Trains.com

Terror on the Tracks

2245 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Terror on the Tracks
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 14, 2007 8:45 AM

From the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:

"Let's say the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporter really was a terrorist.

"What if those were bombs he was placing on the chemical placard of a rail car inside the Thatcher Chemical Co. plant in suburban Las Vegas, and not his business cards?

"Instead of a camera recording lax security over some of the deadliest chemicals ever produced, he held a detonator? And the string of chlorine gas cars trundling down Union Pacific Railroad tracks in the heart of Vegas was his prey?

"If he was a terrorist, and his goal was to release a potentially catastrophic cloud of deadly gases, explosives and caustic acids -- in unguarded cars, left abandoned -- then a U.S. Department of Homeland Security's planning scenario might apply: 17,500 people dead, another 10,000 suffering injuries and 100,000 more flooding trauma wards, convinced they've been poisoned. The environmental damage would take weeks to clean up, forcing the evacuation of as many as 70,000 residents from a city built on sin, military might and heavy industry."

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_487117.html

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_487120.html

Dave 

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: SE Wisconsin
  • 1,181 posts
Posted by solzrules on Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:31 AM
 dsktc wrote:

From the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:

"Let's say the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporter really was a terrorist.

"What if those were bombs he was placing on the chemical placard of a rail car inside the Thatcher Chemical Co. plant in suburban Las Vegas, and not his business cards?

"Instead of a camera recording lax security over some of the deadliest chemicals ever produced, he held a detonator? And the string of chlorine gas cars trundling down Union Pacific Railroad tracks in the heart of Vegas was his prey?

"If he was a terrorist, and his goal was to release a potentially catastrophic cloud of deadly gases, explosives and caustic acids -- in unguarded cars, left abandoned -- then a U.S. Department of Homeland Security's planning scenario might apply: 17,500 people dead, another 10,000 suffering injuries and 100,000 more flooding trauma wards, convinced they've been poisoned. The environmental damage would take weeks to clean up, forcing the evacuation of as many as 70,000 residents from a city built on sin, military might and heavy industry."

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_487117.html

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_487120.html

Dave 

And what if an individual, not knowing of the reporter's cute little fear mongering publicity stunt, retreived his shotgun and killed the guy thinking he was a terrorist?  What if, while this reporter was taking notes on yet another marvelous 'what if' scenario, someone confronted the reporter?  Would the story then be about how Americans are beholden to fear?  What was he doing in the railyard anyway?  Tresspassing in an effort to keep the public informed? 

You think this is bad? Just wait until inflation kicks in.....
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 14, 2007 10:06 AM

Shooting first and asking questions later is legal in only a few states. 

In Jan. 2004, Mr. Prine was found guilty by a PA District Court of trespassing at the Neville Island chemical plant and ordered to pay a $25 fine plus court costs. 

He was discovered trespassing while researching a story on security at the Neville Island plant.

Dave

 

 solzrules wrote:
 dsktc wrote:

From the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:

"Let's say the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporter really was a terrorist.

"What if those were bombs he was placing on the chemical placard of a rail car inside the Thatcher Chemical Co. plant in suburban Las Vegas, and not his business cards?

"Instead of a camera recording lax security over some of the deadliest chemicals ever produced, he held a detonator? And the string of chlorine gas cars trundling down Union Pacific Railroad tracks in the heart of Vegas was his prey?

"If he was a terrorist, and his goal was to release a potentially catastrophic cloud of deadly gases, explosives and caustic acids -- in unguarded cars, left abandoned -- then a U.S. Department of Homeland Security's planning scenario might apply: 17,500 people dead, another 10,000 suffering injuries and 100,000 more flooding trauma wards, convinced they've been poisoned. The environmental damage would take weeks to clean up, forcing the evacuation of as many as 70,000 residents from a city built on sin, military might and heavy industry."

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_487117.html

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_487120.html

Dave 

And what if an individual, not knowing of the reporter's cute little fear mongering publicity stunt, retreived his shotgun and killed the guy thinking he was a terrorist?  What if, while this reporter was taking notes on yet another marvelous 'what if' scenario, someone confronted the reporter?  Would the story then be about how Americans are beholden to fear?  What was he doing in the railyard anyway?  Tresspassing in an effort to keep the public informed? 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Sunday, January 14, 2007 10:24 AM
I am getting very tired of viewing these "investigative reporters" pieces supposedly developed with the public's safety in mind but (in reality) nothing more than ratings boosting and self-serving crap.  I would like to see more of these prissy jerks taken down a notch.  This is not to mention that they are giving information on where to strike to the terrorists they are supposedly protecting us from.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 14, 2007 10:30 AM

Yes, sir. The bad guys are too stupid to find our railyards, chemical and water treatment plants and surely have no understanding of high school-level chemistry.

Dave  

 eolafan wrote:
I am getting very tired of viewing these "investigative reporters" pieces supposedly developed with the public's safety in mind but (in reality) nothing more than ratings boosting and self-serving crap.  I would like to see more of these prissy jerks taken down a notch.  This is not to mention that they are giving information on where to strike to the terrorists they are supposedly protecting us from.

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: SE Wisconsin
  • 1,181 posts
Posted by solzrules on Sunday, January 14, 2007 11:39 AM
 dsktc wrote:

Yes, sir. The bad guys are too stupid to find our railyards, chemical and water treatment plants and surely have no understanding of high school-level chemistry.

Dave  

 

My point is that the second anyone confronts them about what they are doing then these literary geniuses start ranting and raving about how we are losing our 'rights' (as if we had a right to tresspass on private property at will).  I have read stories about both - one minute all of our ports are open to attack from every angle and the next minute the rights of Americans are erroding because of increased security measures. In either case, fault always seems to lie with the Bush administration and almost never with the terrorists. 

Question:  IF these terrorists pigs are so good at chemistry and the like, why haven't attacks on rail cars occured yet?  Your point is that they don't need to watch some stupid reporter to find out their next move, so why haven't they carried out the doomsday scenario that the reporter described? 

You think this is bad? Just wait until inflation kicks in.....
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 14, 2007 12:53 PM
 solzrules wrote:
 dsktc wrote:

Yes, sir. The bad guys are too stupid to find our railyards, chemical and water treatment plants and surely have no understanding of high school-level chemistry.

Dave  

 

My point is that the second anyone confronts them about what they are doing then these literary geniuses start ranting and raving about how we are losing our 'rights' (as if we had a right to tresspass on private property at will).  I have read stories about both - one minute all of our ports are open to attack from every angle and the next minute the rights of Americans are erroding because of increased security measures. In either case, fault always seems to lie with the Bush administration and almost never with the terrorists. 

Question:  IF these terrorists pigs are so good at chemistry and the like, why haven't attacks on rail cars occured yet?  Your point is that they don't need to watch some stupid reporter to find out their next move, so why haven't they carried out the doomsday scenario that the reporter described? 

Because we've been lucky and the Department of Homeland Security has been busy.  Sooner or later though, we're likely to get hit again.....

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: SE Wisconsin
  • 1,181 posts
Posted by solzrules on Sunday, January 14, 2007 12:55 PM
 Reno Sparky wrote:
 solzrules wrote:
 dsktc wrote:

Yes, sir. The bad guys are too stupid to find our railyards, chemical and water treatment plants and surely have no understanding of high school-level chemistry.

Dave  

 

My point is that the second anyone confronts them about what they are doing then these literary geniuses start ranting and raving about how we are losing our 'rights' (as if we had a right to tresspass on private property at will).  I have read stories about both - one minute all of our ports are open to attack from every angle and the next minute the rights of Americans are erroding because of increased security measures. In either case, fault always seems to lie with the Bush administration and almost never with the terrorists. 

Question:  IF these terrorists pigs are so good at chemistry and the like, why haven't attacks on rail cars occured yet?  Your point is that they don't need to watch some stupid reporter to find out their next move, so why haven't they carried out the doomsday scenario that the reporter described? 

Because we've been lucky and the Department of Homeland Security has been busy.  Sooner or later though, we're likely to get hit again.....

Now that was an honest and logical answer.

You think this is bad? Just wait until inflation kicks in.....
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Along the BNSF "East End"... :-)
  • 915 posts
Posted by TimChgo9 on Sunday, January 14, 2007 4:03 PM

And being as how the public does not "need to know" how do we know that the Department of Homeland Security has busted a plot or two to do exactly that? 

 Just because we don't hear about it, doesn't mean it hasn't happened.  And if a plot was thwarted, perhaps it wasn't publicized because the DHS didn't want to comporomise other operations... Or maybe, the terrorists aren't that creative.  Who knows any longer. 

All of that said, really all that reporter served to do was scare people, which may have been their intent.  Besides, if you ever want to do a little reconnaisance.... just open up Google Earth, and have a look see... Besides, I am sure, somewhere in a cave in Afghanistan, or in a terrorist safe house in Iraq is a Metra schedule for the Chicago area.... I would bet on that.

 

"Chairman of the Awkward Squad" "We live in an amazing, amazing world that is just wasted on the biggest generation of spoiled idiots." Flashing red lights are a warning.....heed it. " I don't give a hoot about what people have to say, I'm laughing as I'm analyzed" What if the "hokey pokey" is what it's all about?? View photos at: http://www.eyefetch.com/profile.aspx?user=timChgo9
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: heart of the Pere Marquette
  • 847 posts
Posted by J. Edgar on Sunday, January 14, 2007 4:28 PM
 solzrules wrote:
 dsktc wrote:

And what if an individual, not knowing of the reporter's cute little fear mongering publicity stunt, retreived his shotgun and killed the guy thinking he was a terrorist?  What if, while this reporter was taking notes on yet another marvelous 'what if' scenario, someone confronted the reporter?  Would the story then be about how Americans are beholden to fear?  What was he doing in the railyard anyway?  Tresspassing in an effort to keep the public informed? 

 not to quote limbaugh but.....that is fearmongering driveby media at its finest......the only thing worse is the sheeple suckin it up.......and love the rosie shot dsktcThumbs Up [tup]

i love the smell of coal smoke in the morning Photobucket
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: SE Wisconsin
  • 1,181 posts
Posted by solzrules on Sunday, January 14, 2007 8:14 PM
Thanks.  Just don't sue me..........Laugh [(-D]Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]
You think this is bad? Just wait until inflation kicks in.....
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, January 14, 2007 10:44 PM

Jerks like that reporter make it harder on those of us who have legitimate reasons to be on the grounds of some of these plants. We have a water treatment plant in Denver that has a section corner off in part of the plant with accessory points (used to verify that the section corner is where it's supposed to be) also inside the gate & fence of the plant.

Does this circle jerk of a reporter have an address.????  I feel the need to bill him for some of my delay time caused by those like him. Security at the plant is more afraid of reporters than the criminal element. Sad....

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: West end of Chicago's Famous Racetrack
  • 2,239 posts
Posted by Poppa_Zit on Sunday, January 14, 2007 10:51 PM
 mudchicken wrote:

Does this circle jerk of a reporter have an address.????  I feel the need to bill him for some of my delay time caused by those like him. Security at the plant is more afraid of reporters than the criminal element. Sad....

Those of you who'd like to share any words of appreciation with this moron can email him at:

cprine@tribweb.com

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. They are not entitled, however, to their own facts." No we can't. Charter Member J-CASS (Jaded Cynical Ascerbic Sarcastic Skeptics) Notary Sojac & Retired Foo Fighter "Where there's foo, there's fire."
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Mt. Fuji
  • 1,840 posts
Posted by Datafever on Sunday, January 14, 2007 10:55 PM
Can't the reporter still be charged with trespassing based on his own words, plus the evidence that he left behind?
"I'm sittin' in a railway station, Got a ticket for my destination..."
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: West end of Chicago's Famous Racetrack
  • 2,239 posts
Posted by Poppa_Zit on Monday, January 15, 2007 2:46 PM

Whaddaya expect? The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, for pete's sake... a mediocre paper in a great railroad town. The Post-Gazette has a ton more readers...

The guy's probably knocking down at least 18K... for writing fiction. Big Smile [:D] 

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. They are not entitled, however, to their own facts." No we can't. Charter Member J-CASS (Jaded Cynical Ascerbic Sarcastic Skeptics) Notary Sojac & Retired Foo Fighter "Where there's foo, there's fire."
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Monday, January 15, 2007 3:49 PM
 Poppa_Zit wrote:

Whaddaya expect? The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, for pete's sake... a mediocre paper in a great railroad town. The Post-Gazette has a ton more readers...

The guy's probably knocking down at least 18K... for writing fiction. Big Smile [:D] 

If that's all he's getting, maybe he should consider honest work (or a better paying line of fiction.)  OTOH, if he keeps it up and some security guard DOES shorten his life, should we consider that improving the breed?

Chuck

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Monday, January 15, 2007 4:05 PM
 J. Edgar wrote:
 solzrules wrote:
 dsktc wrote:

And what if an individual, not knowing of the reporter's cute little fear mongering publicity stunt, retreived his shotgun and killed the guy thinking he was a terrorist?  What if, while this reporter was taking notes on yet another marvelous 'what if' scenario, someone confronted the reporter?  Would the story then be about how Americans are beholden to fear?  What was he doing in the railyard anyway?  Tresspassing in an effort to keep the public informed? 

 not to quote limbaugh but.....that is fearmongering driveby media at its finest......the only thing worse is the sheeple suckin it up.......and love the rosie shot dsktcThumbs Up [tup]

Sign - Ditto [#ditto]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:18 PM

Henry Posner of Railroad Development Corp. responds
to the Trib story:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/letters/s_488820.html


Dave

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Mt. Fuji
  • 1,840 posts
Posted by Datafever on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:25 PM
He makes a good point about the inability to control the placement of a train as opposed to trucks or planes, but nevertheless, if a tank car holding a chemical that will produce highly toxic gas is exploded in the middle of a metropolitan area, the repercussions will still be quite dramatic.
"I'm sittin' in a railway station, Got a ticket for my destination..."
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:26 PM

Mark W. Hemphill, former U.S. government's senior railway adviser to the Iraqi Republic Railways, responds to the Trib. story:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/letters/s_488823.html

Dave

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:34 PM
 dsktc wrote:

Henry Posner of Railroad Development Corp. responds
to the Trib story:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/letters/s_488820.html


Dave

    To Henry Posner: "... More to the point, the rail industry moves toxic chemicals reluctantly as part of our common carrier obligation. But we do so in partnership with the chemical industry and in close cooperation with the many regulatory agencies involved, and we recognize that the alternative presents far greater risks. Imagine, if you will, toxic chemicals shifting to truck transport or the shutdown of our water treatment systems as result of a complete ban on the movement of chlorine.

As for the revelation by the Trib's series that business cards can be left behind hazardous-materials placards on tank cars, my colleagues have so far convinced me not to take my own dramatic steps, such as leaving a backpack in a shopping mall, a paper bag in a movie theater or an envelope in the so-far-unguarded Pittsburgh Trib offices, in each case containing nothing but my own business card. "

                                      Henry Posner III
                                        Green Tree

           Nice Retort!  It is a shame, that dunderheads such as this particular reporter, are not able to wrap their minds around the fact that if the Terrorists win; they will be on the Terrorist's short list to be sent on to interview Saddam H .  

                          

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: CLARKSVILLE, TN
  • 96 posts
Posted by jp2153 on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 1:07 PM

This morning as I was drinking my cup of coffee and learning my Seaboard Signals for my upcoming class, I came upon this news story about "HAZMAT DEBATE" here in Nashville. What ever happened to GOOD REPORTING? It seems that none of the reporters know how to be part of the solution rather than be part of the problem.

Maybe, they should think about how INDUSTRY, GOVERNMENT, and the PUBLIC can discuss how to better track and secure HAZMAT. We have this new monster in the Government called "HOMELAND SECURITY". States have received some funding to upgrade their call centers. Some of the states have done well where as others have not done so well.

I say that these new Disaster Centers be notified of what is coming and going out of their jurisdictions that travels on Rail that is a potential hazard. In theory, the carrier could send a manifest prior to the load leaving to the Disaster Center and in theory they will be able to respond quickly. The response up there in Kentucky was pretty good from what I saw on FOX News.

Here is the link: http://www.newschannel5.com/global/story.asp?s=5947195

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy