Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Are Piggyback Van Trains faster then Doublestack?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="Hugh Jampton"][quote] user="BuyCSXrailroadStock!"] <P>Greenbrier and Gunderson are making Light Wieght Aluminum Coal Cars....</P> <P>Must be a reason for this. The fuel savings on a 100 car 10,000 ton freight train?</P> <P>Also I have seen Allunimun Hoppers....So it is only a a matter of time before we have Allnimim Intermodal Flats..</P> <P>[/quote]<BR><BR>Not fuel savings. With coal for every pound you remove from the tare weight of the vehicle it allows an extra pound of coal, given that railroads are limited by the axle load.<BR>Intermodal cars don't even come close to reaching the limit, and until they rais the maximum load of a comtainer to the point where aluminum cars become necessary they'll be made of goos old cheaper steel.<BR>[/quote]</P> <P>True. The weight savings that comes from using aluminum over steel in intermodal apps is focussed on the boxes/trailers themselves, since <EM>highway</EM> weight limits do affect the cargo vs tare equation.</P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy