Trains.com

the train used in back to the future 3

24194 views
32 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, March 18, 2004 7:01 PM
Guys,

For those interested, Rogers delivered their locomotive No 4493 to the Prescott and Arizona Central in March 1891. It is shown as being numbered "W. H. Kelly #3", had 17"x24" cylinders and 54" drive wheels.

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Milwaukee, WI
  • 79 posts
Posted by Markgro on Thursday, March 18, 2004 6:42 PM
Being a fan of the BTTF Trilogy, I've done extensive research on the trains used in BTTF III, including how and where the scenes were filmed.

The steam locomotive used for the 1885 scenes, has become a "movie star" over the decades through appearances in several movies and TV shows. It is ex-Prescott & Arizona Central Railroad Locomotive No. 3--originally built in 1891 by Rogers Locomotive Works of Patterson, New Jersey (renumbered No. 131 for BTTF III). The 4-6-0 locomotive was originally designed to run on coal, but was converted to an oil-burner in the early 1900s after being relocated to the Sierra Railway (and apparently in BTTF II, it appears to be disguised as a wood-burner) .

The locomotive is on display at Railtown 1897 State Historic Park in Jamestown, California. It is currently being restored, and has thus been disassembled for the time being. Among other equipment on display are the wooden passenger cars and caboose seen in BTTF III, as well (they were lettered for Central Pacific in the movie).

The climactic 1885 railroad sequence in BTTF III was filmed on the Sierra Railway, in the vicinity of Jamestown and Sonora, in northern California. In addition to using the full-sized steam locomotive, tender, and DeLorean for close-up and wide-angle shots, the filmmakers also used 1/4 scale models of the locomotive, tender, DeLorean, and unfinished trestle for other shots. Also interesting to note on the full-sized equipment, filmmakers feared running the steam locomotive forward could derail the DeLorean (and Michael J. Fox inside of it). To aleiviate that risk, they secured the DeLorean to the front of the locomotive, and then filmed the train running in reverse--thus the train was actually pulling the car. When all of this footage was put together for the movie, the footage of the train running in reverse was reversed to make it appear as if it was actually moving forward, pushing the DeLorean.

Jumping ahead to the 1985 scene...

The only shot using scale models in the 1985 scene is at the very beginning--the overhead view of the completed bridge (rather extravagant too, woth towers and suspension cables!), as the DeLorean bursts into 1985 (which is being pulled across with a wire). Everything in that scene after that shot was filmed on-location and in full-size.

The tracks belong to the Ventura County Railway Company, a 10-mile shortline running between Oxnard, and Port Hueneme, California (in metro Los Angeles). It is actually just a couple blocks away from the coast, where the tracks terminate at a large port facility. DeLorean rolls thorugh the railroad crossing on Ventura Road in Port Hueneme (the "Eastwood Ravine Bridge" in the background is just a false facade).

The diesel locomotives that plow into the DeLorean a few moments later, actually do belong to the Ventura County Railway (and were painted/lettered for it in the movie). They appear to be Alco S-6's. Two of them were used: Locomotive #9 was the lead engine and Locomotive #11 was coupled behind, followed by a short string of boxcars.

Also of note, the filmmakers used a beat-up DeLorean that was no longer in running condition, gutted it, decorated it with "time machine" parts, and cut the frame and body in stragegic places so when the train would hit, they would get the desired effect of the car quite literally bursting at the seams (had they not done that, the locomotive would have simply pushed the car down the tracks a ways). They also used a little bit of explosives planted beneath the car to help put the car in pieces.

The "field" in the screencap posted earlier in the thread is just beyond the crossing at Ventura Road--the crossing we see the DeLorean roll through (so it would be right "behind" the camera in that photo. So the field and the crossing are all in the same place, you're just looking at it from different angles. No visual/editing trickery there.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:54 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainheartedguy

QUOTE: Originally posted by SLIC


here is a picture (if it works)

i thought they were next to a RRxing in the movie this shows a field whats the deal is this the same train or another one

There is the field & then the crossing. the camera is probably right at the crossing for this shot


More likely is that the crossing scene was shot with a secondary unit at a city location then edited into this scene which was shot out in the country for safety, lots a room for parts to fly and if the train derailed, it would only hit brush, not property. Films are often shot completely out of order and a different locations, with many more hours of footage than they can use, thats why they give Oscars for film editing.[;)]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:36 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dave9999

QUOTE: Originally posted by wcfan4ever

What about the diesels that slammed into the DeLorean? What railroad line was used and what company's locos were used?


If a train slammed into a car on the tracks, wouldn't the train stop??? In the movie
the train just goes on about it's business as if nothing happened. And this is after it
has demolished a DeLorean. Dave


That's showbiz!
[8D]
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Anywhere there are trains
  • 578 posts
Posted by Train Guy 3 on Monday, March 15, 2004 8:19 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainheartedguy

QUOTE: Originally posted by Train Guy 3

Well as big as a BTTF fan I am i unfortunalty don't have any information on the engine's prior use. But while were on the subject of BTTF, did anyone notice there was no device used to keep the front wheels from turning left-to-right. The DeLorean would have went off the rails.


Well, auto rims would be a dual flange, and I guess they decided that would be enough to hold it on the rails. It might work.

And why would the stack explode? wouldn't the boiler be first?

Remember: Hollywood



Actually they replaced the auto rims with rail wheels.

Boiler explode? Stack explode? Hollywood cant get anything right. Once the bolts started blowing off the boiler I thought it would have all blown apart, lost steam or something.

TG3 LOOK ! LISTEN ! LIVE ! Remember the 3.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 15, 2004 7:52 PM
The Alcos in BTTF 3 are ex-SP S6's, at the time owned by the Ventura County RR. The VC has been used in a lot of T.V. productions like "CHIPS" and "The Dukes of Hazzard."

Sierra No. 3 was brought to Ca. in 1897, after being brought up from the Prescott and Arizona Central, which was built by the Sierra's builder, Thomas Bullock. He purchased the 3 and two sister engines used for the P & AC in 1887. Got these facts from the TRAINS December '97 issue. HTH[8D]
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, March 15, 2004 7:31 PM
Guys,

The diesel locomotives are definitely Alco and definitely ex Southern Pacific, possibly model S-5.

While on the subject of Alco, I checked my Rogers builder's list for 1891, but didn't find any locomotives built new for the Sierra Railroad.

Are we sure of the builder and date? I always thought Sierra 3 looked a lot like the old Clinchfield No 1, which I thought was a Baldwin.

Peter
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:40 PM
I belive the loco is a ventura county railroad swicher. I used to live by the VCRY tracks and I've seen that loco painted in more colors than I could ever count. I belive they promote the use of there railroad to the filming industry to this day.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 14, 2004 9:32 PM
Locos not Alco S-1 units...radiators in wrong location. S-1 had radiators on the sides of the unit, rather than the front. Odd headlites do seem like pure SP, though.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Sunday, March 14, 2004 9:06 PM
Okay, the car was smashed in front of people, who were at the grade crossing. But none of them noticed! Plus nobody cleaned up! This always amused me.
The steam loco that appeared at the end is at a park in Florida. I know this because I saw a picture of it in a relative`s photo album. It was labeled Locomotive of the future, obviously they didn``t realize what it really was.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,888 posts
Posted by tree68 on Sunday, March 14, 2004 8:22 PM
Uncle Joe may have said it was the CNW, but it was the Sierra.

The little known movie "Chattanooga Choo Choo (it had Joe Namath in it, among others) was supposedly set in the east, but had definite shots of the Sierra and the CA RR museum.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 14, 2004 8:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SLIC


here is a picture (if it works)

i thought they were next to a RRxing in the movie this shows a field whats the deal is this the same train or another one

There is the field & then the crossing. the camera is probably right at the crossing for this shot
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 14, 2004 4:00 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by andyjay

Those who have seen this movie know that the time-traveling DeLorean car was mounted on rail wheels and pushed to 88 MPH by a steam engine. Apparently the engine, Sierra Railroad No. 3, was built by the Rogers Works in 1891 (though the film took place in 1885), and has been at the Sierra Railroad in northern California for some time. It and that tourist line, have been used in several Western movies and TV shows over the years, including Petticoat Junction in the '60s. But before it became a movie star engine, what railroad was that engine used for? When was it retired?
the RR in Petticoat Jct was C&NW according to uncle joe who was movin kinda slow[8D]




green acres is the place to be faarrrmm livin is lifr for me
land spreadin out so far and wide keep manhatten just give me that country side[:p][:p]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 14, 2004 3:57 PM
a little while after that movie was made they talked about it on tv the loco going off the cliff was a model they said its easyier to replace than a real steam loco
you would think they were rite


but on the Tv show MONK they showed a F7 A-B-B-A set of western pacific
loco's pullin a WP passenger train also some thing wierd was the swith on the mainline was unlocked[8D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 14, 2004 3:51 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by NightCrawler

the name on the sides of the switchers is Valley Central Railway. they are ex Southern Pacific locomotives of some type, but i cant tell which kind.


maybe Alco or FM

here is a picture (if it works)

i thought they were next to a RRxing in the movie this shows a field whats the deal is this the same train or another one
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 14, 2004 3:49 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by andyjay

I've been subscribing to a Back to the Future messageboard as well, and apparently the place where the DeLorean was smashed by a diesel freight train was on a branch of the former SP in Oxnard, Ca. I know I haven't seen that livery before, at least not in this area: yellow with a blue lengthwise stripe. Maybe they just painted them that way for the movie so no real railroad would get bad publicity, not stopping after smashing into a car on the tracks and all.
In the movie the steam train was on the old Central Pacific. What year did that become part of the UP?
either late 1800's or early1900's[8D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 14, 2004 4:07 AM
Maybe there's a freight yard nearby (in the movie universe, not the real one; in real life apparently those tracks serve a nearby military base).
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:15 AM
The units look like ex-SP Alco S-1's and the Holloywood Everywhere would do that to make it look like dirt. Figures that Hollywood would use switch engines for a road freight.

I think Sierra 1 came directly to the Sierra, but am not sure. At any rate, they sure have had it a long time because I think it made Black and White movies.
Eric
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:01 AM
Actually, I thought the train not stopping after the car was smashed up was pretty reasonable. Can you imagine how much time would have been spent while the police investigated? The crew would go on hogs, the freight wouldn't get delivered, cost to the railroads in the $ Thousands... Hey, it's just a extension of the fantasy!

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 13, 2004 4:23 PM
Would the roadbed be commonly sand like that?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 13, 2004 3:46 PM
the name on the sides of the switchers is Valley Central Railway. they are ex Southern Pacific locomotives of some type, but i cant tell which kind.


maybe Alco or FM

here is a picture (if it works)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 13, 2004 11:18 AM
i'll have to fie up the dvd when i get back home and see what the lettering on the side of the switchers is. i know if you play itstep by step you can see some lettering.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 13, 2004 6:04 AM
I've been subscribing to a Back to the Future messageboard as well, and apparently the place where the DeLorean was smashed by a diesel freight train was on a branch of the former SP in Oxnard, Ca. I know I haven't seen that livery before, at least not in this area: yellow with a blue lengthwise stripe. Maybe they just painted them that way for the movie so no real railroad would get bad publicity, not stopping after smashing into a car on the tracks and all.
In the movie the steam train was on the old Central Pacific. What year did that become part of the UP?
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Along the Murphy Branch
  • 1,410 posts
Posted by dave9999 on Friday, March 12, 2004 11:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by wcfan4ever

What about the diesels that slammed into the DeLorean? What railroad line was used and what company's locos were used?


If a train slammed into a car on the tracks, wouldn't the train stop??? In the movie
the train just goes on about it's business as if nothing happened. And this is after it
has demolished a DeLorean. Dave
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Friday, March 12, 2004 2:55 PM
I don't know what the switchers were, but they had a million lights on the front.

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 12, 2004 1:52 PM
Last time I saw it I know I recognised the diesels, I don't remember though. I think it may have been lease units.
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Reedsville, WI
  • 557 posts
Posted by wcfan4ever on Friday, March 12, 2004 10:26 AM
What about the diesels that slammed into the DeLorean? What railroad line was used and what company's locos were used?

Dave Howarth Jr. Livin' On Former CNW Spur From Manitowoc To Appleton In Reedsville, WI

- Formerly From The Home of Wisconsin Central's 5,000,000th Carload

- Manitowoc Cranes, Manitowoc Ice Machines, Burger Boat

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:44 PM
huh, I never thought of that
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:28 PM
I also noticed that standard couplers were used. The year was supposed to be 1885, IIRC. I thought I remember reading that standard couplers came into use in 1889, prior to that it was link and pin.
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy