Trains.com

The top 10 railroad cities in the U.S.?

18354 views
53 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 1:18 PM
Might as well jump in on this.

My favorite place to watch trains is Flagstaff, Az.

ed
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 459 posts
Posted by jclass on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 2:17 PM

What about the Twin Cities?  There were rail lines all over the place.

Way back when - Buffalo?

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 432 posts
Posted by Ishmael on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 2:19 PM

Sorry to say, I agree with Oltmannd about St. Louis. My old home town used to be the most interesting to be found anywhere, excepting Chicago and Kansas City.

Many of our old lines and branches are now hiking trails, and even a drive down the river reveals more abandoned lines. West Alton used to be very active but the flood of 1993 finished it off. I could go on and on. We do get all six of the present major railroads, UP, BNSF, CSX, NS, CN and KCS but mostly runthrough, not much switching.

But let me say in defense of East St. Louis, it's not very dangerous. Not much is left over there but vacant lots. I go there from time to time, but I know my way around.

Baltimore and Ohio-America's First Railroad
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 5:00 PM

OK, Buffalo is not what it was, we only lead the way in raising taxes! Before CSX kills it we still have lots of trains on the old NYC. But, that could be over at the least provocation, something the NYSSR is far too good at for my comfort! So...

10. Milwaukee, WI (I am NOT kissing up!!)Blush [:I]OK, Atlanta.

9. San Bernadino,CA

8. Bill, WY!

7. Selkirk NYSSR

6.Orbisonia,PA

5. Durango, CO.

4. Altoona, PA

3.Cleveland OH

2. Ft. Worth-Dallas Metroplex!

1. (drumroll, please) Binghamton, NYSSR (if you read a certain regional rail newsmag!Black Eye [B)]Clown [:o)]Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]Dunce [D)])

  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Reedsville, WI
  • 557 posts
Posted by wcfan4ever on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 5:33 PM

1.   Porter, IN                     NS/Amtrak--BNSF/CP/CN/CSX/IC/GTW/NS/SP/UP/WC Power

2.   Rochelle, IL                  UP/BNSF  --BNSF/CP/CN/CSX/NS/SP/UP Power

3.   Twin Cities, MN            BNSF/CP/CN/SOO/UP Power

4.   Kansas City, MO           Everyone's Power

5.   Boone, IA                      Mostly UP Power

6.   Chicago, IL                    Everyone's Power

7.   North Fond du Lac, WI  CN            --BNSF/CN/IC/GTW/NS/UP/WC Power

8.   Ames, IA                        Mostly UP Power

9.   Wellsboro, IN                 CN/CSX   --BNSF/CP/CN/CSX/IC/GTW/NS/SP/UP/WC Power

10.   Gibbon, NE                  UP             --CN/CSX/NS/SP/UP Power

There, I went my personall railfanning favorite locations!  I also belive that Porter/Chesterton, IN has the best variety of different railroads locomotives running on NS's tracks.  One summer I caught 75% power from everyone but NS!

Dave Howarth Jr. Livin' On Former CNW Spur From Manitowoc To Appleton In Reedsville, WI

- Formerly From The Home of Wisconsin Central's 5,000,000th Carload

- Manitowoc Cranes, Manitowoc Ice Machines, Burger Boat

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 5:52 PM

1.Chicago

2.New York/Northern New Jersey area

3.Kansas City

4.Fort Worth/Dallas

5.Los Angeles

6.Portland OR. for variety and scenery

7.St. Louis

8.Philadelphia

9.Minneapolis/St.Paul

10.Vancouver,B.C.( I know this is Canada, but it is a great train watching city.)

Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 339 posts
Posted by Jack_S on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:40 PM
 Murphy Siding wrote:

      I know that Chicago has always been considered the #1 railroad city, for obvious reasons.  My city *might* rank around 983.  What would you say is the top 10, as far as railroad cities in our country?  My guess would put Kansas as #2.  Beyond that, it gets a little hazy, perhaps St. Louis,Memphis, Los Angelos,Omaha, and Houston?  What do you think?

      Are there any cities that would have been in the top 10 list 100 years, that wouldn't be today?  Milwaukee, perhaps?

Chicago has got to be at the top of any list.  3 years ago, looking down from the Sears Tower it was obvious the place is a rail yard with stations around which a city is laid out.

I will, however vote for Fullerton, CA as the most comfortable and convenient place that I know of to watch a variety of trains.  Easy access by rail or road, lots of good places to get a bite to eat, nearby hotels, a restored 1930s vintage station still in use, and, on weekdays, about 90 to 100 trains, and a sizable group of congenial local railfans.  Commuter, CA Amtrak, long distance Amtrak, and lot of long heavy freights.

jack

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 339 posts
Posted by Jack_S on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:48 PM
 Murphy Siding wrote:

      I know that Chicago has always been considered the #1 railroad city, for obvious reasons.  My city *might* rank around 983.  What would you say is the top 10, as far as railroad cities in our country?  My guess would put Kansas as #2.  Beyond that, it gets a little hazy, perhaps St. Louis,Memphis, Los Angelos,Omaha, and Houston?  What do you think?

      Are there any cities that would have been in the top 10 list 100 years, that wouldn't be today?  Milwaukee, perhaps?

Chicago has got to be at the top of any list.  3 years ago, looking down from the Sears Tower it was obvious the place is a rail yard with stations around which a city is laid out.

I will, however vote for Fullerton, CA as the most comfortable and convenient place that I know of to watch a variety of trains.  Easy access by rail or road, lots of good places to get a bite to eat, nearby hotels, a restored 1930s vintage station still in use, and, on weekdays, about 90 to 100 trains, and a sizable group of congenial local railfans.  Commuter, CA Amtrak, long distance Amtrak, and lot of long heavy freights.

jack

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Nebraska
  • 253 posts
Posted by PigFarmer1 on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:52 AM
North Platte.  Incredible volume of trains AND approximately 10% of the city's population is employed by UP.  Any way one looks at it N. Platte is a railroad town.
MoW employee
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:38 AM
I stopped in at North Platte in 1978 and was blown away.  At breakfast at the Hump Cafe, right by the yard.  It is probably gone by now.

Chicago has such an amazing diverse amount of railroading...elevated and subways (I am not a fan of either), Metra trains, Amtrak, the major class 1's, yards, junctions, towers (!), shortlines, industrials, steelmill operations(Indiana), the southside port operation...etc.etc etc.

BRC, IHB, and EJE are great terminal/switching railroads and the South Shore adds an electric element.

I missed it during the 60's and didnt spend nearly as much time as I should have during the 70's, but I appreciate it today.

ed

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 803 posts
Posted by GP40-2 on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 6:43 PM

For those of you that have written off Pittsburgh as a major transportation center, consider these stats from the U.S. Department of Transportation:

CSX, NS, and river traffic amounted to over 275 million tons of cargo orginating in, or passing through the Port of Pittsburgh in 2004.

CSX and NS rail traffic alone amounted to over 220 million tons in Pittsburgh for 2004.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 6:54 PM
 GP40-2 wrote:

For those of you that have written off Pittsburgh as a major transportation center, consider these stats from the U.S. Department of Transportation:

CSX, NS, and river traffic amounted to over 275 million tons of cargo orginating in, or passing through the Port of Pittsburgh in 2004.

CSX and NS rail traffic alone amounted to over 220 million tons in Pittsburgh for 2004.

     Interesting.  How does that compare to say, 50 years ago?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:18 PM
In 1995 I spent a day in Pittsburgh riding the light rail and general railfanning. I rode a one hour river cruise an saw over 8 trains in that one hour!
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 803 posts
Posted by GP40-2 on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:40 PM
 Murphy Siding wrote:
 GP40-2 wrote:

For those of you that have written off Pittsburgh as a major transportation center, consider these stats from the U.S. Department of Transportation:

CSX, NS, and river traffic amounted to over 275 million tons of cargo orginating in, or passing through the Port of Pittsburgh in 2004.

CSX and NS rail traffic alone amounted to over 220 million tons in Pittsburgh for 2004.

     Interesting.  How does that compare to say, 50 years ago?



There is more freight traffic going through Pittsburgh now than any point in history. The Port Authority predicts both rail and river tonnage to steadily increase.
  • Member since
    July 2014
  • 92 posts
Posted by MLG4812 on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 5:38 PM

My top 10 (including some I have personally fanned.)

 

1.) Flagstaff, AZ

2.) Galitzin, PA

3.) Gibbon, NE

4.) Marion, OH

5.) Folkston, GA

6.) Kenova, WV

7.) Erie, PA

8.) Tucson, AZ

9.) Harve De Grace, MD

10.) Porter, IN

 

The larger cities are shoe-ins. Most of the time, when you combine industry, population, and proximity to water...you're going to have a great transportation center. JMOBig Smile [:D]

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 110 posts
Posted by kevikens on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:02 PM
If by top ten you means cities for railfanning for me it's a tie between Phila. on the East Coast and the Bay Area out west. Philly has Conrail, NS, CSX, CP, SEPTA NJ Transit and a trolley line using PCC's. The Bay area, PCC's, BNSF, UP, Caltrain, Muni. Two great places to enjoy railroading.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:32 PM

Well, here's the top ten Pacific Northwest railroad cities based on my observations of dependable, varietable train watching without the hassles of urban congestion or overt foliage:

Cheney WA

Sandpoint ID

Bonners Ferry ID

The Dalles OR

Kelso WA

Klamath Falls OR

Boardman OR

Athol ID

Wallula WA

Centralia WA

Of these, maybe Sandpoint might make a US top ten.

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 8:49 PM
        Overt foliage?Laugh [(-D]  Out here, I guess we'd have to deal with aggresive corn, and over-bearing beansWink [;)]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 8:52 PM
That's as opposed to covert foliage, such as kudzu that will cover you up while you're waiting for a train.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: between the chicago main line&the west shore line
  • 835 posts
Posted by cr6479 on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:58 PM

Ahhhhh. Don't forget Rochester NY. Rochester had alot of trains back in the day here are the railroads that were here:

1) PRR

2) PENN CENTRAL

3) NEW YORK CENTRAL

4) ERIE LACKAWANA

5) LHV

6) CONRAIL

7) Avon Livonia Lakeville

8) Livonia Avon Lakeville

9) Rochester Southern

10) Rochester Genesee Valley railroad

the present

1) CSX

2) Livonia Avon Lakeville

3) Rochester Southern

4) NORFOLK SOUTHERN

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Sacramento, California
  • 420 posts
Posted by SactoGuy188 on Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:45 AM

I think the Sacramento, CA area has to be up there due to the fact the historically, Sacramento was the old terminus of the original Transcontinental Railroad and Western Pacific had its service shops in the Sacramento, CA. Sacramento was also home to the Sacramento Locomotive Works, where many Southern Pacific diesel electric locomotives underwent the General Rehabilitation and Improvement Program (GRIP) rebuilds.

Today, Sacramento is the crossroads between the east-west Overland Route and the north-south "I-5" route. Just east of Sacramento is Roseville Yard, the largest UP railyard on the US West Coast.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 20, 2006 7:03 PM

 Murphy Siding wrote:
        Overt foliage?Laugh [(-D]  Out here, I guess we'd have to deal with aggresive corn, and over-bearing beansWink [;)]

Ooooops!  Forgot how creative wordplay can cause confusion for some folks on this forum!Wink [;)]

But you know what I mean - we all like some foliage to enhance the train watching experience, but when you can't even see the tracks 20 feet away for the trees.....Blindfold [X-)]......Sad [:(]

 

That's why train watching in Eastern Washington is sooooo much better than trying to trainspot in Western Washington, you know, with all the d*** trees in the way!

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • 1,432 posts
Posted by Limitedclear on Thursday, September 21, 2006 8:18 AM

LAX is an airport...

Southern California might be worth including if you throw in the ports, Alameda Corridor and Inland Empire inland port facilities.

LC

 spbed wrote:

LAX has to be right up there

 

 Murphy Siding wrote:

      I know that Chicago has always been considered the #1 railroad city, for obvious reasons.  My city *might* rank around 983.  What would you say is the top 10, as far as railroad cities in our country?  My guess would put Kansas as #2.  Beyond that, it gets a little hazy, perhaps St. Louis,Memphis, Los Angelos,Omaha, and Houston?  What do you think?

      Are there any cities that would have been in the top 10 list 100 years, that wouldn't be today?  Milwaukee, perhaps?

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 1,092 posts
Posted by oskar on Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:48 PM

Here's my Top 10. These are based on MY OPINONS!

10. Hamlet,NC-CSX

9. Salisbury,NC-NS,NCTM (actually NCTM is in Spencer, outside of Salisbury)

8. Marion,OH-CSX, NS

7. Flostoria,OH-CSX, NS

6. Chattanooga,TN-CSX, NS

5. North Platte,NE- UP

4. ATL

3. Chicago,IL about everything.

2. Rochelle,IL - UP, BNSF

1. The Folkston Funnel in Folkston,GA - CSX

 

Honorable Mention

Saluda,NC-NS home of the Saluda Grade.

 

 

kevin

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy