Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
OAT : Open Access Thread
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
greyhounds - you're splitting hairs. Bitzan himself does not differentiate between what he calls "way and structure" costs and total capital costs, because his theory says it isn't kosher to do so, and admittedly I am not totally clear as to why he frames it that way. But whether the claim is that (a) track maintenance and associated costs would go up, (b) rolling stock and associated costs would go up, or (c) both a and b, there is no evidence of that claim. For one to claim that rolling stock costs would go up, you would have to assume that rolling stock would be functioning at underutilization under OA, but in fact we already know that current rolling stock is underutilized in the current closed access system due to slow transit speeds, yard dwell, and system congestion from long slow consists. If OA resulted in a return to the Milwaukee/D&RGW model of more expedient dispatching, then car utilization would improve, and costs relative to tonnage moved would go down.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy