Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Trouble in open access paradise?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P>If you'll beg my pardon, it just seems to me (and feel free to correct me if I am wrong) that you Brits made things much more complex than need be, e.g. the initial breakup of BR into 100 or so entities. Wouldn't things have been a lot more simplified if you had either reverted back to the original four integrated private rail operators e.g pre-nationalization, or (in compliance with the EU directive) at least kept the entire infrastructure under public control and just let out the train operations to private entities in true open access mode? </P> <P>[quote user="owlsroost"] The operators don't have to bid for a TAA - the TAA gives you the right to access the tracks in return for payment to Network Rail, but getting paths on a particular route is a separate (no payment) bidding process managed by Network Rail. It's overseen by the Office of Rail Regulation, to which an operator can appeal if it thinks it's not being fairly treated in the process.<BR>[/quote]</P> <P>So is the process of obtaining paths done by lottery, or does the ORR use a subjective analysis to determine who gets what?</P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy