Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
DD40X
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by TARGUBRIGHT</i> <br /><br />You would think Union Pacific had learned from the Big Boy failure, "Bigger is not better". I am surprised the SD90mac's are not seeing some of these problems. <br /> TIM A <br />[/quote] <br />Well I hate to burst your bubble Mr. Tim, but UP's Big Boy steam engines were were quite a big sucess with the UP, just as the DDA40X was also. Bigger may not be better for every RR, however, both the Big Boy and DDA40X fit UP's style of railroading very well. UP liked to run large and long heavy trains (without helpers if possible) and the DDA40X provided the horsepower and tractive effort to do that.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy