Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
UP thru Spokane
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
The Reno Trench cost roughly $282 million for 2.2 miles of project, or $128 million per mile. <br /> <br />I would venture that 1 mile of rebuilt track from Napa Junction to Hamilton Street, plus a 3 mile tunnel through basalt, plus a 4,000' viaduct over Latah Creek, plus the cost of re-aquiring the old UP/Milwaukee ROW from Fish Lake Junction to the west end of the new viaduct, plus relaying ballast and track, AND the cost of an underpass under the BNSF crossover near Scribner, would cost less per mile than the cost per mile of the Reno Trench AND cost less per mile than a southern bypass via the old PCE grade and the UP Plummer branch. <br /> <br />Basalt is easier (read - less costly) to tunnel through than granite and more stable than sandstone or clay. I will have to check this, but one website I perused stated that the BN project west of Spokane over Latah Creek plus the reroute of the ex-GN main cost $16 million in the early 1970's, so that's what? Maybe $50 million today adjusted for inflation? The total mileage of that project was about 8 miles give or take. This prospective UP project would be about 12 miles total from Fish Lake to Napa Junction.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy