Trains.com

the best at..

631 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
the best at..
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 30, 2006 7:46 AM
Just wondering

In your opinion, of the 1st class RR's in US, which have the best:

1. quality of tracks, maintenance of tracks etc.

2. maintenance of locomotives, repairs, keeping everything smooth and reliable

3. Investment in new technology (new locomotives and upgrading old ones).

4. Reliability of service, on time, 100% reliable, any time anywhere. Regardless of cost that is.


and PLEASE, explain your choice with more than 1 word per question. I want to read some interesting thoughts about this from you. And also, please mention your secon choice.

thanks


  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Sunday, July 30, 2006 8:04 AM
1. Im probably gonna go with BNSF on this one.
2. Norfolk Southern, they seem like they do some pretty good stuff with there engines.
3. Union Pacific. They pretty much buy anything that comes out.
4. Hmmm, not BNSF,not NS,not CSX,not UP,not CN,not CP,not KCS either.....

So im going for the late but still great Wisconsin Central. Even though they never were officially a class 1, they could have been. They stuck back in the regional group so they wouldnt have to pass all of the Class 1 regulations.

Alec
Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 30, 2006 8:26 AM
Isn't NS the one with all them blown turbos?  What's up with that anyway?
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: 800 Mi. from Espee Siskiyou line MP. 630.6 Orygun
  • 298 posts
Posted by WP 3020 on Sunday, July 30, 2006 9:35 AM
 wildrails wrote:
Isn't NS the one with all them blown turbos?  What's up with that anyway?

They heard somewere that railfans like the sound of nonturbo first gen. units and wanted to do some good pr but half a**ed.Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]
Railroads are "a device of Satan to lead immortal souls to hell." - an Ohio school board, 1831 - quoted in CTC Board 8/05 "If you ever wonder how you have freedom... Think, a veteran!!!" - My thought 1/08 Hey man, I don't have to try to remember the 60's... I lived too close to Eugene, Oregon.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 30, 2006 4:51 PM
I've only heard one opinion so far...

The fact that UP is among the first to buy new engines I could see so far myself, because everytime I search for pictures of new engines, UP comes up.

But is it certain that BNSF has best tracks? What about UP, how are theirs? (NS, others?)



  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, July 30, 2006 5:24 PM

I will say that I haven't recently seen any bad BNSF, UP, or NS track.  Of course, I live in an area where their lines are busy, and the trains move!

I do, however, know of a couple of major railroads whose trackage would definitely keep them out of the running.  I won't mention their names here (want to keep some of the few friends I have!), but I have talked about one of them recently on another thread.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy