Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
BNSF draws ire of Washington produce shippers - Honestly, I don't have a vendetta against BNSF.....
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by rrandb</i> <br /><br />[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by TomDiehl</i> <br /><br />[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by rrandb</i> <br /><br />The title of the article is " Quincy, Tacoma rail time growing". What you posted is taken out of the article and could be considered as old fashioned "RAIL BASHING" whether its BNSF or anyother railroad. I hardly consider the few quotes from this reporter BNSF's side of the story. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />The forum entry could be considered railbashing, the article in the link was pretty well balanced. See my analysis of it above. I simply read it with an open mind. <br />[/quote]Tom ..I am not reffering to your reply but the original post It seems to have a very anti-railroad tilt to it. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />rrandb, <br /> <br />Please explain why you feel that criticism of a railroad is "anti-railroad". If I was anti-railroad why do I want more railroads to be built here in the U.S.? If anything, I'm more pro-railroad than most railroads!
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy