Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
53' x 102" Domestic Container thoughts.
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Well, since we are talking about domestic containers only those operating in North America would be affected. Additionally, there is a way to transition outlined above without requiring all or even most equipment to be outfitted with revised stacking posts as the container itself can fit on any ISO stacking post container when it is top stacked. Yes, the sliding tandem rail and wheels would need to be supplied but up to three of these could be repositioned in a container which is a positive advantage over the current chassis. <br /> My point is that there is a move away from the standard ISO stacking points already afoot. What I don't understand is why a more logical move was not made. Unfortunately or fortunately, I do not work for any of the container groups I am just a practicing Structural Engineer. <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy