Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
ATA now supports longer and/or heavier trucks
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Dave, unfortunately, is mixing apples and oranges <br />when he compares Canada's transportation system <br />to ours. Canada's population is less than 11% <br />of the United States. <br /> <br />http://www.statcan.ca/english/edu/clock/population.htm <br /> <br />http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html <br /> <br />Its GDP is less than 1/11the size of the United States. <br /> <br />http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2001rank.html <br /> <br />We have 4,180,053 km of paved roads versus Canada's <br />493,080 km. <br /> <br />http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/us.html <br /> <br />http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ca.html <br /> <br />He ignores the physics of larger and heavier trucks <br />and the danger they pose to occupants of passenger <br />vehicles. <br /> <br />http://safety.transportation.org/doc/1p%20heavy%20trucks.pdf <br /> <br />As well as the driver psychology of motorists dealing with <br />ultra-heavy trucks. <br /> <br />He is correct that ultra-heavy trucks would reduce <br />the total number of trucks on the nation's highways, <br />but does not acknowledge the negative impact on our <br />highway bridges and overpasses <br /> <br />http://www.dot.state.fl.us/research-center/Completed_Proj/Summary_STR/FDOT_379.pdf <br /> <br />He offers a faith-based assertion that longer and <br />heavier trucks will aid American manufacturers <br />and bring more efficiency to the American economy, <br />which they may, but at what cost? <br /> <br />He postulates that we should allow ultra-heavy <br />trucks to approach their "natural weight and length limits" <br />without citing where in nature he found these data. <br />(Is a 200k GVW load and quadruple trailers un-natural?) <br /> <br />He doesn't offer a single fact supporting his argument <br />that "transportation policies favor imports over domestic <br />production." We didn't lose our consumer electronics <br />industry because of transportation policies, nor our <br />textile industry for that matter. <br /> <br />Should we worry about the trade deficit and our <br />anemic rate of savings? Absolutely, but if Honda <br />can produce a better car in this country than Ford, <br />I'm going to buy the Honda. <br /> <br />http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-id.trend19mar19,0,167898.story?coll=bal-business-headlines <br /> <br />http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2005/20050414/default.htm <br /> <br />Just keep those ultra-heavy trucks off the highways. <br /> <br />Dave <br /> <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy