Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
British Railway Operations
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by Simon Reed</i> <br /><br />Good thinking, Futuremodal, but once again remember the geography of the UK. <br /> <br />Probably 95% of the population of Britain, excluding Northern Ireland, live in the area between the South Coast and the Scottish Central Lowlands. I would imagine that the longest "as the crow flies" line you could draw within that landmass would be about 650 miles. Probably over 99% of manufacturing and production goes on within that area too. <br /> <br />For internal traffic, therefore, there is no time or money incentive to develop bi-modal flows. The road network in Britain is comprehensive and, for the most part, toll-free so a trailer setting off from, say, Plymouth in the South West of the country might reach Dundee in the North East within 16 hours, which means that only two drivers would be required. <br /> <br />Factor in the time for transhipment at a railhead closest to the shipper and customers businesses and even a direct rail service would struggle to beat that timing. That's assuming that there is sufficient demand for a direct Plymouth - Dundee service. <br /> <br />Factor in the cost that the TOC would have to recover from the development and construction of a fleet of suitable cars and the provision of transhipment facilities and the trucking companies are probably 10 times cheaper. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />So it's really a question of adaquate capacity available on the road network, e.g. you're not dealing with congestion outside the industrial core? <br /> <br />In the U.S. it is estimated that bi-modal operations can be profitable in corridors as short as 350 miles, and modal transfer costs using bi-modal are so much lower than the modal transfer costs of containerization. With the fuel price differential between rail and road even more pronounced in the U.K., I would have thought that corridors as short as 200 miles would be viable for bi-modal operations.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy