Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Dakota, Minnesota, & Eastern
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Just a few more details... <br />The STB Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) blew the Rochester complaints out of the water. Mayo Clinic was the primary complainer, claiming that vibration from the increased rail traffic would cause their MRI machines to blur test results, but the STB's researchers discovered that the Mayo buildings produce more vibration than would reach them from the railroad, and that since the MRI machines were already protected against the building's vibrations, trains would not affect them. This info is in the EIS on the STB's website. <br /> <br />Second - a former C&NW co-worker who now works for the DM&E says that the results of their bid on the I&M should be announced around the first of the year. If DM&E gets the I&M, or at least part of it, they'll have access to the big gateways and not have to give their coal traffic to barges or the CP at Winona. <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy