Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Trouble in Closed Access paradise?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P>This is a clear example of why an unregulated private integrated rail network is suseptable to one internal corporate division bleeding out another for the ostensible overall benefit of the whole corporation. The easiest way to shift money around within an integrated railroad is to defer construction and maintenance of actual track, and use that money for more non-operational items, usually involving the stock price.</P> <P>Deferred maintenance has been a long standing problem with the integrated model, because it is easier to hide within the total corporate balance sheet. Separating the divisions and requiring transparancy for each division's actions is one salient check on such actions, since an infrastructure company's attempts to defer maintenance would be much tougher to get away with, e.g. where are they going to hide the transaction?</P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy