Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
DM&E vs Mayo: Who's side is TRAINS on anyway?

Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="TheAntiGates"][quote user="futuremodal"]   If TRAINS had truly been objective, they'd have reported the alleged errors in both polls.  Personally, I detest kalmbach's bent to err on the side of an extremely disingenuous minority. [/quote] It has grown clear to me that BOTH principals in this ordeal qualify to wear the black hat . Perhaps Kalmbach simply decided to pursue the lesser of two weasels?  [oX)] [/quote] I see.  We have yet another case of engendering moral equivilence in order to appear "fair".  Memo to AG - Mayo has no credible standing in this tiff.  The railroad preceded Mayo as a matter of apriori standing, but regardless of that, DM&E has every right to pursue expansion to garner more business, same as Mayo.  Mayo is trying an end around, using legal obfuscation to make a case for the feds to deny DM&E's loan, a case they know perfectly well they will not win in court, but one in which they hope to drag things out until DM&E's private capital dries up. I don't see DM&E using any similar tactics to try and deny Mayo it's right to free enterprise. I also don't see any medical trade mags giving the benefit of doubt to the outsider same as Kalmbach.  It begs the question - did the Kalmbach reporter even try to get a response from DM&E?  Personally, I'd think a railroad magazine would have a railroad like DM&E on speed dial.  Why did PR.com get DM&E's response to the Mayo push poll while TRAINS didn't?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag