Trains.com

When was HEP introduced...

2693 views
20 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Germany
  • 357 posts
When was HEP introduced...
Posted by Supermicha on Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:54 PM
...and which was the first locomotive that was equipped with it? Maybe the F40PH?

Thanks
Michael Kreiser www.modelrailroadworks.de
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:57 PM
Im confused here. Doesnt HEP stand for Head End Power? Wouldt that just be a single loco?

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Germany
  • 357 posts
Posted by Supermicha on Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:01 PM
Yes, you are right, HEP stands for Head End Power, and i would like to know which was the first locomotive that was equipped with it and didn´t had a steam boiler for heating...
Michael Kreiser www.modelrailroadworks.de
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:09 PM
Good question. I think I read somewhere that HEP was first used on a commuter line, something about the axle generators not keeping up because of how much time they were not moveing.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:16 PM
It may have its origins around 1900. Interurbans throughout the midwest didn't have steam heat and probably used electric heaters to heat the cars. HEP for those not familiar with it uses electric heaters in the cars not steam. The power is generated by the engine
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,008 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:34 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ndbprr

It may have its origins around 1900. Interurbans throughout the midwest didn't have steam heat and probably used electric heaters to heat the cars. HEP for those not familiar with it uses electric heaters in the cars not steam. The power is generated by the engine

And to expand slightly on that - the electricity is generated either by a seperate genset or by the prime mover, which is kept revved up to maintain constant power to the train.

Before the widespread advent of locomotive generated HEP (and after steam ceased to be used for heating and cooling), older passenger cars were often modified with a generator to provide power to the rest of the train. This is still often the case for special excursions where the locomotive(s) may not have HEP capability.

It could probably be argued that early DE's, with their steam generators, were providing HEP, inasmuch as steam engines had provided the steam from what they were using for propulsion and the flash boilers used in the DEs had to replace that.

And look what I found on Trains.com - an article about HEP.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:59 PM
True , many older baggage cars had dynamo's in them .
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, December 29, 2005 2:11 PM
The earliest known instances of HEP were on FM's Speed Merchants (P12-42) which were part of lightweight train consists on NH and B&M in 1954.

In 1958, C&NW went to HEP for the re-equipped bi-level Peninsula and Flambeau 400's. This predated the HEP conversion of C&NW's suburban service.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Thursday, December 29, 2005 3:31 PM
OOOOOO!! It literally means POWER as in electircity?!!
The NW5 had a steam generator and was the first diesel to do so I beleive.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Thursday, December 29, 2005 4:02 PM
HEP first appeared (on a "steam" road) when the first Gallery cars went into service on C&NW,nearly fifty years ago! They put HEP generators in the steam generator compartments of GP7s(?),F7s, FP9s, E7s and E8s. The other Chicago commuter carriers followed suit, so by the 60's, Rock Island had FP7s, AB6s (both of 'em) E6s,E7s andE8s with HEP, The Milwaukee had, E8s and E9s. They all found that HEP AC and heat was more reliable and easier to deal with than steam, which required a boiler at both of the terminals to keep the trains from freezing up while they were laying over. C&NW also was using HEP on their inter-city Bi levels, as well. The notable exceptions: Burlington, which stuck with steam heat, since it used E5s,E7s,E8s and E9s from their inter-city (Zephyr) pool. These units got HEP'd when they were rebuilt in the mid 70's (but not the E5s-all but one having been scrapped- or the E7s). The South Shore and IC were electrified, and used M.U. equipment. The other operators, GM&O,NYC, PRR, and Wabash(N&W post 1964) all were trying to get rid of their limited Chicago commuter service. Only NYC succeeded!
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: K.C.,MO.
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by rrandb on Friday, December 30, 2005 2:00 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Supermicha

Yes, you are right, HEP stands for Head End Power, and i would like to know which was the first locomotive that was equipped with it and didn´t had a steam boiler for heating...
Not to change the subject but steam also provided Air Conditioning before HEP. [2c] ENJOY
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Brewster, NY
  • 648 posts
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Friday, December 30, 2005 7:11 AM
Steam to cars is not HEP however.
HEP stands for Hotel Electric Power on trains like the RAM TEE built in 1950's in Europe.
In USA it stoud for Headend Electric Power and yes two of NH light weight trains were first, second was C&NW on their commuter fleet.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 30, 2005 10:38 AM
I do know a little about CNW's bilevel cars - apparently the first ones (built by the St Louis Car Company) were originally fitted with dynamos under the floor, then all were converted to HEP later on (at around the same time as the cab cars were delivered). There's some more data on them at the Illinois Railway Museum website www.irm.org - they have two cars and a cab car.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, December 30, 2005 2:13 PM
Some of the confusion over HEP comes from the fact that several roads (B&M, CNJ, C&NW, maybe others) fitted s/g equipped GP7/9's in suburban service with small lighting generators in the nose to provide light for suburban coaches. This practice goes back to the steam era on some roads.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Friday, December 30, 2005 4:36 PM
Yeah, it depends what you mean by HEP. You probably mean HEP from the engine itself, not a baggage or other car just behind the engine-- so that probably rules out those UP 1930s streamliners. But HEP might mean power for lights, heat, and air-conditioning, or it might mean just power for lights.
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, December 31, 2005 8:54 PM
When mentioning early HEP don't forget the PRR KEYSTONE dating back to June 1956. The KEYSTNE was a Budd train of so called tubular cars numbered 9601-9607 and a short kitchen power car numbered 9600 that supplied the power to the other cars. Each of the coaches seated 68 plus a 14 seat smoking lounge. The cars were only 11'11" from top of rail to roof. They were able to be coupled with conventional lightweight streamlined cars of 13'6" height. When operating with conventional lightweight cars they generally operated on the rear of trhe train so the steam heated cars could be coupled to the GG-1. The KEYSTONE cars operated at the rear of the corridor trains and ran between Washington and New York. Although never repeated or no follow up orders were forthcoming the Budd built train was generally considered a success and was a forerunner of Amtrak HEP equipped cars. Amtrak bought the KEYSTONE cars but I have never found any mention of them in Amtrak service. Last heard several were in dinner train service in Michigan.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Saturday, December 31, 2005 8:56 PM
We have two former C&NW bilevels and we have to use our powerbox car with them if we want the lights on.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,190 posts
Posted by mvlandsw on Sunday, January 1, 2006 12:07 AM
I believe CNJ had some steam commuter engines which supplied electric power to the coaches from a steam powered turbo generator mounted on the rear of the tender.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, January 1, 2006 3:32 AM
Most steam commuter railroads had a light form of head-end power, providing power for lights only, with heating still by steam. The reason was the axle-driven generators and batteries of the usual downgraded coaches werenot adequate for the lighting load in stop-and-go suburban service. As a kid, I remember all the NY-area steam commuter trains had head-end lighting furnished by steam locomotives, the Putnam Division of the NYC, Erie, CNJ, with the possible exception of the NYC's West Shore.

The first Amtrak locomotives built new with headend power for all hotel services were the E-60's. The first trains were Amfleet I in the NECorridor.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Sunday, January 1, 2006 6:11 AM
Guys,

The first conventional trains with HEP generated by diesel generators in the USA are likely to have been the 1937 City of LA and City of SF trains, which had a full 85 ft car dedicated to supplying the HEP as well as three E2 units per train. Some builder's photos show the power vans coupled to the three units, since the HEP cars were equipped with EMD equipment.

During the 1940s these two trains were converted to axle generator power and steam heat to match the other trains in the UP and other fleets (SP, C&NW) that ran them. The HEP cars then were converted to baggage and or dormitory use.

Some of the earlier articulated trains, Zephyrs and Streamliners had HEP but they didn't consist of cars that could be broken up. So it's up to you if you think they count!

M636C
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Sunday, January 1, 2006 8:03 PM
As someone with more than a passing interest in PRR, I have to kick myself for forgetting the "Keystone"!
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • 51 posts
Posted by petervonb on Sunday, January 1, 2006 8:47 PM
I like the definition that says "Headend Electric Power". That seems clearest (though seldom used by anyone, including your average railroad crews).

Metro North's FL-9s used some really smoky diesel engines for the HEP that blew a rich black cloud out the side of the loco when they were fired up just before the trip started in Grand Central. Those were the days they ran diesel under Park Avenue, and even for some years after.

Their MK rebuilt FL-9s (I forget the designation) used the prime mover to generate HEP so they had to sit and roar at all the stops along the way.

Now they have all been retired from passenger duties, replaced by the Genesis locos with third rail power. At least under third rail they seem to do a better job keeping the lights and AC going across the millions of switch points in the Terminal than did the FL-9s under third rail power.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy