Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
NITL's suggestions to STB for rail policy oversight
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by jeaton</i> <br /><br />Mac <br /> <br />The methodology used by CURE is flawed. Trying to point that out to FM is useless, because his definition of truth is everything that agrees with his view. If you don't agree with his view then you are obviously just stupid and anything you say is wrong. <br /> <br />Jay <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />Jay, <br /> <br />If you're willing to debate without slipping into ilk territory, then can you please provide evidence that CURE's methodology is flawed? You can say what you want about my typo's and such, but if you are taking CURE to task, then you better be able to back it up. <br /> <br />CURE's numbers come from data given to the STB by the railroads. It is interesting to note that the STB will no longer allow groups like CURE, ARC, NITL, et al to access those numbers. Seems the railroads finally figured out the release of these numbers to the public has resulted in bad PR. And of course, when the railroads tell the STB to jump, the STB says "Sir, yes sir. How high?"
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy