Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Steam Locomotives versus Diesels
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
It is interesting to note that N&W paid ca***o dieselize its railroad, both for the power and the facilities to maintain it. It did not incur equipment trust or debt obligations to do so, as was implied. It waited until the costs per gross ton mile for the diesels was less than for its steam, and then it dieselized quickly. <br /> <br />The first equipment trusts applied to N&W diesels were applied to eleven EMD GP30s. The trust had originally covered Virginian's class EL-3 rectifier electrics. Per an agreement with the leinholder, the trust were transferred so the electrics could be sold to the New Haven. As long as the trust was in force, the electrics had to remain on N&W property. (The twelfth rectifier was converted to a slug unit.) <br /> <br />To meet its own requirements, N&W continued to pay cash for later model diesels. <br /> <br />Old Timer
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy