Trains.com

ALCO loyalty

1297 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
ALCO loyalty
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, May 22, 2006 12:26 PM
In the era of first generation diesels, it's been written often, that many railroads purchased some ALCO diesels just to make sure EMD had some competition. I've read that some of the roads continued to buy a few, even when the EMD's proved to be a better performing machine.
Why, then, did some roads embrace ALCO's to such a great extent? SP&S, D&H(?) and Lehigh Valley(I think), are three that come to mind. They seemingly liked what they bought, and bought more. What did they see in them that others didn't?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, May 22, 2006 12:35 PM
The same could be said for PRSL with Baldwins and VGN and P&WV with FM's.

A lot of it may have to do with parts standardization and expertise from a shop staff that's much more familiar with maintaining them since they weren't minority makes or oddballs on those roads.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: NYNH&H Norwich & Worcester MP21.7
  • 774 posts
Posted by David_Telesha on Monday, May 22, 2006 12:37 PM
The New Haven was a big-time loyal ALCO customer.

ALCO's were reliable, top of the line products. The NH didn't have the crankshaft problems other roads had with the 244.

Once they started it worked well for work-force and parts standardization to remain with a primary supplier.
David Telesha New Haven Railroad - www.NHRHTA.org
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: St. Louis Area, Florrisant to be specific!!!!!!!!!
  • 1,134 posts
Posted by bnsfkline on Monday, May 22, 2006 2:35 PM
The one railroad that I know of that bought strictly ALCo in the Steam and Diesel eras was the Late Green Bay and Western and sister road, KGB&W.
Jim Tiroch RIP Saveria DiBlasi - My First True Love and a Great Railfanning Companion Saveria Danielle DiBlasi Feb 5th, 1986 - Nov 4th, 2008 Check em out! My photos that is: http://bnsfkline.rrpicturearchives.net and ALS2001 Productions http://www.youtube.com/ALS2001
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 22, 2006 3:10 PM
The D&H made ALCO buys also because they were an online manufactuer, they didnt have to look far for locomotives because they were built right in Schenectady along the main D&H branch.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Monday, May 22, 2006 4:03 PM
Lehigh Valley used to put out bids for new power when required, to ease the process of getting the power they wanted at the best possible price. This was the source of the Valley's Alco fleet. Alco usually underbid EMD for comparable units. Then too, if the Valley wrote the proposal right, the Alco order, or an EMD order would be OK'd by parent PRR or PC prior to bankruptcy and the court and trustees after bankruptcy. The only Alcos LV regretted getting were the ex-Monon C628s, 633-641. They beat the[:0][censored][X-)][sigh]out of the under maintained LV trackage, especially west of Sayre, and on the curves in the road's namesake valley.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: A State of Humidity
  • 2,441 posts
Posted by wallyworld on Monday, May 22, 2006 4:17 PM
There seems to be alot of Alcos still operating given their age. I am particularly enamored toward diesels, so I am not particularly interested in learning much about them unless its a specific question-so,why are so many Alcos still operating? Seems pretty remarkable-is it durability? Operating cost?

Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Monday, May 22, 2006 4:24 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by wallyworld

There seems to be alot of Alcos still operating given their age. I am particularly enamored toward diesels, so I am not particularly interested in learning much about them unless its a specific question-so,why are so many Alcos still operating? Seems pretty remarkable-is it durability? Operating cost?
Durability is the key here, Alco built their locomotives to last, except for some C430s,C630s and C636s which had self-destructing aluminum wiring! That was a too long test in search of less expensive wiring, that hurt all the builders from 1966-75! Ask UP about their U50Cs, espically![B)]
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: A State of Humidity
  • 2,441 posts
Posted by wallyworld on Monday, May 22, 2006 4:36 PM
Another question-If they were more durable-would that not make them less expensive in the long run if properly maintained? Or was it in technological advances that Alco failed to keep up with?

Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, May 22, 2006 4:54 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by wallyworld

There seems to be alot of Alcos still operating given their age. I am particularly enamored toward diesels, so I am not particularly interested in learning much about them unless its a specific question-so,why are so many Alcos still operating? Seems pretty remarkable-is it durability? Operating cost?


Well I'm not sure what you mean..."enamored" means "to be in love with" ("en amor " in French) so I would think you would be very interested in them ?? [;)]

Are there really are that many Alco's still around?? The ones that are garner a lot of publicity so it might seem that there are a lot, but really it's a pretty small number - maybe 100 or less?? (Not talking about operating RR museums etc., just actual everyday freight haulers.) Here in Mpls St.Paul I think MN Commercial owns 5-6 Alco's (or MLW's), they are the only Alcos in this area out of maybe 1000 total. Soo Line used GP-9's until the end, in fact, I believe some are still in use on CP Rail. BNSF still has SD-9's in use. Comparable Alco's like RS-3's, RS-11's etc. are long gone.
Stix
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, May 22, 2006 7:48 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Jeffrey Bever

The D&H made ALCO buys also because they were an online manufactuer, they didnt have to look far for locomotives because they were built right in Schenectady along the main D&H branch.

Wasn't it also on the Erie Mainline, or am I thinking of someone else?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: montgomery,Alabama
  • 183 posts
Posted by Philcal on Monday, May 22, 2006 8:04 PM
ALCO built a very rugged and reliable locomotive. Even the PA-1 with the troublesome 244 prime mover, performed well in many circumstances. The PA was a superb climber, and had a very sturday and dependable electrical system(GE).The problems with the 244 prime mover, were largely corrected by the 251 power plant. However, by this time, word of the 244's problems had pretty well spread industry wide.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: between the chicago main line&the west shore line
  • 835 posts
Posted by cr6479 on Monday, May 22, 2006 8:10 PM
Did conrail order ALCO engines when she was born?
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Lakewood NY
  • 679 posts
Posted by tpatrick on Monday, May 22, 2006 8:15 PM
ALCO wasn't on the Erie main, but they did have a lot of them. I remember their F's had a very distinctive whistling sound, probably the turbocharger. Erie also ran a few PA's, some in black and yellow and some in their two-tone green passenger colors.

Today the old Erie still hosts a fleet of ALCOs on the Western New York and Pennsylvania RR. C424s are the usual power and there is a C630 sitting in the yard at Falconer, NY. They range from Hornell to Meadville and also on the newly acquired Rouses Point branch in PA .
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Monday, May 22, 2006 8:45 PM
The Minnesota Dakota and Western has a few S-2's.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, May 22, 2006 10:24 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cr6479

Did Conrail order ALCO engines when she was born?


I never thought of Conrail as having a gender!

ALCO stopped taking orders in 1968, I think and Conrail was not formed until later. Penn Central ordered some of ALCO's last production, some C636 locomotives, which were used by Conrail, of course.

M636C
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • 33 posts
Posted by Joby on Monday, May 22, 2006 11:04 PM
The most loyal ALCO customer had to have been the Spokane Portland & Seattle. They pretty much only bought ALCOs, including, i believe, 10 C636s. BC Rail and Cartier both owned MLWs not too long ago.

My favorite revenue-producing ALCOs are on the Apache Ry. In Holbrook AZ. They have some RS-18s and C420s, though don't quote me on it. The Green and White scheme kicks ***.

BTW-What is the current status of the 2 PAs? I would travel several states to seem one run (preferebly in warbonnet but NKP is OK, i guess...)
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 32.8
  • 769 posts
Posted by Kevin C. Smith on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 12:44 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by wallyworld

Another question-If they were more durable-would that not make them less expensive in the long run if properly maintained? Or was it in technological advances that Alco failed to keep up with?


If what I've read in history is correct, when GE decided to enter the mainline locomotive business, they stopped supplying ALCO with the latest designs of electrical gear, so from that standpoint ALCO would've fallen behind the technology curve.
"Look at those high cars roll-finest sight in the world."
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 1:26 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Kevin C. Smith

QUOTE: Originally posted by wallyworld

Another question-If they were more durable-would that not make them less expensive in the long run if properly maintained? Or was it in technological advances that Alco failed to keep up with?


If what I've read in history is correct, when GE decided to enter the mainline locomotive business, they stopped supplying ALCO with the latest designs of electrical gear, so from that standpoint ALCO would've fallen behind the technology curve.


As logical as that sounds, the reality was quite the opposite!

GE sold alternators to ALCO for use in the C430 and C630 while GE themselves stuck with the GT586 generator in the early U28s, the generator being the thing that kept the power to 2750HP.

The MLW M-Line locomotives, M630 and M636, sometimes had equipment more advanced than the contemporary U boats and early Dash 7s. GE was happy to sell their equipment to ALCO and MLW, and only stopped selling when MLW stopped ordering!

M636C
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 4:14 AM
EMD (GM) had the best service, field representation, and most reliable diesels, especially before supercharging became usual. Alco's GE electricals were superior, and both the diesel and the electcricals could take more abuse, overload, before quiting or frying. But Alco's field representation wasn't as widespread in quantity, and the prime movers were reputed to be tougher to maintain. In certain specific areas, like wheel slip detection, GM was suprerior, but Alco in others.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 6:50 AM
Service after the sale is also important, as daveklepper points out. Durability isn't worth that much if maintenance is overly time-consuming. Ask anybody trying to maintain a Baldwin, especially the Westinghouse electricals. The De La Vergne was built to last, but not easy to maintain or repair. Westinghouse electricals had a reputation for being able to take a lot of abuse, but when they finally did fail they were a bear to repair.

While the 251 is an excellent engine (ask Indian Railways), Alco suffered from the poor reputation of the 244.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    March 2001
  • From: SOUTHERN WASH-ATL MAIN
  • 187 posts
Posted by railroad65 on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 7:03 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Joby

The most loyal ALCO customer had to have been the Spokane Portland & Seattle. They pretty much only bought ALCOs, including, i believe, 10 C636s. BC Rail and Cartier both owned MLWs not too long ago.

My favorite revenue-producing ALCOs are on the Apache Ry. In Holbrook AZ. They have some RS-18s and C420s, though don't quote me on it. The Green and White scheme kicks ***.

BTW-What is the current status of the 2 PAs? I would travel several states to seem one run (preferebly in warbonnet but NKP is OK, i guess...)


http://www.nkp190.com/

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy