Trains.com

Civil War Steam Question

1931 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Columbus, Ohio
  • 426 posts
Civil War Steam Question
Posted by nitroboy on Friday, October 27, 2006 9:00 PM
Does anyone know what type, length and width of wood was used for engines such as the General
and others during the Civil War?

Thanks!!!
Dave Check out my web page www.dmmrailroad.com TCA # 03-55763 & OTTS Member Donate to the Mid-Ohio Marine Foundation at www.momf.org Factory Trained Lionel Service Technician
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 27, 2006 9:09 PM

I would suspect that hard woods, i.e., oaks and maples,

would have been preferred over soft woods such as pine.

 

Dave

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: West end of Chicago's Famous Racetrack
  • 2,239 posts
Posted by Poppa_Zit on Friday, October 27, 2006 9:24 PM

 nitroboy wrote:
Does anyone know what type, length and width of wood was used for engines such as the General
and others during the Civil War?

Thanks!!!

From what I've read, railroads burning wood for fuel in those days used whatever type wood was available, based on the locale. That's not hard to figure out.

That said, if there was a choice, railroads opted for hardwoods like white oak or red oak or maple because those woods burn more evenly, cleaner, last longer and give off more heat. That is the "ideal" scenario.

On the other hand, railroads tried to stay away coniferous trees like pines. While pine wood contains turpentine, making it a quick burner, it gave off less heat per pound plus burning pine in a locomotive coated everything inside the firebox, flues, smokebox and stack with thick layers of sticky, tar-like creosote -- which not only could catch fire and burn, but acted like an insulator inside the flue pipes. You could also go three times as far with a tender filled with oak or maple than you could with pine. But if pine was all that was available, they made do.

There was no standard size -- logs were usually cut in two-foot lengths and quartered so more wood would be exposed to the fire in the firebox. Plus that size made it easier for the fireman to load. It also helped the wood dry out more quickly in the storage sheds, a very important step -- green (freshly-cut) wood will not burn well at all, and less heat means less steam. Especially in the days before superheaters and massive fireboxes, etc. Those 4-4-0s weren't as technologically advanced as steamers built during the 1940s.

But far better and much more preferable was coal after it was discovered in Pennsylvania.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. They are not entitled, however, to their own facts." No we can't. Charter Member J-CASS (Jaded Cynical Ascerbic Sarcastic Skeptics) Notary Sojac & Retired Foo Fighter "Where there's foo, there's fire."
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 32.8
  • 769 posts
Posted by Kevin C. Smith on Saturday, October 28, 2006 5:47 AM
I can't recall which but there was an African country that, in the days of steam, fired their Garrets with eucalyptus wood from company owned forests. It is a resinous wood which, as a result, burns (as one author put it) "like guncotton". Apparantly two firemen were sometimes needed to feed it into the firebox as fast as it burned. I think these were meter (or thereabouts) gauge locomotives but still...
"Look at those high cars roll-finest sight in the world."
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Saturday, October 28, 2006 9:00 AM
I would suspect that each railroad had there own specifications based on wood type and weight as well as the size of the firebox door.  There is an excellent book called Mr. Lincoln's railroads all about civil war railroading if you can find one.  You could probably scale the size of wood from a picture of an engine.  Usually they included crew members in nearly every picture.  Most people were far shorter then.  I would guess the average height to be about 5'6" to 5' 8" as a reference for measuring the wood.  I've seen pictures of stacked wood at water stops to replenish engines.  It was all uniform length and stacked more neatly than you will find products in a supermarket or at Walmart.  Labor was cheap back then.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Saturday, October 28, 2006 9:48 AM

The firebox on the Jupiter replica of an 1868 locomotive that the National Park Service operates at Golden Spike NHS is about 3 foot wide by 5 foot long.  Most of the wood we use is cut in 4 foot lengths split at least in half.  I think that 4 foot lengths would be more common than 2 foot lengths as wood was purchased by the cord, which is 4 x 4 x 8 ft.  4 foot lengths are not at all difficult to fire and get more wood into the firebox with each stick than 2 foot lengths.   In the Civil War period, wood would have been axe cut to length and 4 foot lengths require half the labor of 2 footers.

We have found the wood placement in the firebox is as important in generating steam as is the quality of wood.  We place most of the the wood length wise (parallel to the rails) and then try to find some shorter lengths to place cross wise across the back just under the fire door.  We try for a uniform layer that covers the grate.  Any uncovered grate (like that hidden spot under the fire door) allows the fire to suck cold air in to the flues and that can cost you 10 pounds of steam in just a few minutes.

Currrently we are firing with lodgepole pine cut from maintenance operations at Yellowstone Park, but we have also fired with cedar (burns really hot) and cottonwood (not much different from pine).  Contrary to popular belief, we have found that if you are running a hot enough fire to generate 150 psi, resin buildup from pine is almost negligable.  We have more trouble with buildup in the coal-fired UP119 .  Even so, both engines get the boiler flues cleaned out once a month during boiler wash - and that is a dirty job.

Since wood is a bulky fuel, it would not be transported any further than needed - so Civil War wood burners would have burned anything that was available locally.

dd

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • 400 posts
Posted by martin.knoepfel on Saturday, October 28, 2006 3:34 PM
@ Kevin Smith.

The African country you mention is Angola, former (till 1975) Portugiese territory. The railroad is the Benguela Railroad that ran from the ports of Lobito and Benguela to the boarder. It was important for the export of ore from Katanga and Zambia. AFAIK, it is still out of service due to the - now ended- civil war that broke out after 1975. It ran on cape-gauge (1067 mm). In Portugiese days, there was a continuos rail-link from the Atlantic (Lobito) to the Indian Ocean, i.e. across Africa, but I don't know whether there has ever been a through train.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Columbus, Ohio
  • 426 posts
Posted by nitroboy on Sunday, October 29, 2006 10:03 AM
Thanks for all the help!!! Do you happen to know how much a tender could hold?

Thanks again
Dave Check out my web page www.dmmrailroad.com TCA # 03-55763 & OTTS Member Donate to the Mid-Ohio Marine Foundation at www.momf.org Factory Trained Lionel Service Technician
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 29, 2006 3:53 PM

The General is still on display at the Locomotive Museum of the Civil War in Kennesaw, Georgia.  They have the archives of the Southern Railways Historical Society there as well.  They can answer your questions and would be more than happy to do so.

Hardwoods might have been used, but the predominant fuel used by the General was pine.  Pine trees were plentiful (and still are) in that part of Georgia.  As near as I can tell, the capacity of the General's tender was about a cord of wood.  Each log was probably about two feet long.  The firebox door is not big.  The tender was loaded by hand, which made wooding up a job for a couple of people and took a while to do. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,010 posts
Posted by tree68 on Sunday, October 29, 2006 6:09 PM

And just for reference - a full cord is 4x4x8 feet.

The wood people buy nowadays for their woodstoves and fireplaces is usually sold by the face cord - 4x8x the length of the cut (usually 16-18", but varies).

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Monday, October 30, 2006 9:29 AM

 nitroboy wrote:
Thanks for all the help!!! Do you happen to know how much a tender could hold?

Thanks again

The Jupiter holds at least a cord of wood.  With careful stacking you can get another 1/2 cord piled above the side boards and over the water tank.  Some contemporary photos show wood stacked almost as high as the cab roof.

dd

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Mt. Fuji
  • 1,840 posts
Posted by Datafever on Monday, October 30, 2006 9:34 AM
A related question:
How far would a cord of wood (or a full tender) take such a train?

"I'm sittin' in a railway station, Got a ticket for my destination..."
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Monday, October 30, 2006 10:24 AM

 Datafever wrote:
A related question:
How far would a cord of wood (or a full tender) take such a train?

The standard answer to that question at the Golden Spike NHS is 20 to 30 miles, depending on train size, terrain, and wood quality. 

dd

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Columbus, Ohio
  • 426 posts
Posted by nitroboy on Monday, October 30, 2006 7:13 PM
While I was visiting the B&O Museum, they had a B&ORR train there, but no one could answer my questions on the wood. The staff informed me the the wood on the tender was just put up there for show. There were some big pieces that looked like there was no way they would fit in the firebox.


Dave Check out my web page www.dmmrailroad.com TCA # 03-55763 & OTTS Member Donate to the Mid-Ohio Marine Foundation at www.momf.org Factory Trained Lionel Service Technician
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 30, 2006 8:51 PM

 nitroboy wrote:
While I was visiting the B&O Museum, they had a B&ORR train there, but no one could answer my questions on the wood. The staff informed me the the wood on the tender was just put up there for show. There were some big pieces that looked like there was no way they would fit in the firebox.


Is this the William Mason that was test run recently?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5CO4UoU3DE

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:09 AM

 nitroboy wrote:
While I was visiting the B&O Museum, they had a B&ORR train there, but no one could answer my questions on the wood. The staff informed me the the wood on the tender was just put up there for show. There were some big pieces that looked like there was no way they would fit in the firebox.


Over that last 6 mongths I have been learning to fire a wood fired steam locomotive.  Generally, the wood is stacked, not just thrown in - because you can get more wood in the tender by stacking.  Stacked wood also makes it easier for the fireman to select a log.  I like to have a selection of diameters to keep the fire as uniform as possible.  See we leave our locomotive for an hour or so while on display, I like some large logs (we call them lunch logs) to hold fire without constant tending.  Most of our logs are 4 foot, which works very well in a 5 foot firebox.

dd

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy