Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The friendly Southern Pacific
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
I have mixed feelings about this. While I think that the "national security" issues has been used to justify almost anything, the UP does own the property and has the right to use it has it pleases. Safety is a major consideration at all times. <br /> <br />On the other hand, it comes across to this reader, as so many things that the RR's do has heavy-handed and unneccessarly harsh. "Four Days"? That's not much time to make arrangements to seek a new location and to move things. Maybe the RR had given them longer notice and it didn't make it into the article, but from my own experience with the RR, four days notice would not surprise me in the least. The RR's need friends, or at least understanding, in the general public, then they proceed to do thousands of things that make the public mad at them. his is just another example. They have no sense of what makes good PR, only an bad attitude.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy