Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Locomotive lashup restrictions imposed after unknown incident
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
I don't know much about current locomotives, but back in the day, the engine speed was controlled by a governor. The governor had four solenoids that were energized in various combinations by the amount of voltage applied to that circuit. Starting with 74 volts maximum, as you began to string together more and more units with MU jumpers of various condition between them, you started to get voltage drop. After 8 or 9 units there was a good chance that you wouldn't get enough voltage to the trailing units to get the engine up to the desired speed. <br /> <br />As for anyone who objects to the term "lash-up", they need a little more misery in their lives to give themselves something real to be concerned about. Yeah, I've never heard the term used on the four railroads I spent 36 years working for, but the book of rules always defined it as a "locomotive", regardless of how many units it was made up of, yet whenever you reported a train move or dispatched power from the pad, most people called it a "consist". No matter which term you use, I think we all know what you're talking about.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy