Pacific has lasted so long when so many other railroads didnt make it. the UP was just another bridge line when it started, with not very many industries. basically all they had was grain and bridge traffic from chicago to the west coast. how did they make it? the C&NW had basically the same setup, but they ended up getting bought. the SP was the other end of the UP leg, and they had tons of on line industries in CA and TX and other places. and they didnt make it either. <br /> <br />was it the discovery of coal in Wyoming that saved the UP? was it better management? how did they not only survuve, but thrive when other bridge lines went bankrupt or were bought out?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy