Trains.com

Dynamic Braking and Steam Engines

1629 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Omaha, Nebraska
  • 1,920 posts
Dynamic Braking and Steam Engines
Posted by Willy2 on Thursday, September 7, 2006 3:20 PM

When I watch Pentrex videos they say that they need diesel helpers on the trains primarily for dynamic braking, although somtimes for extra power. What did they do in the old days when they couldn't just stick a diesel on the steam trains? Just wondering.

Willy

Willy

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Thursday, September 7, 2006 3:27 PM
I'm no expert but I believe they had to stop and set the retainer valves on the brake cylinders before decending the bigger hills. You would set a certain percentage of them not all of them.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, September 7, 2006 3:36 PM

....Yes....for hills such as Saluda down in North Carolina retainers would be set {even with diesels w/dynamics}, before decending that massive grade....But for most hills I imagine they simply relied on air brakes using the normal controls to do the retarding....

I always wondered why compression couldn't have been used in steam cylinders {of the engine}, for baking effort....by valve action...etc...

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • 400 posts
Posted by martin.knoepfel on Thursday, September 7, 2006 3:42 PM
Sort of dynamic breaking existed with some steam-engines. It was called counter-pressure-breaking.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, September 7, 2006 3:43 PM
They used to set retainers on the C&O at Alleghany (yes, I spelled that correctly), Virginia, for the eastbound descent with loaded coal trains.  Not a significant grade by Saluda standards, but definitely an obstacle.  That's probably why there were four tracks at the summit and two nearly everywhere else on the line (of course, it's been cut back to a single track in many places now).  The brakemen would have poles with which they could reach up and set the retainers from ground level, thereby saving a bit of time (keep in mind that these were gons and hoppers, not box cars).

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,012 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, September 7, 2006 3:54 PM

 martin.knoepfel wrote:
Sort of dynamic breaking existed with some steam-engines. It was called counter-pressure-breaking.

I don't remember the topic, but I think we discussed the counter-pressure braking thing a while back.  There apparently were issues with it having to do with cylinder lubrication... 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, September 7, 2006 3:58 PM

....I've seen it discussed on here several times...that is the act of "setting retainers" and I still wonder why it is necessary to trump the normal action of the brakes by mechanically setting them.

Don't quite understand what is deficient with normal air controls that the mechanical action is required in extreme cases....{steep hills}....?

Believe it is something in the process of using up the air supply somehow....??

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Thursday, September 7, 2006 4:17 PM
 Modelcar wrote:

 

I always wondered why compression couldn't have been used ade....But for most hills I imagine they simply relied on in steam cylinders {of the engine}, for baking effort....by valve action...etc...

Well what about dissipateing all that heat. If you turn the cylinders in to giant compressors that's got to produce huge amounts of heat. I suppose you could do it to for short periods of time to controll slack action but for sustained use on a long or steep grade doesn't seem feesable without a serious cooling aperatus. I don't know for sure that's just my take on it.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,012 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, September 7, 2006 5:16 PM
 Modelcar wrote:

....I've seen it discussed on here several times...that is the act of "setting retainers" and I still wonder why it is necessary to trump the normal action of the brakes by mechanically setting them.

Don't quite understand what is deficient with normal air controls that the mechanical action is required in extreme cases....{steep hills}....?

Believe it is something in the process of using up the air supply somehow....??

Bingo - In order to apply the brakes you reduce the pressure in the train line, which is also where the reservoirs on the cars get their pressure.  When all is equal, the pressure in the reservoirs is the same as the train line.  The reduction on the brake pipe signals the triple valve (brake valve on the cars) to release pressure from the reservoir to the brake cylinders.  If you do a 10 pound set (from 90 to 80 on the train line) you end up with less pressure in the reservoirs for the next application - the reservoirs can't recharge any higher than 80 lbs.  If you do too many sets and releases without allowing the reservoirs to recharge, you have no brakes.

Setting up the retainers applies some brakes on the cars without losing your air reserve. 

There's more to it, but this might help you understand somewhat.

Brakes as I understand them (and I'm working hard on that).

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Turner Junction
  • 3,076 posts
Posted by CopCarSS on Thursday, September 7, 2006 5:19 PM
I asked about using the cylinders for braking once on the Georgetown Loop. The answer I received from them said something to the effect that it can be done, but it takes a really gentle touch on the Reverser and the Throttle to avoid slipping wheels (which would provide virtually no braking, along with being hard on equipment).

-Chris
West Chicago, IL
Christopher May Fine Art Photography

"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Thursday, September 7, 2006 6:02 PM

 CopCarSS wrote:
I asked about using the cylinders for braking once on the Georgetown Loop. The answer I received from them said something to the effect that it can be done, but it takes a really gentle touch on the Reverser and the Throttle to avoid slipping wheels (which would provide virtually no braking, along with being hard on equipment).

I have seen it done once.  Very hard on the equipment - but the alternative was going to be much harder on the equipment.  Before moving again we had to visually inspect the rods and valve linkages to make sure nothing was damaged.  It also knocked loose enough crud in the bottom of the boiler that we had to manual clear the cylinder cocks and that with a boiler with only 10 days of use since the last boiler wash.  Definately not a replacement for dynamic braking.

dd

 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Omaha, Nebraska
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by Willy2 on Thursday, September 7, 2006 9:12 PM

It's a little more complicated/confusing than I thought it would be! But, I think I get the general idea that there was more than one way to keep train speed under control without the dynamic brakes and many of those ways were kind of difficult.

I also just noticed that in the subject line I used breaking, instead of braking and also didn't spell dynamic right. Blush [:I]Shy [8)] I'll promptly change that. I guess it's just one of those days.

Willy

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Gateway to Donner Summit
  • 434 posts
Posted by broncoman on Thursday, September 7, 2006 9:15 PM
 chad thomas wrote:
 Modelcar wrote:

 

I always wondered why compression couldn't have been used ade....But for most hills I imagine they simply relied on in steam cylinders {of the engine}, for baking effort....by valve action...etc...

Well what about dissipateing all that heat. If you turn the cylinders in to giant compressors that's got to produce huge amounts of heat. I suppose you could do it to for short periods of time to controll slack action but for sustained use on a long or steep grade doesn't seem feesable without a serious cooling aperatus. I don't know for sure that's just my take on it.

Couldn't they just limit the flow of the air out of a steam engine's cylinder (when the rod is plunging into the chamber).  It would be somewhat like an exhaust break on a diesel.  Not much negative effect for a pretty sizeable braking function.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, September 7, 2006 9:41 PM

....Thanks for all the comments on the braking functions and methods fellows...

I realize the air brake system on a working train is not simple and it must be handled with real knowledge of the situation, etc...If one goes about it with carelessness it will lead to disaster.

Even more wild yet...think of brakemen scrambling around across the old box car roofs setting hand brakes before Geo. Westinghouse even thought of his air brakes....!!

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,012 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, September 7, 2006 9:43 PM
 Modelcar wrote:

....Thanks for all the comments on the braking functions and methods fellows...

I realize the air brake system on a working train is not simple and it must be handled with real knowledge of the situation, etc...If one goes about it with carelessness it will lead to disaster.

Even more wild yet...think of brakemen scrambling around across the old box car roofs setting hand brakes before Geo. Westinghouse even thought of his air brakes....!!

What?  You propose to stop my trains with wind? - Commodore Vanderbilt

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, September 7, 2006 10:00 PM

....You know...think of the engineer's possition of topping a hill {and before air brakes}, and having confidence the train would not run away decending the next down grade....and the only way to prevent that was the brakemen scrambling around and across his train setting hand brakes....and hoping they set enough or hoping they actually were back there on the job....actually doing the job...That would not have been a very nice position to be in starting down every hill.  Back then some of the original grades were in the 4 % range too....!!!

Or am I missing something....Was there a way to know "the train was properly braked before starting down"....???

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Guelph, Ont.
  • 1,476 posts
Posted by BR60103 on Thursday, September 7, 2006 10:34 PM

I don't remember exactly, but I think in The Great Locomotive Chase or The General movies, they had to make emergency stops by reversing the locomotives.

I read a story in a British magazine a while back. Britian was slow with adding what they called "continuous brakes" to freight cars -- hand brakes with a long lever were good enough. The was a rule on one grade that 33% of the brakes were to be pinned down before descending -- the lever would be pulled to apply the brake and a pin put in to hold it. There was another rule that brakes were not to be applied on tank cars.  So the train comes up and is all tank cars except the mandatory pair of wagons at each end.  Guess which rule was followed.  Sign - Oops [#oops]

 

--David

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 7, 2006 11:22 PM

There was a patented system, used widely in Europe, called the Le Chatelier Water Brake, which used the compression of the cylinders for braking effort.  As I understand its operation, going down the mountain the reverse lever would be placed in full back motion and the device squirted water into the exhaust chambers of the cylinders which vaporized, providing the retarding force for the pistons. 

AFAIK the D&RGW was the only US railroad that made wide use of this device.  Evidently, it was difficult to keep from sucking exhaust gases through the exhaust nozzles into the cylinders, and it must have been tough on valve gear and rod bushings.

Robert A. Le Massena had an article in an issue of the late, lamented VINTAGE RAILS magazine about the Le Chatelier brake.

A couple of years back, TRAINS had a mountain railroading issue that covered downhill operations pretty well, including the use of dynamic brakes and retainers.

Ol' Ed

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Friday, September 8, 2006 12:04 AM
To set air brakes (as mentioned above) you reduce train line pressure and the brake valve shunts air from the reservoir to the brake cylinder.   To release the brakes you bring train line pressure back up to the original pressure which causes the brake valve to exhaust the air in the brake cylinder.   A problem arises if you have to set the brakes again before the reservoir is fully charged.   The way the retarders work is by turing a lever at the end of the exhaust pipe from the cylinder (located adjacent to the hand brake) which turns one of three ports at the end of the pipe.   The normal posittion is an opening the size of the pipe which allows instant exhausting of the cylinder pressure.  The partial is a smaller orvice that retards the escape of air from the brake cylinder and the full retarder is a much smaller orvice which allows the brake cylinder to remain charged while the train line is being pumped up to full pressure.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Friday, September 8, 2006 9:19 AM
 Modelcar wrote:

....You know...think of the engineer's possition of topping a hill {and before air brakes}, and having confidence the train would not run away decending the next down grade....and the only way to prevent that was the brakemen scrambling around and across his train setting hand brakes....and hoping they set enough or hoping they actually were back there on the job....actually doing the job...That would not have been a very nice position to be in starting down every hill.  Back then some of the original grades were in the 4 % range too....!!!

Or am I missing something....Was there a way to know "the train was properly braked before starting down"....???

Think about the brakeman. Imagine being someplace in the middle of nowhere like Grass lake summit in the middle of the night in a snowstorm walking on frozen running boards and haveing to jump from car to car while moveing. Then as you crest the summit haveing to scramble from car to car to set brakes with your only light being the faint light of a lantern. There is no way I would have that job.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, September 8, 2006 9:37 AM

....Chad:

I really don't understand why almost every train say in wintertime and at night under severe conditions...didn't run away not having enough braking power set to control train speed....I simply don't know how it was done....How the stiuation was kept under control....I simply must be missing something in my scenario assuming the brakemen back on the train would "know" when to start to tighten brakes on "how many" cars.....??? 

Was the train possibly brought to a stop to "set" the brakes before starting down any important grade...??  Must be some answer different than brakemen running around on the top of box cars {and from car to car},  winding tight brakes...How would they have had time to get a train under control as it starts downgrade if it did not stop at the summit...??

Any thoughts out there...

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Friday, September 8, 2006 9:50 AM
They sure did have a tough job. As far as knowing when to brake they used whistle commands, not sure what they were though.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Friday, September 8, 2006 10:26 AM
 Modelcar wrote:

....Chad:

I really don't understand why almost every train say in wintertime and at night under severe conditions...didn't run away not having enough braking power set to control train speed....I simply don't know how it was done....How the stiuation was kept under control....I simply must be missing something in my scenario assuming the brakemen back on the train would "know" when to start to tighten brakes on "how many" cars.....??? 

Was the train possibly brought to a stop to "set" the brakes before starting down any important grade...??  Must be some answer different than brakemen running around on the top of box cars {and from car to car},  winding tight brakes...How would they have had time to get a train under control as it starts downgrade if it did not stop at the summit...??

Any thoughts out there...

RR rules for many grades stipulated the number and setting of retainers.  The train would be brought to a full stop -- ideally when balanced on the summit (summit point at midpoint of train) and the retainers would be set.  Many hills had a siding at the summit for that purpose.  Then if during the decent in pre-airbrake days, more braking effort was needed, the enigneer would whistle for brakes to be set -- I think it was 5 short blasts and brakemen would run along the top of the cars until their assigned number of cars had the brakes set.  Being a brakeman was a job with short life expectency - thus the rapid conversion to air brakes. 2 shorts was release brakes and move forward.  3 shorts was release brakes and move in reverse.

dd

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, September 8, 2006 12:46 PM
....It is a miracle they made it over the division...and at what speed.  But then, the competition was not too swift in that era either.  Horse and buggy for some time and a bit later crude trucks with questionable roads.

Quentin

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy